Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHere's the Text of the Impeachment vote thingy
https://docs.house.gov/billsthisweek/20191028/BILLS-116-HRes660.pdfh/t
Link to tweet
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 586 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (7)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Here's the Text of the Impeachment vote thingy (Original Post)
blogslut
Oct 2019
OP
Roland99
(53,342 posts)1. How long until minority members issue a myriad of useless subpoenas
in order to delay the process?
MineralMan
(146,286 posts)3. Minority subpoenas require the concurrence of the chair.
If there is no concurrence by the chair, the ranking member may ask for a vote of the committee. Since the committee reflects the makeup of the House, such votes will probably not favor the minority side.
But, the ranking member can ask, if the chair doesn't concur. If the ranking member can get a majority of the committee to go along, then he can have his subpoena. If not, he can't. Elections matter.
StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)4. The resolution is crafted to avoid that
The ranking minority member of the Permanent Select Committee is authorized, with the concurrence of the chair, to require, as deemed necessary to the investigation
(i) by subpoena or otherwise
(I) the attendance and testimony
of any person (including at a taking
of a deposition); and the production of books, records, correspondence, memoranda, papers, and documents; and
(ii) by interrogatory, the furnishing of information.
(B) In the case that the chair declines to concur in a proposed action of the ranking minority member pursuant to subparagraph (A), the ranking minority member shall have the right to refer to the committee for decision
(i) by subpoena or otherwise
(I) the attendance and testimony
of any person (including at a taking
of a deposition); and the production of books, records, correspondence, memoranda, papers, and documents; and
(ii) by interrogatory, the furnishing of information.
(B) In the case that the chair declines to concur in a proposed action of the ranking minority member pursuant to subparagraph (A), the ranking minority member shall have the right to refer to the committee for decision
In other words, the Ranking Member can subpoena someone ONLY if the Chair agrees or if a majority of the committee agrees.
Midnightwalk
(3,131 posts)2. Additional time for questions?
Did l read that right? The chair can add as many 90 minute sessions as needed before the standard 5 minute back and forth. The time in the sessions is still split which is fair.
The other great thing is there will be a public redacted transcript of the private sessions.