Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

The Straight Story

(48,121 posts)
Fri Jan 6, 2012, 12:16 PM Jan 2012

BofA New Bride Can't Deposit Wedding Checks Because She Didn't Take Husband's Name

A branch of Bank of America in Albany, New York, refused to let a new bride deposit her wedding checks because she kept her maiden name, her husband Pete Iorizzo wrote in the Albany Times-Union, where he covers news and sports.

In his story, "Pete vs. Bank of America," Iorizzo explains that most of the checks he and his wife received from wedding guests were addressed to "Mr. and Mrs. Iorizzo." Because his wife chose to not to change her surname, he endorsed the checks himself and designated them "for deposit only" so she could drop by Bank of America and deposit them in the joint account they held there.

But bank tellers refused to deposit the checks due to his wife's different last name, even though she offered to present a copy of their marriage license, Iorizzo said.

What followed was a tedious series of arguments with Bank of America management over her right to deposit the checks as a member of a married couple who chose not to follow a traditional path.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/03/bank-of-america-new-bride-wedding-checks_n_1181901.html

23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
BofA New Bride Can't Deposit Wedding Checks Because She Didn't Take Husband's Name (Original Post) The Straight Story Jan 2012 OP
I've never heard of a bank not accepting endorsed checks to deposit. Incredible. yardwork Jan 2012 #1
In Ohio, I kept my name but signed things as Mrs. **** when necessary based on lawyer's advice. He SharonAnn Jan 2012 #20
That's ridiculous. ScreamingMeemie Jan 2012 #2
It happened to me.... PassingFair Jan 2012 #8
Hey you! ScreamingMeemie Jan 2012 #10
Citibank bounced an $80,000 dollar check.... Hassin Bin Sober Jan 2012 #19
Bof A. Banks of Antagonists asjr Jan 2012 #3
That is crazy justabob Jan 2012 #4
The ATM wouldn't have cared. JBoy Jan 2012 #5
This sounds like the stupidity/confusion at one branch/some staff, not BofA. onehandle Jan 2012 #6
When I was married, I didn't change my name. HappyMe Jan 2012 #7
so what is the argument? xxqqqzme Jan 2012 #9
That is definitely the question that needs to be asked LiberalFighter Jan 2012 #11
The argument is, women are not to be trusted handling money, and kestrel91316 Jan 2012 #13
Check out these other BoA screwups (from the article) KansDem Jan 2012 #12
This is a hyped non-story cthulu2016 Jan 2012 #14
A county clerk refused to register my common-law marriage in 1979. Manifestor_of_Light Jan 2012 #15
banks usually don't care who makes a deposit noiretextatique Jan 2012 #16
Hell, I deposit my fiance's checks into my BofA account sometimes..... blueamy66 Jan 2012 #17
Same thing happened to my wife WilliamPitt Jan 2012 #18
kick Liberal_in_LA Jan 2012 #21
Why "kick" the post? blueamy66 Jan 2012 #22
didn't know that. Liberal_in_LA Jan 2012 #23

SharonAnn

(13,772 posts)
20. In Ohio, I kept my name but signed things as Mrs. **** when necessary based on lawyer's advice. He
Fri Jan 6, 2012, 04:38 PM
Jan 2012

said that in Ohio, at least at that time, a person could use as many names as they wanted to, "as long as there is no attempt to defraud". That was the key point!

I rarely used my husband's last name, but occasionally it was necessary. I often put my maiden name with it, but not always.

ScreamingMeemie

(68,918 posts)
10. Hey you!
Fri Jan 6, 2012, 12:35 PM
Jan 2012

As a (former) bank employee (Huntington), if you had put deposit only they should have deposited them... but tellers sometimes don't remember these things in teller training.

Hassin Bin Sober

(26,325 posts)
19. Citibank bounced an $80,000 dollar check....
Fri Jan 6, 2012, 04:31 PM
Jan 2012

....because I didn't have my partner/boyfriend sign in front of the teller. We used the atm. It was from a title company check made out to both of us and we didn't have a joint account.

When I called, they told me they had to protect the other person. Never mind me, the 20 plus year customer.

I had to get a new check cut because they informed me they mailed the rejected FULLY ENDORCED check back to me regular mail. It never did re-appear.

I was told I had to appear at the branch and have the teller witness the signature. So I did. they never asked him for ID either.

justabob

(3,069 posts)
4. That is crazy
Fri Jan 6, 2012, 12:26 PM
Jan 2012

It would kinda sorta make sense if withdrawals were in question, but deposits? That is just nuts.

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
6. This sounds like the stupidity/confusion at one branch/some staff, not BofA.
Fri Jan 6, 2012, 12:30 PM
Jan 2012

Bank of America sucks, but the fact that another branch let them do it (as most would), doesn't say that this is corporate policy.

HappyMe

(20,277 posts)
7. When I was married, I didn't change my name.
Fri Jan 6, 2012, 12:32 PM
Jan 2012

Both of our names were on the accounts. I never had any problems with deposit or withdrawal.

xxqqqzme

(14,887 posts)
9. so what is the argument?
Fri Jan 6, 2012, 12:34 PM
Jan 2012

She pilfered the checks then under a crush of guilt decided to deposit them anyway?

'For deposit only' means nothing?

If properly endorsed and being offered for deposit in the correct account, what does it matter who is carrying the checks?

Where am I? What year is this?

LiberalFighter

(50,906 posts)
11. That is definitely the question that needs to be asked
Fri Jan 6, 2012, 12:42 PM
Jan 2012

of the teller in question and the branch manager and up the chain.

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
13. The argument is, women are not to be trusted handling money, and
Fri Jan 6, 2012, 12:48 PM
Jan 2012

can own no assets themselves. Only their fathers and brothers and husbands and sons can own and handle money.

Sheesh. Get up to speed, dude.

KansDem

(28,498 posts)
12. Check out these other BoA screwups (from the article)
Fri Jan 6, 2012, 12:47 PM
Jan 2012
In another mixup case, a man in Northampton, Massachusetts, reported receiving a notice from Bank of America demanding that he pay an outstanding mortgage of $0.00.

Though he knew he wasn't in danger of losing his home -- he had never missed a mortgage payment -- he was disappointed to find his credit score lowered and that he was unable to get in touch with the bank.

After learning about his story on the local news, Bank of America restored his credit and issued a $150 gift card.

But Bank of America has taken steps to aid its customers as well.

When the bank learned that a terminally ill woman in Sacramento, California, had not been paying her mortgage because of mounting medical bills, it decided to delay eviction proceedings until after her death.


BoA = "Bunch of Assholes"

cthulu2016

(10,960 posts)
14. This is a hyped non-story
Fri Jan 6, 2012, 12:52 PM
Jan 2012

From the article:

"...Iorizzo faced no opposition when he drove to the Bank of America one town over, who accepted the couple's checks without argument."

So we are not taliking about BoA policy here.

What the article really says is that one branch had a manager who took an overly strict view of a genral policy. A bank account has authorized names on it. This is nessecary so that you cannot deposit other people's checks. You can, in my experience, add names quite easily.

But a check made out to an entity not named on the account poses a problem.

In this case, most banks would shrug and overlook the problem. An inflexible or uninformed person might not.

There is no hint of sexism in the article. The bank branch was choking on the fact that the name on the check was not the name on the deposit slip.

If your name is Nathan and your checks say Nathan and someone writes a check to "Nat" (The name you go by) a hyper-literal dumbass might object.

The bank manager is a dumbas. End of (not very exceptional) story.

 

Manifestor_of_Light

(21,046 posts)
15. A county clerk refused to register my common-law marriage in 1979.
Fri Jan 6, 2012, 02:06 PM
Jan 2012

I didn't change my name.
I asked him "Where does it say in the Texas Family Code that I have to change my name?"

I never got an answer, of course. You don't have to change your name.

The clerk committed a misdemeanor by failing to carry out the duties of his office. He tore up three forms as I remember.



That is as bad as the people who have told me that if you live with a member of the opposite sex, for six months, you will magically wake up one day and be common-law married.

These people are not lawyers, but they know everything. Just ask them.





 

WilliamPitt

(58,179 posts)
18. Same thing happened to my wife
Fri Jan 6, 2012, 04:25 PM
Jan 2012

She kept her name, and we had to leap through a dozen flaming hoops to deposit gift checks after our wedding.

It was certainly odd to hear a bank say, "Um, no, we don't want your money."

 

blueamy66

(6,795 posts)
22. Why "kick" the post?
Sun Jan 8, 2012, 09:59 AM
Jan 2012

It was a fluke. My BofA deposits my fiance's check into my account all the time.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»BofA New Bride Can't Depo...