HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Could the House not just ...

Tue Sep 17, 2019, 03:56 PM

Could the House not just vote to hold in Inherent Contempt

and put in jail all those — like Lewandowski — who are claiming “absolute privilege”?

And/or assess a fine of $10k — which doubles EVERY DAY thereafter? (Do the math. This would reach staggering numbers, quickly.)

Might this finally get past the obstruction that’s going on?

IANAL. Could *conspirators* to commit obstruction be assessed the same monetary fine? (Am I correct in assuming that this would NOT be the same as an indictment coming from the DoJ?) Since rubles are all that matter to at least one person in this conspiracy, might such a monetary fine finally break through the myriad impasses to House oversight he’s finagled?


Asking for a friend.

3 replies, 681 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 3 replies Author Time Post
Reply Could the House not just vote to hold in Inherent Contempt (Original post)
majdrfrtim Sep 2019 OP
global1 Sep 2019 #1
onenote Sep 2019 #2
GulfCoast66 Sep 2019 #3

Response to majdrfrtim (Original post)

Tue Sep 17, 2019, 04:03 PM

1. If The Dems Could Do That - I Don't Think That The Dems Have The Courage To Do That.....nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to majdrfrtim (Original post)

Tue Sep 17, 2019, 04:10 PM

2. He would be out of jail in five minutes based on a habeas corpus petition

He isn't required to answer questions in any particular way. He only was required to show up

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to majdrfrtim (Original post)

Tue Sep 17, 2019, 04:36 PM

3. No. They can't.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread