Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MelissaB

(16,420 posts)
Thu Mar 19, 2020, 10:10 PM Mar 2020

Looks like a possible #5 is a Democrat.

Last edited Thu Mar 19, 2020, 11:49 PM - Edit history (1)

Edited to say there may be a reasonable explanation for this one.

File411
@File411
Hey did I mention I DGAF if you’re an R or D or I?
So @SenFeinstein


I HAVE QUESTIONS ...
I warned you that I’m an equal opportunity critic








41 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Looks like a possible #5 is a Democrat. (Original Post) MelissaB Mar 2020 OP
Burr, the woman from Atlanta... who are 3 and 4? (n/t) SMC22307 Mar 2020 #1
Inhofe is one of them malaise Mar 2020 #3
OK, thanks. I missed Inhofe. (n/t) SMC22307 Mar 2020 #5
Ron Johnson (other threads) and Jerry Moran (first tweet above). LonePirate Mar 2020 #4
I missed Johnson and Inhofe. Thanks. SMC22307 Mar 2020 #6
Running list: MelissaB Mar 2020 #7
Sickening. SMC22307 Mar 2020 #8
This is unacceptable. madaboutharry Mar 2020 #2
So many have jumped to a conclusion without facts or analysis. Husband sold at a multi-year low. Bernardo de La Paz Mar 2020 #36
I had a post locked for calling out DiFi in Feb rufus dog Mar 2020 #9
She is NOT on our side. alittlelark Mar 2020 #16
She is dispicable rufus dog Mar 2020 #22
I have little use for her since 2003 catchnrelease Mar 2020 #35
She's been an utterly useless waste of space for a long, long time. nt coti Mar 2020 #21
You were obviously way ahead of everyone. I never want out party to support Maraya1969 Mar 2020 #23
The Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge (STOCK) Act was enacted in 2012 (Thanks Obama) sop Mar 2020 #10
Is there a penalty for it or just a stern talking to? Autumn Mar 2020 #11
There is a "it doesn't matter if no one intends to enforce the law in this case". n/t PoliticAverse Mar 2020 #17
Figured that. They should all be forced to resign. Autumn Mar 2020 #19
Civil penalties only, as far as I can tell. sop Mar 2020 #18
The purpose of the STOCK act was to give people the impression that congress was doing something hughee99 Mar 2020 #41
DiFi and her husband made money from the attack on Iraq and from selling off post offices. diane in sf Mar 2020 #12
+1000 alwaysinasnit Mar 2020 #29
ALL of them can trade stocks nothing wrong with that its what AND when... DIFI selling what on uponit7771 Mar 2020 #13
I was afraid of this democrattotheend Mar 2020 #14
Will give DiFi time for her story, but 4Rs-1D is a good ratio DonaldsRump Mar 2020 #20
A crime is a crime. Qutzupalotl Mar 2020 #15
this was reported by Barrons 17 days ago. He sold at a near low, and the stock is stewrat Mar 2020 #24
I hope so. MelissaB Mar 2020 #25
He owns an investment firm, it's what he does. stewrat Mar 2020 #26
Not Feinstein according to this Lulu KC Mar 2020 #27
I think you're right. I was pissed until I saw the Xaction date - 1/31/20. People need to read. kysrsoze Mar 2020 #37
So, is the SEC or DoJ going to do anything about this? Ilsa Mar 2020 #28
Per Nate Silver - accusations against everyone except Burr and Loeffler may be overblown democrattotheend Mar 2020 #30
Agreed. What does that company do? Surely the advice would be hold testing & pharma companies. Bernardo de La Paz Mar 2020 #34
D.F. Sold a biotech stock when it was low. If she was betting on the pandemic, she would have emmaverybo Mar 2020 #31
Thanks for this Sunsky Mar 2020 #33
+1, her husbands in the clear uponit7771 Mar 2020 #39
Not all transactions are the same Mersky Mar 2020 #32
+1. nt greyl Mar 2020 #40
***DIFI'S HUSBAND IS IN THE CLEAR !!!*** uponit7771 Mar 2020 #38
 

rufus dog

(8,419 posts)
9. I had a post locked for calling out DiFi in Feb
Thu Mar 19, 2020, 10:23 PM
Mar 2020

No name calling but I took the hit for questioning DiFi.

Hey Mods, we have people on the right side and on the wrong side. Hey Mods and DU either DiFi or I am on the wrong side! Make a choice.

 

rufus dog

(8,419 posts)
22. She is dispicable
Thu Mar 19, 2020, 10:39 PM
Mar 2020

Again another chance for a lock for people who can't separate the good from the bad.

catchnrelease

(1,944 posts)
35. I have little use for her since 2003
Fri Mar 20, 2020, 01:37 AM
Mar 2020

She admitted that if she had listened to her constituents' wishes re the Iraq War, she would have voted against the AUMF, but she said she had more inside information and voted for it. May be a coincidence, but her husband was a big stakeholder in a company that received BIG money in military contracts from the US govt. I've never forgotten that.

I don't know about this deal, I just know that I have never completely trusted her since those days. Plus at her age I think she should retire and let someone younger get in there. I know she has seniority and that's important, but it's time to go.

