Sun Jan 19, 2020, 04:27 PM

Calling Hunter Biden to testify?

Put me down with the group that says it's a bullshit idea, just another distraction.

Whatever he may have done out there has NOTHING to do with T looking to find dirt on a political opponent. According to what we've read in the media, that act was illegal, regardless of whether they would have found anything or not. "Your honor, I went to rob this guy's house but didn't find anything to take, so I didn't commit a crime."

If Hunter did something illegal, or if there's probable cause, then sure, investigate it. But that's a whole separate conversation, and this impeachment has NOTHING to do with it.

I've had it up to here, and then some, with all these BULLSHIT distractions.

13 replies, 1730 views

Thread info Bookmark this thread Trash this thread

Reply to this thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

13 replies	Author	Time	Post
Calling Hunter Biden to testify? (Original post)	grumpyduck	Jan 2020	OP
That's what I can't figure how they could get away with calling him as a witness	doc03	Jan 2020	#1
Your example would appear to counter your point	MichMan	Jan 2020	#2
But not a teller from a bank across town...	Wounded Bear	Jan 2020	#6
More like they are putting the bank teller on trial saying they robbed the bank	doc03	Jan 2020	#12
What would they ask him ??	kentuck	Jan 2020	#3
I am of the opinion the Democrats should	whistler162	Jan 2020	#5
I agree.	kentuck	Jan 2020	#8
Actually, I hadn't thought of that. Good point.	grumpyduck	Jan 2020	#13
Yes. Let him testify.	GoCubsGo	Jan 2020	#9
Go right ahead and they will look ridiculous and corrupt, as they are. nt	UniteFightBack	Jan 2020	#4
Its all about making it look like he said she said bickering	jcgoldie	Jan 2020	#10
The witnesses answers need to bring it right back to why they are really there...each and	UniteFightBack	Jan 2020	#11
Hunter Biden: " ... I don't know what my name is but I know Trump abuses children..." I don't see	uponit7771	Jan 2020	#7

Response to grumpyduck (Original post)

Sun Jan 19, 2020, 06:53 PM

doc03 (33,020 posts)

1. That's what I can't figure how they could get away with calling him as a witness

Last edited Sun Jan 19, 2020, 07:36 PM - Edit history (1)

when this has nothing to do with him. That's like getting caught robbing the bank then putting the bank teller on trial.

Reply to this post

Response to doc03 (Reply #1)

Mon Jan 20, 2020, 10:31 AM

MichMan (9,074 posts)

2. Your example would appear to counter your point

A bank tellers testimony regarding a bank robbery would most certainly be relevant in the robbers trial.

Reply to this post

Response to MichMan (Reply #2)

Mon Jan 20, 2020, 11:45 AM

Wounded Bear (55,443 posts)

6. But not a teller from a bank across town...

Reply to this post

Response to MichMan (Reply #2)

Mon Jan 20, 2020, 03:26 PM

doc03 (33,020 posts)

12. More like they are putting the bank teller on trial saying they robbed the bank

because they think the teller was embezzling money.

Reply to this post

Response to grumpyduck (Original post)

Mon Jan 20, 2020, 10:34 AM

kentuck (108,851 posts)

3. What would they ask him ??

What does he know about Trump's phone call, or his withholding of military aid, or his request to go on TV and say there is an investigation against the Bidens?

What is one question they could ask Hunter Biden that would be relevant to the trial of Donald Trump?

Reply to this post

Response to kentuck (Reply #3)

Mon Jan 20, 2020, 10:59 AM

whistler162 (11,155 posts)

5. I am of the opinion the Democrats should

call the Republicans bluff.

Reply to this post

Response to whistler162 (Reply #5)

Mon Jan 20, 2020, 12:47 PM

kentuck (108,851 posts)

8. I agree.

Democrats should then object to any questioning not related to the charges in impeachment articles.

Reply to this post

Response to kentuck (Reply #8)

Tue Jan 21, 2020, 12:03 PM

grumpyduck (5,358 posts)

13. Actually, I hadn't thought of that. Good point.

Reply to this post

Response to whistler162 (Reply #5)

Mon Jan 20, 2020, 12:53 PM

GoCubsGo (31,149 posts)

9. Yes. Let him testify.

He has nothing to hide, so it will just backfire badly on them. I really don't understand why they think that making Hunter Biden testify here is going to change anything.

Reply to this post

Response to grumpyduck (Original post)

Mon Jan 20, 2020, 10:37 AM

UniteFightBack (8,231 posts)