HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Hill's lawyers: executive...

Tue Oct 15, 2019, 04:17 AM

Hill's lawyers: executive privilege disappears when there's reason to believe there was

government misconduct

BOOM!!!!




"We also understand that executive privilege likely does not apply to information which is no longer confidential and has come within the sphere of public knowledge through broad disclosures."




Heh.

And all the sweeter that it comes from a former lackey of Trump

4 replies, 2572 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 4 replies Author Time Post
Reply Hill's lawyers: executive privilege disappears when there's reason to believe there was (Original post)
Soph0571 Oct 2019 OP
Sherman A1 Oct 2019 #1
hlthe2b Oct 2019 #2
Sherman A1 Oct 2019 #4
QED Oct 2019 #3

Response to Soph0571 (Original post)

Tue Oct 15, 2019, 04:23 AM

1. While I agree with the points made in the argument and

I would like to see the whole cabal in orange jump suits.

I would point out that according to the quote posted in the OP by the attorneys

"We also understand that executive privilege likely does not apply to information which is no longer confidential and has come within the sphere of public knowledge through broad disclosures."

The word "likely" does not make it so.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Sherman A1 (Reply #1)

Tue Oct 15, 2019, 06:40 AM

2. "Likely" only correctly describes that which has not been specifically addressed by SCOTUS

or at least Federal appeals courts. I think you read too much into that particular word being used. Based on previous decisions that is the correct descriptor IMO.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to hlthe2b (Reply #2)

Tue Oct 15, 2019, 06:56 AM

4. Time will tell

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Soph0571 (Original post)

Tue Oct 15, 2019, 06:54 AM

3. "malversation"

"reason to believe that there has been malversation in office..."

malversation[ mal-ver-sey-shuh n ]

noun Chiefly Law.
improper or corrupt behavior in office, especially in public office.

Not exactly the definition I expected from looking at the roots - mal = bad. I thought the "vers" meant speaking or communication but it's from versari = to conduct oneself.

Conversation, where I thought the latter part was from, is actually from conversari meaning "to associate with."

Sorry, got sidetracked by the etymology...it looks like the stonewalling is starting to crumble. I hope others start acting in their own interests instead of IQ45.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread