General Discussion

Hugabear

(10,340 posts) Fri Aug 31, 2012, 12:50 AM Aug 2012

So is Mitt going to debate against an empty chair?

Seems about the only way he'll have a chance of winning.

I can just imagine Paul Ryan high-fiving him afterwards, telling him how great he did.

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

So is Mitt going to debate against an empty chair? (Original Post) Hugabear Aug 2012 OP

Seems to be their plan. Can anyone really blame them? Lone_Star_Dem Aug 2012 #1

He'd still lose the debate rbrnmw Aug 2012 #2

Invisible Obama will still have better answers Jennicut Aug 2012 #3

Empty suit debates empty chair Raster Aug 2012 #4

The chair would still have more personality. nt justanidea Aug 2012 #5

Willard IS an empty chair. Zoeisright Aug 2012 #6

Lone_Star_Dem

(28,158 posts)

1. Seems to be their plan. Can anyone really blame them?

Reply to Hugabear (Original post)

Fri Aug 31, 2012, 12:51 AM

Aug 2012

I mean, he has all those "things" he doesn't want to talk about. It's the only safe out.

rbrnmw

(7,160 posts)

2. He'd still lose the debate

Reply to Hugabear (Original post)

Fri Aug 31, 2012, 12:52 AM

Aug 2012

Jennicut

(25,415 posts)

3. Invisible Obama will still have better answers

Reply to rbrnmw (Reply #2)

Fri Aug 31, 2012, 12:59 AM

Aug 2012

to any debate questions!

Raster

(20,998 posts)

4. Empty suit debates empty chair

Reply to Hugabear (Original post)

Fri Aug 31, 2012, 12:59 AM

Aug 2012

justanidea

(291 posts)

5. The chair would still have more personality. nt

Reply to Hugabear (Original post)

Fri Aug 31, 2012, 01:26 AM

Aug 2012

Zoeisright

(8,339 posts)

6. Willard IS an empty chair.

Reply to Hugabear (Original post)

Fri Aug 31, 2012, 01:27 AM

Aug 2012

No substance, no character, no ideas, no morals. Just a stiff piece of plastic.

Reply to this discussion