General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsLooks like a possible #5 is a Democrat.
Last edited Thu Mar 19, 2020, 11:49 PM - Edit history (1)
Edited to say there may be a reasonable explanation for this one.@File411
Hey did I mention I DGAF if youre an R or D or I?
So @SenFeinstein
I HAVE QUESTIONS ...
I warned you that Im an equal opportunity critic
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
SMC22307
(8,090 posts)malaise
(268,717 posts)Expose all of them and lock them up
SMC22307
(8,090 posts)LonePirate
(13,408 posts)SMC22307
(8,090 posts)I'm getting whiplash trying to keep up with news.
MelissaB
(16,420 posts)Inhofe, Loeffler, Burr, Ron Johnson, Feinstein
SMC22307
(8,090 posts)Greedy, corrupt fuckers everywhere.
madaboutharry
(40,190 posts)Bernardo de La Paz
(48,965 posts)rufus dog
(8,419 posts)No name calling but I took the hit for questioning DiFi.
Hey Mods, we have people on the right side and on the wrong side. Hey Mods and DU either DiFi or I am on the wrong side! Make a choice.
alittlelark
(18,890 posts)She was my rep for 20 years.
rufus dog
(8,419 posts)Again another chance for a lock for people who can't separate the good from the bad.
catchnrelease
(1,944 posts)She admitted that if she had listened to her constituents' wishes re the Iraq War, she would have voted against the AUMF, but she said she had more inside information and voted for it. May be a coincidence, but her husband was a big stakeholder in a company that received BIG money in military contracts from the US govt. I've never forgotten that.
I don't know about this deal, I just know that I have never completely trusted her since those days. Plus at her age I think she should retire and let someone younger get in there. I know she has seniority and that's important, but it's time to go.
coti
(4,612 posts)Maraya1969
(22,464 posts)any representatives if they are crooked just because they are Democrats. That is the Republican's deal.
sop
(10,106 posts)The Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge (STOCK) Act (Pub.L. 112105, S. 2038, 126 Stat. 291, enacted April 4, 2012) is an Act of Congress designed to combat insider trading. It was signed into law by President Barack Obama on April 4, 2012.
The bill prohibits the use of non-public information for private profit, including insider trading by members of Congress and other government employees. It confirms changes to the Commodity Exchange Act, specifies reporting intervals for financial transactions.
Autumn
(44,985 posts)PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)Autumn
(44,985 posts)sop
(10,106 posts)It looks like the fine is "three times" the amount either made by the illegal transaction, or the amount saved by making the transaction.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/15/78u-1
(3) Amount of penalty for controlling person
The amount of the penalty which may be imposed on any person who, at the time of the violation, directly or indirectly controlled the person who committed such violation, shall be determined by the court in light of the facts and circumstances, but shall not exceed the greater of $1,000,000, or three times the amount of the profit gained or loss avoided as a result of such controlled persons violation. If such controlled persons violation was a violation by communication, the profit gained or loss avoided as a result of the violation shall, for purposes of this paragraph only, be deemed to be limited to the profit gained or loss avoided by the person or persons to whom the controlled person directed such communication.
hughee99
(16,113 posts)about the problems related to congressional insider trading... not to actually do anything about it. To the best of my knowledge, it has not been used to prosecute anyone in congress.
diane in sf
(3,913 posts)She is a Dino in many ways, especially economically.
alwaysinasnit
(5,060 posts)uponit7771
(90,304 posts).. that day?
thx in advance
democrattotheend
(11,605 posts)Once I saw tweets about multiple Republicans doing this, I figured it was only a matter of time before it came out that a Democrat did it too. Ugh.
DonaldsRump
(7,715 posts)Talking hardball politics.
Qutzupalotl
(14,289 posts)But its the not telling the public that I find utterly unconscionable. Maybe not technically illegal, but ought to be. Public officials have a duty to warn.
stewrat
(50 posts)worth more now then when he sold. Do a search on Barrons, they have repoorted her spouses sells for years. Looks routine to me.
MelissaB
(16,420 posts)Thank you.
stewrat
(50 posts)Lulu KC
(2,561 posts)kysrsoze
(6,019 posts)Ilsa
(61,690 posts)Have they investigated, or is this the work of some good person trying to root out evil?
democrattotheend
(11,605 posts)"The accusations that are burbling up (based on public financial disclosures) against GOP senators other than Burr and Loeffler are not nearly as compelling as the ones against Burr and Loeffler and I think people should do some reporting out before tweeting them."
Bernardo de La Paz
(48,965 posts)Apparently her husband sold at the five year low.
emmaverybo
(8,144 posts)kept it says Robert Palmer. I personally dunno about that kind of stock. He says her case totally
different from the others.
I like her. So there.
Sunsky
(1,737 posts)As I wrote before I will approach file411 or whatever the Twitter handle with skepticism. Will wait for credible reporting.
uponit7771
(90,304 posts)Mersky
(4,980 posts)Feinstein sold one position on two occasions - one sale was after it already lost a lot of value and at its lowest price at that time, but before the second sale when the price was back up. Together, the two sales dont create a clear picture.
For Moran, buying into stocks in the oil/oil services industry wasnt a good play in February. The amounts are relatively small compared to other senators stock sales.
Requires more scrutiny all the way around. I think it is important to consider whether the given senator who moved stock was downplaying the Coronavirus or overselling tRumps federal response to it.