General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDonald Trump Has Never Explained a Mysterious $50 Million Loan. Is It Evidence of Tax Fraud?
A Mother Jones investigation has uncovered new information about a puzzling Trump deal.
Russ Choma 7 hours ago
Donald Trumps massive debtshe owes hundreds of millions of dollarsare the subject of continuous congressional and journalistic scrutiny. But for years, one Trump loan has been particularly mystifying: a debt of more than $50 million that Trump claims he owes to one of his own companies. According to tax and financial experts, the loan, which Trump has never fully explained, might be part of a controversial tax avoidance scheme known as debt parking. Yet a Mother Jones investigation has uncovered information that raises questions about the very existence of this loan, presenting the possibility that this debt was concocted as a ploy to evade income taxesa move that could constitute tax fraud.
Heres what is publicly known about this mystery debt: On the personal financial disclosure forms that Trump must file each year as president, he has divulged that he owes over $50 million to a company called Chicago Unit Acquisition LLC. The forms note that this entity is fully owned by Trump. In other words, Trump owes a large chunk of money to a company he controls.
The disclosures state that this loan is connected to Trumps hotel and tower in Chicago, and the forms reveal puzzling details about Chicago Unit Acquisition: It earns no revenuesuggesting that Trump was not paying interest or principal on the loanand Trump assigns virtually no value to Chicago Unit Acquisition. Something doesnt add up. Under basic accounting principles, a firm that is owed money and has no outstanding debt should be worth at least as much as it is owed. The loan has another odd feature: It is identified as a springing loan, a type of loan made to borrowers who are viewed as credit risks. Known sometimes as bad boy loans, these agreements allow the lender to impose harsh repayment terms if certain criteria arent met. These are not the type of loan terms that someone is likely to impose on himself.
The Trump Organization has consistently refused to answer questions about Chicago Unit Acquisition, a limited liability company it formed in Delaware in 2005, as construction began on the Trump International Hotel and Tower in downtown Chicago. But Trump did tell the New York Times in a 2016 interview that this debt represents a loan he repurchased from a group of lenders. We dont assess any value to it because we dont care, Trump said. I have the mortgage. That is all there is. Very simple. I am the bank. Jason Greenblatt, who was then the Trump Organizations top lawyer, declined to explain to the Times the reason for the Chicago Unit Acquisition deal. Its really personal corporate trade secrets, if you will, he said. Neither newsworthy or frankly anybodys business.
https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2019/09/donald-trump-has-never-explained-a-mysterious-50-million-chicago-unit-acquisition-loan-is-it-evidence-of-tax-fraud/
-snip-
Trumps finances are currently the subject of multiple inquiries in his home state of New York. Following the New York Times investigation of the questionable tax schemes employed by Trump and his family, a spokesperson for the New York Department of Taxation and Finance said the agency was vigorously pursuing all appropriate avenues of investigation. New York Attorney General Letitia James has also been scrutinizing the financing of several Trump projects. This investigation was sparked by Michael Cohen, Trumps former lawyer and fixer, who told Congress earlier this year that Trump had inflated his assets on financial statements used to secure loans. In March, James subpoenaed records from Deutsche Bank concerning multiple Trump ventures, including the Trump Chicago project. Her office declined to comment on whether it had subpoenaed Fortress or planned to do so in the future, but James tells Mother Jones in a statement: My office takes any allegations of significant tax fraud seriously. No one is above the lawnot even the president of the United States.
LOCK HIS ASS UP.......................................and throw away the fucking key.....................
Blue Owl
(50,338 posts)erronis
(15,219 posts)That question should be asked in a court of law with said defendant standing in the docket.