Tue Dec 3, 2019, 02:23 PM
mucifer (15,354 posts)
Bullet Points from the House Impeachment Report:
I cut and pasted the bullet points from the summary of the 300 page report:
I. The President Conditioned a White House Meeting and Military Aid to Ukraine on a Public Announcement of Investigations Beneficial to his Reelection Campaign The President’s Request for a Political Favor The President Removed Anti-Corruption Champion Ambassador Yovanovitch The President’s Hand-picked Agents Begin the Scheme President Trump Froze Vital Military Assistance The President Conditioned a White House Meeting on Investigations The President’s Agents Pursued a “Drug Deal” The President Pressed Zelensky to Do a Political Favor The President’s Representatives Ratcheted up Pressure on the Ukrainian President Ukrainians Inquired about the President’s Hold on Security Assistance The President’s Security Assistance Hold Became Public The President’s Scheme Unraveled The President’s Chief of Staff Confirmed Aid was Conditioned on Investigations II. The President Obstructed the Impeachment Inquiry by Instructing Witnesses and Agencies to Ignore Subpoenas for Documents and Testimony An Unprecedented Effort to Obstruct an Impeachment Inquiry Constitutional Authority for Congressional Oversight and Impeachment The President’s Categorical Refusal to Comply The President’s Refusal to Produce Any and All Subpoenaed Documents The President’s Refusal to Allow Top Aides to Testify The President’s Unsuccessful Attempts to Block Other Key Witnesses The President’s Intimidation of Witnesses The entire 300 page report: https://intelligence.house.gov/report/
|
48 replies, 7104 views
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
mucifer | Dec 3 | OP |
Kid Berwyn | Dec 3 | #1 | |
getagrip_already | Dec 3 | #3 | |
The_Counsel | Dec 3 | #8 | |
livetohike | Dec 3 | #2 | |
RKP5637 | Dec 3 | #4 | |
MuseRider | Dec 3 | #5 | |
ScratchCat | Dec 3 | #6 | |
lastlib | Dec 3 | #34 | |
WA-03 Democrat | Dec 3 | #7 | |
trueblue2007 | Dec 3 | #21 | |
UTUSN | Dec 3 | #9 | |
elleng | Dec 3 | #10 | |
aggiesal | Dec 3 | #25 | |
elleng | Dec 3 | #39 | |
C_U_L8R | Dec 3 | #11 | |
wiggs | Dec 3 | #12 | |
gibraltar72 | Dec 3 | #13 | |
mucifer | Dec 3 | #14 | |
lastlib | Dec 3 | #35 | |
EveHammond13 | Dec 3 | #15 | |
Nitram | Dec 3 | #16 | |
grumpyduck | Dec 3 | #17 | |
mucifer | Dec 3 | #18 | |
scarletwoman | Dec 3 | #19 | |
crickets | Dec 3 | #20 | |
BSdetect | Dec 3 | #22 | |
aggiesal | Dec 3 | #23 | |
lastlib | Dec 3 | #36 | |
budkin | Dec 3 | #24 | |
Hekate | Dec 3 | #26 | |
Raftergirl | Dec 3 | #27 | |
Cicada | Dec 3 | #28 | |
mucifer | Dec 3 | #29 | |
Cicada | Dec 3 | #37 | |
Botany | Dec 3 | #30 | |
SWBTATTReg | Dec 3 | #31 | |
H2O Man | Dec 3 | #32 | |
NoMoreRepugs | Dec 3 | #33 | |
robbob | Dec 3 | #38 | |
bucolic_frolic | Dec 3 | #40 | |
llmart | Dec 3 | #41 | |
bonniebgood | Dec 3 | #42 | |
Kashkakat v.2.0 | Dec 3 | #43 | |
UCmeNdc | Dec 4 | #44 | |
liberalla | Dec 4 | #45 | |
KewlKat | Dec 4 | #46 | |
mucifer | Dec 4 | #47 | |
BlancheSplanchnik | Dec 4 | #48 |
Response to mucifer (Original post)
Tue Dec 3, 2019, 02:25 PM
Kid Berwyn (1,930 posts)
1. Thank you!
Trump, he toast. Pence toast, too.
|
Response to Kid Berwyn (Reply #1)
Tue Dec 3, 2019, 02:30 PM
getagrip_already (3,237 posts)
3. that's an insult to toast....
burnt or otherwise, toast is an honorable food. It has done nothing to betray the constitution or the american people.
Toast has never broken the law routinely (or at all). Toast has never lied on a daily basis (or at all). Toast never separated children permanently from their families and locked them away without healthcare or education. I know toast (light and dark). Toast is my friend. Trump is not toast. Trump is guilty. |
Response to getagrip_already (Reply #3)
Tue Dec 3, 2019, 02:42 PM
The_Counsel (1,335 posts)
8. HA! Brilliant!
+1.
Million. ![]() ![]() |
Response to mucifer (Original post)
Tue Dec 3, 2019, 02:27 PM
livetohike (19,885 posts)
2. Thanks for taking the time to do this. Bookmarking
to read it all later
![]() |
Response to mucifer (Original post)
Tue Dec 3, 2019, 02:33 PM
MuseRider (29,320 posts)
5. Thank you!
I will not be able to read this for a couple of days probably so this is very helpful.
Lots of very bad shit, none of it belongs in our White House. |
Response to mucifer (Original post)
Tue Dec 3, 2019, 02:33 PM
ScratchCat (917 posts)
6. Ouch
That's gonna leave a mark
|
Response to ScratchCat (Reply #6)
Tue Dec 3, 2019, 05:17 PM
lastlib (13,377 posts)
34. I hope it leaves a great BIG black CHECK-Mark.....
in the box for "Removed From Office"!!
|
Response to mucifer (Original post)
Tue Dec 3, 2019, 02:35 PM
WA-03 Democrat (364 posts)
7. Thank you
Solid facts.
|
Response to WA-03 Democrat (Reply #7)
Tue Dec 3, 2019, 03:36 PM
trueblue2007 (11,811 posts)
21. Thank you.
Response to mucifer (Original post)
Tue Dec 3, 2019, 02:47 PM
elleng (93,715 posts)
10. Obstructed the Impeachment Inquiry
Response to elleng (Reply #10)
Tue Dec 3, 2019, 04:08 PM
aggiesal (4,065 posts)
25. I wish they added that Pendejo45 committed ...
a major cover-up.
This is what got Nixon in trouble with the public. The crime of breaking into the DNC headquarters didn't get him, it was the cover-up. Pendejo tried to cover-up his actions as well. And where is Pence in all this. I hope he was mentioned as well. |
Response to aggiesal (Reply #25)
Tue Dec 3, 2019, 05:39 PM
elleng (93,715 posts)
39. Coming, I suspect.
Response to mucifer (Original post)
Tue Dec 3, 2019, 02:48 PM
C_U_L8R (32,498 posts)
11. Those bullet points were shot out of a bazooka.
This is devastating.
|
Response to mucifer (Original post)
Tue Dec 3, 2019, 02:48 PM
wiggs (6,043 posts)
12. Great that the intro mentioned that he did the same with Russia. More please. nt
Response to mucifer (Original post)
Tue Dec 3, 2019, 03:01 PM
gibraltar72 (2,528 posts)
13. So they left out that he was a douchebag??
Response to gibraltar72 (Reply #13)
Tue Dec 3, 2019, 03:04 PM
mucifer (15,354 posts)
14. Oh I think in the 300 pages you can find it
Response to gibraltar72 (Reply #13)
Tue Dec 3, 2019, 05:19 PM
lastlib (13,377 posts)
35. yeah, there was only so much paper in the building to print it on......
the evidence for that would've filled a whole array of storage drives.
|
Response to mucifer (Original post)
Tue Dec 3, 2019, 03:06 PM
EveHammond13 (2,460 posts)
15. top marks to the staff and Members who produced this well written document
Response to mucifer (Original post)
Tue Dec 3, 2019, 03:07 PM
Nitram (13,875 posts)
16. Thanks for the summary.
Response to mucifer (Original post)
Tue Dec 3, 2019, 03:16 PM
grumpyduck (1,183 posts)
17. And apparently missing:
While being aided and abetted by the GOP.
|
Response to grumpyduck (Reply #17)
Tue Dec 3, 2019, 03:19 PM
mucifer (15,354 posts)
18. MSNBC said somewhere in the report they have phone call records between nunes and lev parnas
Not what was said in the phone records but they happened
|
Response to mucifer (Original post)
Tue Dec 3, 2019, 03:33 PM
scarletwoman (29,374 posts)
19. K&R - thank you! (nt)
Response to mucifer (Original post)
Tue Dec 3, 2019, 03:36 PM
crickets (5,272 posts)
20. The bullet points alone are devastating, not only by their content but
in stark contrast to what Republicans tried to pass off as their own 'report.' The Intelligence Committee has done an exemplary job.
|
Response to mucifer (Original post)
Tue Dec 3, 2019, 03:41 PM
BSdetect (6,526 posts)
22. Anyone point would have been exploited against any Dem POTUS forever....
Response to mucifer (Original post)
Tue Dec 3, 2019, 04:05 PM
aggiesal (4,065 posts)
23. Based on the (R)'s, there is nothing wrong with any of this ...
![]() |
Response to aggiesal (Reply #23)
Tue Dec 3, 2019, 05:22 PM
lastlib (13,377 posts)
36. Devin N. be like:
Maybe we need to re-name him "Drebbin Nunes"??? |
Response to mucifer (Original post)
Tue Dec 3, 2019, 04:06 PM
budkin (4,063 posts)
24. Thank you!
Very useful.
|
Response to mucifer (Original post)
Tue Dec 3, 2019, 04:27 PM
Raftergirl (201 posts)
27. Thx for the summary!
Been out all day and knew when I got home I’d have a lot of reading to do, do really appreciate the synopsis.
|
Response to mucifer (Original post)
Tue Dec 3, 2019, 04:31 PM
Cicada (3,062 posts)
28. Where is obstruction of Mueller investigation?
Even Fox News Judge Napolitano says Trump obstructed the Mueller investigation. More than 1000 former Fed prosecutors agree, most from Republican administrations. Am I on candid camera? Why are they ignoring Mueller obstruction of justice?
|
Response to Cicada (Reply #28)
Tue Dec 3, 2019, 04:32 PM
mucifer (15,354 posts)
29. "presidents refusal to allow top aids to testify" might include that
Response to mucifer (Reply #29)
Tue Dec 3, 2019, 05:32 PM
Cicada (3,062 posts)
37. Dems have one obstruction count but not the more important one
Response to mucifer (Original post)
Tue Dec 3, 2019, 04:36 PM
Botany (52,929 posts)
30. nice work
I linked to it.
|
Response to mucifer (Original post)
Tue Dec 3, 2019, 04:50 PM
SWBTATTReg (8,478 posts)
31. Thanks for posting! nt
Response to mucifer (Original post)
Tue Dec 3, 2019, 05:03 PM
H2O Man (62,691 posts)
32. Recommended.
Thank you!
|
Response to mucifer (Original post)
Tue Dec 3, 2019, 05:03 PM
NoMoreRepugs (2,899 posts)
33. Is it true the Republican summary was written w crayons??
Response to mucifer (Original post)
Tue Dec 3, 2019, 05:36 PM
robbob (2,184 posts)
38. I wish they would stop using the expression
“Set up a drug deal”. They were not trying to set up a drug deal. What they did try to do is bad enough; it doesn’t need to be embellished. It just confuses the issue. Trumpettes don’t do well with metaphors.
|
Response to mucifer (Original post)
Tue Dec 3, 2019, 05:42 PM
bucolic_frolic (14,008 posts)
40. The scandals multiply as the weeks roll by
I don't see how we will ever clean it up
|
Response to mucifer (Original post)
Tue Dec 3, 2019, 06:07 PM
llmart (8,695 posts)
41. Thanks for the terrific summary.
I've been on vacation for a week and away from news almost 100% (I highly recommend this for your sanity), so I'm now trying to catch up on all that has happened.
|
Response to mucifer (Original post)
Tue Dec 3, 2019, 08:59 PM
bonniebgood (740 posts)
42. The headlines was difficult to read. Is there another word for 'conditioned'? You know
for those that never made it out of the 6th grade.
|
Response to mucifer (Original post)
Tue Dec 3, 2019, 10:42 PM
Kashkakat v.2.0 (1,102 posts)
43. GOTTA REMEMBER THAT it was Zalensky ANNOUNCING the investigation which is what trump was
asking for. His actually following through and DOING the investigation were of less importance.
Z was supposed to make that announcement on C- span or something , I forget why it didn't happen. Pretty obvious what the intent was . |
Response to mucifer (Original post)
Wed Dec 4, 2019, 07:26 AM
liberalla (4,500 posts)
45. Many thanks!
Response to mucifer (Original post)
Wed Dec 4, 2019, 07:35 AM
KewlKat (4,061 posts)
46. So anyone read enough to find how Pence in involved? Any mention of Barr and Nunes and all the
other rotten scum that have invaded our government?
Thanks for the summary on the Con. |
Response to KewlKat (Reply #46)
Wed Dec 4, 2019, 08:16 AM
mucifer (15,354 posts)
47. pence and nunes are implicated
Response to mucifer (Original post)
Wed Dec 4, 2019, 09:55 PM
BlancheSplanchnik (18,909 posts)