Maraya1969

(22,464 posts)
23. You were obviously way ahead of everyone. I never want out party to support
Thu Mar 19, 2020, 10:39 PM
Mar 2020

any representatives if they are crooked just because they are Democrats. That is the Republican's deal.

sop

(10,106 posts)
10. The Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge (STOCK) Act was enacted in 2012 (Thanks Obama)
Thu Mar 19, 2020, 10:26 PM
Mar 2020

The Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge (STOCK) Act (Pub.L. 112–105, S. 2038, 126 Stat. 291, enacted April 4, 2012) is an Act of Congress designed to combat insider trading. It was signed into law by President Barack Obama on April 4, 2012.

The bill prohibits the use of non-public information for private profit, including insider trading by members of Congress and other government employees. It confirms changes to the Commodity Exchange Act, specifies reporting intervals for financial transactions.

sop

(10,106 posts)
18. Civil penalties only, as far as I can tell.
Thu Mar 19, 2020, 10:35 PM
Mar 2020

It looks like the fine is "three times" the amount either made by the illegal transaction, or the amount saved by making the transaction.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/15/78u-1

(3) Amount of penalty for controlling person
The amount of the penalty which may be imposed on any person who, at the time of the violation, directly or indirectly controlled the person who committed such violation, shall be determined by the court in light of the facts and circumstances, but shall not exceed the greater of $1,000,000, or three times the amount of the profit gained or loss avoided as a result of such controlled person’s violation. If such controlled person’s violation was a violation by communication, the profit gained or loss avoided as a result of the violation shall, for purposes of this paragraph only, be deemed to be limited to the profit gained or loss avoided by the person or persons to whom the controlled person directed such communication.

hughee99

(16,113 posts)
41. The purpose of the STOCK act was to give people the impression that congress was doing something
Fri Mar 20, 2020, 03:18 PM
Mar 2020

about the problems related to congressional insider trading... not to actually do anything about it. To the best of my knowledge, it has not been used to prosecute anyone in congress.

diane in sf

(3,913 posts)
12. DiFi and her husband made money from the attack on Iraq and from selling off post offices.
Thu Mar 19, 2020, 10:30 PM
Mar 2020

She is a Dino in many ways, especially economically.

uponit7771

(90,304 posts)
13. ALL of them can trade stocks nothing wrong with that its what AND when... DIFI selling what on
Thu Mar 19, 2020, 10:31 PM
Mar 2020

.. that day?

thx in advance

democrattotheend

(11,605 posts)
14. I was afraid of this
Thu Mar 19, 2020, 10:31 PM
Mar 2020

Once I saw tweets about multiple Republicans doing this, I figured it was only a matter of time before it came out that a Democrat did it too. Ugh.

Qutzupalotl

(14,289 posts)
15. A crime is a crime.
Thu Mar 19, 2020, 10:33 PM
Mar 2020

But it’s the not telling the public that I find utterly unconscionable. Maybe not technically illegal, but ought to be. Public officials have a duty to warn.

stewrat

(50 posts)
24. this was reported by Barrons 17 days ago. He sold at a near low, and the stock is
Thu Mar 19, 2020, 10:45 PM
Mar 2020

worth more now then when he sold. Do a search on Barrons, they have repoorted her spouses sells for years. Looks routine to me.

Ilsa

(61,690 posts)
28. So, is the SEC or DoJ going to do anything about this?
Thu Mar 19, 2020, 11:18 PM
Mar 2020

Have they investigated, or is this the work of some good person trying to root out evil?

democrattotheend

(11,605 posts)
30. Per Nate Silver - accusations against everyone except Burr and Loeffler may be overblown
Thu Mar 19, 2020, 11:22 PM
Mar 2020

"The accusations that are burbling up (based on public financial disclosures) against GOP senators other than Burr and Loeffler are not nearly as compelling as the ones against Burr and Loeffler and I think people should do some reporting out before tweeting them."

Bernardo de La Paz

(48,965 posts)
34. Agreed. What does that company do? Surely the advice would be hold testing & pharma companies.
Fri Mar 20, 2020, 01:25 AM
Mar 2020

Allogene Therapeutics, Inc. operates as a clinical stage immuno-oncology company pioneering the development and commercialization of genetically engineered allogeneic T cell therapies for the treatment of cancer.


Apparently her husband sold at the five year low.

emmaverybo

(8,144 posts)
31. D.F. Sold a biotech stock when it was low. If she was betting on the pandemic, she would have
Thu Mar 19, 2020, 11:42 PM
Mar 2020

kept it says Robert Palmer. I personally dunno about that kind of stock. He says her case totally
different from the others.

I like her. So there.

Sunsky

(1,737 posts)
33. Thanks for this
Fri Mar 20, 2020, 12:24 AM
Mar 2020

As I wrote before I will approach file411 or whatever the Twitter handle with skepticism. Will wait for credible reporting.

Mersky

(4,980 posts)
32. Not all transactions are the same
Thu Mar 19, 2020, 11:45 PM
Mar 2020

Feinstein sold one position on two occasions - one sale was after it already lost a lot of value and at its lowest price at that time, but before the second sale when the price was back up. Together, the two sales don’t create a clear picture.

For Moran, buying into stocks in the oil/oil services industry wasn’t a good play in February. The amounts are relatively small compared to other senators’ stock sales.

Requires more scrutiny all the way around. I think it is important to consider whether the given senator who moved stock was downplaying the Coronavirus or overselling tRump’s federal response to it.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Looks like a possible #5 ...