HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » ***IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY HE...

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:14 AM

***IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY HEARING NOV 19 THREAD 3***

Thread #2 here - https://www.democraticunderground.com/100212703086









119 replies, 4347 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 119 replies Author Time Post
Reply ***IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY HEARING NOV 19 THREAD 3*** (Original post)
BumRushDaShow Nov 19 OP
sheshe2 Nov 19 #1
BumRushDaShow Nov 19 #2
Roland99 Nov 19 #4
Roland99 Nov 19 #3
MerryBlooms Nov 19 #6
Botany Nov 19 #5
MontanaMama Nov 19 #7
mucifer Nov 19 #9
crickets Nov 19 #11
MontanaMama Nov 19 #12
BumRushDaShow Nov 19 #10
MontanaMama Nov 19 #14
BumRushDaShow Nov 19 #22
MontanaMama Nov 19 #118
BumRushDaShow Nov 19 #119
Laura PourMeADrink Nov 19 #19
crickets Nov 19 #33
BumRushDaShow Nov 19 #8
Roland99 Nov 19 #13
crickets Nov 19 #18
Pacifist Patriot Nov 19 #20
Bayard Nov 19 #27
Roland99 Nov 19 #15
mucifer Nov 19 #17
crickets Nov 19 #16
IcyPeas Nov 19 #26
crickets Nov 19 #46
IcyPeas Nov 19 #68
Hermit-The-Prog Nov 19 #21
BumRushDaShow Nov 19 #23
BumRushDaShow Nov 19 #24
BumRushDaShow Nov 19 #25
IcyPeas Nov 19 #29
kentuck Nov 19 #28
IcyPeas Nov 19 #30
klook Nov 19 #36
BumRushDaShow Nov 19 #31
BumRushDaShow Nov 19 #32
Botany Nov 19 #34
mucifer Nov 19 #35
elleng Nov 19 #39
dweller Nov 19 #42
herding cats Nov 19 #45
Botany Nov 19 #61
herding cats Nov 19 #107
Botany Nov 19 #115
BumRushDaShow Nov 19 #37
BumRushDaShow Nov 19 #38
Politicub Nov 19 #43
BumRushDaShow Nov 19 #53
Politicub Nov 19 #40
BumRushDaShow Nov 19 #41
BumRushDaShow Nov 19 #44
uponit7771 Nov 19 #47
a kennedy Nov 19 #62
hibbing Nov 19 #48
Roland99 Nov 19 #52
Mersky Nov 19 #49
BumRushDaShow Nov 19 #50
Pacifist Patriot Nov 19 #55
TwilightZone Nov 19 #72
elleng Nov 19 #87
Pacifist Patriot Nov 19 #51
The Velveteen Ocelot Nov 19 #56
crickets Nov 19 #60
dchill Nov 19 #54
Mersky Nov 19 #57
uponit7771 Nov 19 #58
BumRushDaShow Nov 19 #59
ancianita Nov 19 #71
crickets Nov 19 #77
Bayard Nov 19 #63
BumRushDaShow Nov 19 #64
catbyte Nov 19 #65
IcyPeas Nov 19 #66
crickets Nov 19 #73
BumRushDaShow Nov 19 #67
BumRushDaShow Nov 19 #69
Midnightwalk Nov 19 #70
ancianita Nov 19 #74
BumRushDaShow Nov 19 #75
Miles Archer Nov 19 #82
demmiblue Nov 19 #76
Roland99 Nov 19 #78
hibbing Nov 19 #83
crickets Nov 19 #103
ancianita Nov 19 #79
mucifer Nov 19 #85
Mersky Nov 19 #86
spanone Nov 19 #80
BumRushDaShow Nov 19 #81
ancianita Nov 19 #88
BumRushDaShow Nov 19 #93
elleng Nov 19 #95
mnhtnbb Nov 19 #90
spooky3 Nov 19 #92
Gidney N Cloyd Nov 19 #96
BumRushDaShow Nov 19 #104
spooky3 Nov 19 #116
The Velveteen Ocelot Nov 19 #84
catbyte Nov 19 #89
madaboutharry Nov 19 #91
Roland99 Nov 19 #100
Roland99 Nov 19 #101
crickets Nov 19 #111
mnhtnbb Nov 19 #94
gristy Nov 19 #97
Botany Nov 19 #98
ancianita Nov 19 #106
BumRushDaShow Nov 19 #109
BumRushDaShow Nov 19 #99
dchill Nov 19 #102
Miles Archer Nov 19 #105
IcyPeas Nov 19 #114
Midnightwalk Nov 19 #108
ancianita Nov 19 #113
Midnightwalk Nov 19 #117
Mersky Nov 19 #110
BumRushDaShow Nov 19 #112

Response to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:15 AM

1. Kick

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:16 AM

2. Castor asking Vindman regarding the "regular" and "irregular" policy channels

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BumRushDaShow (Reply #2)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:17 AM

4. surprised he wants to delve into this. not doing his side any favors here.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:16 AM

3. To continue from thread 2...ranking (and he puts the "rank" in ranking) counsel still plodding...

tirelessly through meaningless bs

nothing of any evidentiary value for the last 20 min at least.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Roland99 (Reply #3)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:19 AM

6. He's

blatantly misstating witness testimony of Taylor and Kent.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:19 AM

5. Castor is just selling conspiracy theories.

n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:19 AM

7. The GOP is trying their best

to impugn the reputation of Lt Col Vindman by hammering on the offers to join the Ukrainian government. Disgusting.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MontanaMama (Reply #7)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:20 AM

9. Didn't work

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to mucifer (Reply #9)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:21 AM

11. No, it did not, and it made Castor sound very petty. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to mucifer (Reply #9)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:23 AM

12. I don't think it did.

but the point, I believe, was to just put it out there for public consumption… Meaning Fox “news”. You can count on that being headlines on their cockamamie channel today.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MontanaMama (Reply #7)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:21 AM

10. Yup.

And it sounded idiotic.

That may play to the Faux Snooze conspiracy-theory crowd but not to the American public.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BumRushDaShow (Reply #10)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:25 AM

14. It did sound ridiculous.

I’m curious, however, about the offer itself. What in the world could Ukrainian leader ship be trying to accomplish by luring Lt Colonel Lindemann away from the US? It sounds extremely shady.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MontanaMama (Reply #14)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:34 AM

22. Well

He has military experience, speaks the languages fluently, and was born in Ukraine (when it was part of the U.S.S.R.) although he and his brother were toddlers when their family left to come to the U.S., so he really has no association outside of his family and any postings there.

But as a note - whether it is a foreign country or a domestic company - government employees often get solicitations to come work for other entities (anyone who does "field work" gets these offers pretty frequently). The federal government has a process to report such offers and he did so!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BumRushDaShow (Reply #22)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 12:53 PM

118. Agree with everything you

pointed out. The tin foil hat voice in my head wonders if he weren’t being set up. Some of the The folks around Col Vindman have turned out to be sketchy.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MontanaMama (Reply #118)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 12:55 PM

119. If Ghouliani was involved I wouldn't put it past them doing such

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MontanaMama (Reply #7)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:30 AM

19. Not sure why...he doesn't seem particularly biased

at all.(against trump)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MontanaMama (Reply #7)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:40 AM

33. MSNBC is strongly calling out the effort to smear Vindman.

Pointing out how horrific it is to smear active duty military, decorated active duty military. Expressing shock that Repubs cannot find the bottom of the barrel when going to this line of questioning, that his family has been offered safe haven on a military base because Lt Col Vindman is perhaps in danger from having testified, and how shameful that is.

Calling him the best of the best, and going on and on about his integrity - as we all should.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:20 AM

8. **** 5 - 10 MINUTE BREAK ****

(thank goodness cause needed a bathroom break myself! )

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BumRushDaShow (Reply #8)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:25 AM

13. That sign on the wall...the 99 days

the #TraitorGOP isn't even trying to hide the fact they don't have any defense. All they want is to:

name the whistleblower (akin to publicly naming a person who pulled a fire alarm when seeing a burning building)
continue to push many-times-over debunked conspiracy theories (debunked by EVERY witness)
ramble on meaninglessly over unrelated matters (to bore viewers to get them to tune out?)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Roland99 (Reply #13)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:29 AM

18. I'd be a little more impressed if they'd hired graphics people who understood kerning.

The message is silly enough, but to use what looks like a student effort to blast it out there is just lame.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Roland99 (Reply #13)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:31 AM

20. It's even more remote than that.

It's more like publicly naming someone who called the police to report they had been told a drug cartel was operating out of a house across the street, here are the names of some people who have been in and out of the house you might want to talk to, and from their experience living in the neighborhood for many years, the behavior over there does look awfully suspicious. Thereby triggering an investigation.

In other words, there is no reason whatsoever to reveal the identity of the whistleblower even if it wasn't against the law to do so. But the identity becoming known could put that person at risk of retaliation.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Roland99 (Reply #13)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:36 AM

27. I still don't understand why those signs are allowed

You certainly wouldn't see them in a regular court room. Blatant and despicable display for the cult.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:26 AM

15. C-SPAN feed has people interviewing some repuke

this repuke is essentially saying the commander-in-chief is the final authority and that Lt Col Vindman should not be testifying against the president's actions and words.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Roland99 (Reply #15)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:28 AM

17. blind cult worship

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:27 AM

16. Oh, good grief. The student council has put up new propaganda posters. Losers. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to crickets (Reply #16)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:36 AM

26. what do they say?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to IcyPeas (Reply #26)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:45 AM

46. One says '99 days since Adam Schiff learned the ID of the whistleblower.'

which is untrue. Another quotes Rep Van Drew D-NJ about millions of dollars spent, time spent, how he thinks it's fracturing the nation and not a good thing. I haven't see the third one clearly, sorry. They are straight up propaganda.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to crickets (Reply #46)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:51 AM

68. thanks

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:33 AM

21. ABC talker, "no one's really taking that seriously"

In the discussion in the break, one of the ABC talkers mentioned Trump saying he might testify but, "no one's really taking that seriously".

This is where we are: No one takes the word of the president seriously. Except our military, of course; they took an oath to do so.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:34 AM

23. ***ABOUT TO START UP AGAIN***

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:35 AM

24. 5 minute member questions - Schiff starts off

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:36 AM

25. Schiff is trying to clean up MOO MOO's BULLSHIT via his own questioning

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BumRushDaShow (Reply #25)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:37 AM

29. that's why Schiff is so good at this.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:37 AM

28. "Col. Vindman, why did Hunter Biden withhold $400 million from Ukraine?"

And why did Hunter Biden forbid the new Ukrainian president from a visit tothe White House?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kentuck (Reply #28)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:38 AM

30. LOL

and was Hunter Biden at the grassy knowl?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kentuck (Reply #28)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:42 AM

36. LOL, about right.

“Could Hunter Biden be the whistleblower? And what is his connection to Hillary’s child-sex pizza parlor?”

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:38 AM

31. Schiff includes mention of press report about Ghouliani's "wanting to meddle in an investigation"

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:39 AM

32. Schiff connecting Ghouliani's intent and Drumpf's intent being in sync

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:40 AM

34. Is Gym Jacket Off Jordan there?

n/t

BTW Schiff is much better @ that "Fancy Lawyer Talking Stuff" aka his follow up
Q.A. with the witnesses .

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Botany (Reply #34)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:42 AM

35. yeah he will have his turn eventually

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Botany (Reply #34)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:43 AM

39. Yes, coming up (after noones.)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Botany (Reply #34)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:43 AM

42. don't see him

nor are there any stupid signs behind the repugs
oh crap, there he is 😑
and crap again... there's the signs

✌🏼

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Botany (Reply #34)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:44 AM

45. He's up now.

He seems less caffeinated so far, but still a twit.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to herding cats (Reply #45)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:47 AM

61. I have no idea what he was talking about .... gibberish

about the call after the call and about that call

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Botany (Reply #61)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 12:02 PM

107. Ha! Neither did I...

That's a perfect video for we just witnessed.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to herding cats (Reply #107)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 12:10 PM

115. Gym Jacket-Off spoke 3 minutes of gibberish before asking one simple question.

How many people listened in on that phone call?

but before that call and about that call and what to was that call related during that call

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:42 AM

37. Schiff invoking Bolton's "drug deal" term & political investigations and how itcame up in the call

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:42 AM

38. MOO MOO ALERT - MUTE & he'll be handing off to GYMSUIT

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BumRushDaShow (Reply #38)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:44 AM

43. Gym looks especially disheveled today

And he’s being a dick.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Politicub (Reply #43)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:46 AM

53. He's always in a perpetual state of dickery

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:43 AM

40. Ugh - the five minute rounds

Someone please poke my brain out with a stick.

Has anything been revealed during these rounds that is as substantive as the 45 minute questioning?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:43 AM

41. Here comes the spun-up wacko Gymsuit - MUTE ALERT

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:44 AM

44. Gymsuit going after Vindman

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:45 AM

47. Jordan is a scumbag ... he's horrible

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to uponit7771 (Reply #47)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:48 AM

62. I know........I despise him.....

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:45 AM

48. I want to thank you for your service, now let me disparage your reputation n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to hibbing (Reply #48)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:45 AM

52. Is he trying to pin Vindman as the whistleblower?

or just general reputation smearing?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:45 AM

49. Oh look, Gym wore clam diggers and a tank top

Must have something important to do later.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:45 AM

50. Vindman reading his last performance appraisal to torpedo Gymsuit

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BumRushDaShow (Reply #50)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:46 AM

55. What the hell are they trying to accomplish impugning an army office with excellent fit reps?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Pacifist Patriot (Reply #55)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:53 AM

72. It's all they have.

They have no plan or defense, so their only hope is to discredit the witnesses. Good luck with that.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TwilightZone (Reply #72)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:57 AM

87. right

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:45 AM

51. Anyone else think the GOP bizarro questions are designed to be out of context sound bites on Faux?

They do not make much sense in the broader scheme of things.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Pacifist Patriot (Reply #51)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:47 AM

56. Exactly that. And to keep Fat Nixon happy.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Pacifist Patriot (Reply #51)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:47 AM

60. +1

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:46 AM

54. Jacketoff, Jacketoff, buddy gonna shut you down!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:47 AM

57. "Preposterous" Vindman says to leaking information

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:47 AM

58. Jordan is talking too fast on purpose.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:47 AM

59. Schiff cutting off the wacko from doing the whistlebloower outing

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BumRushDaShow (Reply #59)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:52 AM

71. Masterful!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BumRushDaShow (Reply #59)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:54 AM

77. Vindman's counsel is really on the ball about this.

I love how Jordan breaks the rules, but doesn't want the reprimand to come out of his time.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:49 AM

63. Jordan saying Vindman has been said to have "poor judgment", by various people

And has leaked information. The good Colonel then read a glowing recommendation.

Schiff, again saying--You are not going to try to out the Whistle Blower.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:49 AM

64. Vindman is like WTF?

This guy is nuts...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:50 AM

65. Gym is such a dick.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:50 AM

66. gym is just trying desparately to

have a "gotcha moment". he always does that. b-o-r-i-n-g

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to IcyPeas (Reply #66)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:53 AM

73. In the process, he's making Morrison sound bad. Bit o' unintentional blowback there.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:50 AM

67. Jim Himes (D-CT) up

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:51 AM

69. Himes reading Drumpf's insulting tweet against Williams



Calling it "witness tampering".

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:51 AM

70. Jordan going after whistleblower Again

Traitorous rat. Schiff shut him down i think on jordans time. Vindman looks like he wants to smack jordan.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Midnightwalk (Reply #70)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:53 AM

74. Schiff thinks circles around this ratfucker.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:54 AM

75. Himes to Vindman - "Do you call yourself a 'Never Trumper'"

Vindman - "I call myself a 'never partisan'".

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BumRushDaShow (Reply #75)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:56 AM

82. Yeah...I just started watching, but that might be the line of the day. n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:54 AM

76. Himes is really impressive. n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to demmiblue (Reply #76)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:55 AM

78. Jim "Freakin A" Himes!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to demmiblue (Reply #76)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:56 AM

83. Himes was excellent

He laid it out exactly what the point of the other side's questioning was about. Shove that stuff right in their faces.


Peace

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to hibbing (Reply #83)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 12:01 PM

103. Yup. Love how he brought up the tweets aimed at Williams (witness intimidation)

as well as explanations of military decorations on Vindman's uniform, his injury in line of duty. Skewered the Repubs questioning loyalties. Bravo to him.

"It's the kind of thing you say when you're defending the indefensible."

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:55 AM

79. Himes just nailed the heart of vampire politics!! Himes' statement has to go viral.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ancianita (Reply #79)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:56 AM

85. It will never be on fox news that's for sure

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ancianita (Reply #79)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:56 AM

86. I know I'll watch that again

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:55 AM

80. here comes ratfucker. going after semantics

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:56 AM

81. John Ratfucker (R-TX) up with the usual bullshit

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BumRushDaShow (Reply #81)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:57 AM

88. "Bribery" is up to the Articles of Impeachment to define, ratfucker from TX!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ancianita (Reply #88)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:58 AM

93. He can't dismiss what went on

They have no other argument.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ancianita (Reply #88)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:59 AM

95. thanks. tell ratfker.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BumRushDaShow (Reply #81)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:58 AM

90. He is such a dumbfu*k

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BumRushDaShow (Reply #81)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:58 AM

92. Hey, dumbass Ratf.; fact witnesses aren't supposed to draw legal

Conclusions as to what “bribery” is.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to spooky3 (Reply #92)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:59 AM

96. +1

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to spooky3 (Reply #92)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 12:02 PM

104. Correct.

Anyone who also does investigations isn't supposed to provide "conclusionary" descriptions of events. That's what the lawyers are for.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to spooky3 (Reply #92)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 12:11 PM

116. And Schiff clarifies the point! Nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:56 AM

84. Himes does a scathing rebuttal of the canard that Vindman is disloyal because

he was offered and turned down a position in Ukraine.

Now that dumbass Ratcliffe is up.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:57 AM

89. They're so pathetic.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:58 AM

91. Radcliff wasting time with bullshit.

Fact witnesses testify to facts.

They do not testify to legal terms or legal theories.

The republicans have nothing.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to madaboutharry (Reply #91)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 12:00 PM

100. Let him keep saying "bribery". Quid Pro Quo is not an actual crime (like collusion)

it's the underlying crime that falls under that quid pro quo umbrella

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Roland99 (Reply #100)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 12:00 PM

101. The "Quid" is a Crime: No Need to Prove "Pro Quo" in Ukrainegate

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to madaboutharry (Reply #91)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 12:03 PM

111. Nothing but soundbites and theatrics. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:59 AM

94. The answer is legal definition of the action.

Dumbshit.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:59 AM

97. ratcliffe - OMG what a POS

What the hell do the fact witnesses have to do with stating that Trump has committed bribery.
Of course, nothing at all.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:59 AM

98. So the Texas guy has put a stack of papers on the table? Wow.

BTW don't worry Mr. Texas the House Dems will put together a nice tight bribery case.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Botany (Reply #98)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 12:02 PM

106. +1 Indeed, they will. Pelosi saw it first, and with evidence, Americans will agree in the polls.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Botany (Reply #98)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 12:03 PM

109. Probably all blank put into packs with big binder clips

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 11:59 AM

99. Terri Sewell (D-AL) up

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 12:01 PM

102. Ratliffe is flamboyantly disgusting. He's an emetic.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to dchill (Reply #102)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 12:02 PM

105. He's a whiny little snowflake. All I'm hearing from the R's today is whining. n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to dchill (Reply #102)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 12:09 PM

114. ewww good word

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 12:02 PM

108. Ratcliffe is a sneaky idiot

Lawyers identify the legal terms. These witnesses are too smart to loosely use legal terms.

That’s the job for non-lawyers like me on DU.

In any case these hearings are to expose the facts. The judicial committee will lay out the charges.

I wonder if Nadler will limit those hearings to deciding the articles of impeachment and prevent attempts to drag in new evidence.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Midnightwalk (Reply #108)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 12:06 PM

113. Nadler's committee will lay out articles that Schiff's committee recommends. I don't think

they'll argue about the evidence the Intel Dems have put together through eyewitness testimony.

It's been too compelling.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ancianita (Reply #113)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 12:13 PM

117. Yeah that's what i realized

The republicans will try to continue bringing up the whistleblower and the bidens but the democratic members (nadler) will tell them no new evidence allowed.

As they should. Bringing up unrelated items like what the bidens did have no bearing on what trump did.

Schiff is explaining right now that fact witnesses don’t give opinions on what bribery means

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 12:03 PM

110. Maybe if your poorest constituents had broadband internet

They could pull apart your bribery/word usage shell game.

Aren’t you getting tired of your tortured logic, ratcliffe?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 12:04 PM

112. ***IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY HEARING NOV 19 THREAD 4*** is up

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread