HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Pentagon seeks to classif...

Tue Mar 31, 2020, 11:40 AM

Pentagon seeks to classify future year defense spending plans

By: Aaron Mehta   1 day ago

WASHINGTON — The Pentagon has asked Congress to allow it to classify its Future Year Defense Program spending projections, new documents have revealed.

The FYDP numbers, which project five years into the future, are considered essential information for the public to see where the Department of Defense expects to invest in the future, and to hold the department accountable when those spending plans change.

Information on the request was published Monday by Steven Aftergood of the Federation of American Scientists. Aftergood wrote that the proposal would “make it even harder for Congress and the public to refocus and reconstruct the defense budget.”

In its request to Congress, the Pentagon wrote that an unclassified FYDP “might inadvertently reveal sensitive information,” despite the fact the numbers have been unclassified since 1989.

https://www.defensenews.com/pentagon/2020/03/30/pentagon-seeks-to-classify-future-year-defense-spending-plans/

2 replies, 298 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 2 replies Author Time Post
Reply Pentagon seeks to classify future year defense spending plans (Original post)
turbinetree Mar 2020 OP
chicoescuela Mar 2020 #1
gratuitous Mar 2020 #2

Response to turbinetree (Original post)

Tue Mar 31, 2020, 11:46 AM

1. Probably to hide more Trump Hotel

Subsidies or direct Trump 'consulting' fees.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to turbinetree (Original post)

Tue Mar 31, 2020, 11:47 AM

2. Most transparent administration ever!

Remember that laughable promise?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread