Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
MSNBC reporting Sarah Palin ran a faster marathon time than Paul Ryan (Original Post) catbyte Sep 2012 OP
LOL BumRushDaShow Sep 2012 #1
From Politico: Cali_Democrat Sep 2012 #2
Bwaaaaaaaaaaaah hahahahahha malaise Sep 2012 #5
Not only that, Ryan's time was made at 20 years old; ecstatic Sep 2012 #9
Love it! CrispyQ Sep 2012 #3
Yeah, too flunkies in a pod. HopeHoops Sep 2012 #4
To be fair, Palin started from the red tee while Ryan's ego dictated he punt from the blue tee Brother Buzz Sep 2012 #6
Is that Paul W. Ryan? Coyotl Sep 2012 #7
Ha Ha gopiscrap Sep 2012 #8
Wimpy liar lied jsr Sep 2012 #10
She ran it with her mouth in under 30 minutes..... lastlib Sep 2012 #11
From Jezebel: Canuckistanian Sep 2012 #12
She did. Chorophyll Sep 2012 #13
...and chris christie set a new pole vaulting record!!!!! spanone Sep 2012 #14
Sh had an advantage on him. Ruby the Liberal Sep 2012 #15
 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
2. From Politico:
Mon Sep 3, 2012, 12:05 PM
Sep 2012
http://www.politico.com/blogs/click/2012/09/palins-marathon-time-beats-paul-ryans-134141.html

The Republican vice presidential candidate recently misstated his marathon time (claiming that he ran the 26.2 mile race in “two hour[s] and fifty-something”), and Runner’s World called his bluff on Friday.

He actually crossed the line at “4 hours, 1 minute, and 25 seconds,” according to the magazine.

That’s just slightly slower than Palin ran in 2005, finishing a marathon in 3:59.

Ryan did, however, beat Oprah Winfrey’s time (a common benchmark for first time marathoners) of 4:29.



ecstatic

(32,640 posts)
9. Not only that, Ryan's time was made at 20 years old;
Mon Sep 3, 2012, 01:51 PM
Sep 2012

Palin's time was at 41 years old. Palin's a dingbat but she's in pretty good shape!

Canuckistanian

(42,290 posts)
12. From Jezebel:
Tue Sep 4, 2012, 05:28 PM
Sep 2012
Paul Ryan lying about how fast he ran a marathon is kind of pathetic in the way the kid who lies and says his dad's an astronaut who lives on the moon when his dad's really an insurance salesman who lives in Ohio is pathetic. It's sad. It's unbecoming. And I guess it doesn't have much to do with politics — until you compare his time to recent GOP Vice Presidential nominee Sarah Palin's. Who's the more fleet-footed ideologue?

It's Palin! According to Politico, Ryan's time of 4:01:59 (totally respectable for a first marathon, btw) was bested by the slightly faster Alaskan, who completed her first 26.2 in 3:59. But before you claim that the two ran virtually identical races, consider that Palin ran hers in 2005, when she was 41 years old. In contrast, Ryan was a 20-year-old He-Man when he ran his race twenty-odd years ago. Looks like Sarah wins the day.


http://jezebel.com/5940322/sarah-palin-ran-a-faster-marathon-than-libertarian-macho-man-paul-ryan

Chorophyll

(5,179 posts)
13. She did.
Tue Sep 4, 2012, 05:31 PM
Sep 2012

She runs fast for a grown woman and is an idiot; he ran not particularly fast for a 20-year-old man and is a pathological liar.

Not seeing the hilarity, I guess.

Ruby the Liberal

(26,219 posts)
15. Sh had an advantage on him.
Tue Sep 4, 2012, 05:37 PM
Sep 2012

21 years older than him when she ran, and that after having given birth to 4 kids.

You can't expect a 20 year old guy to compete with that, can you?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»MSNBC reporting Sarah Pal...