Sun Aug 11, 2019, 01:11 PM
Claritie Pixie (2,197 posts)
Remember when Barr recused himself from the Epstein case?
Because of past family connections to Epstein?
Then changed his mind shortly thereafter? Someone gave him a talking-to and forced him to un-recuse. Why was it so important - and to whom - that Barr remain involved?
|
22 replies, 4948 views
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
Claritie Pixie | Aug 2019 | OP |
underthematrix | Aug 2019 | #1 | |
Claritie Pixie | Aug 2019 | #2 | |
lapfog_1 | Aug 2019 | #7 | |
Hekate | Aug 2019 | #10 | |
Ilsa | Aug 2019 | #14 | |
Claritie Pixie | Aug 2019 | #17 | |
PandoraAwakened | Aug 2019 | #21 | |
sandensea | Aug 2019 | #12 | |
KPN | Aug 2019 | #3 | |
marble falls | Aug 2019 | #4 | |
FM123 | Aug 2019 | #5 | |
Miles Archer | Aug 2019 | #6 | |
YOHABLO | Aug 2019 | #8 | |
PufPuf23 | Aug 2019 | #9 | |
KPN | Aug 2019 | #11 | |
Ilsa | Aug 2019 | #15 | |
underthematrix | Aug 2019 | #16 | |
PufPuf23 | Aug 2019 | #19 | |
Meadowoak | Aug 2019 | #18 | |
PufPuf23 | Aug 2019 | #20 | |
kentuck | Aug 2019 | #13 | |
JI7 | Aug 2019 | #22 |
Response to Claritie Pixie (Original post)
Sun Aug 11, 2019, 01:13 PM
underthematrix (5,686 posts)
1. Yes. yes. yes. So here's what we should be asking.
Response to underthematrix (Reply #1)
Sun Aug 11, 2019, 01:14 PM
Claritie Pixie (2,197 posts)
2. Agree.
Response to underthematrix (Reply #1)
Sun Aug 11, 2019, 02:09 PM
lapfog_1 (26,593 posts)
7. I haven't seen the photo on the left...
who is the "woman" in the photo... when was it taken? How old was she?
never mind...Ivanka... omg she was young and dressed like someone much older. Not as creepy as some I've seen of her... but yikes. |
Response to lapfog_1 (Reply #7)
Sun Aug 11, 2019, 02:37 PM
Hekate (76,194 posts)
10. Daddy's Little Princess was sexualized early
Response to lapfog_1 (Reply #7)
Sun Aug 11, 2019, 03:12 PM
Ilsa (59,329 posts)
14. Donald's date, courtesy of Epstein. nt
Response to lapfog_1 (Reply #7)
Sun Aug 11, 2019, 03:30 PM
Claritie Pixie (2,197 posts)
17. Look at how he's "holding" her hand. He's got a vice-like grip on it and she's not holding his back.
Plus her face looks blank. Nothing there.
|
Response to lapfog_1 (Reply #7)
Mon Aug 12, 2019, 05:27 AM
PandoraAwakened (905 posts)
21. Wow, Ivanka looks just like...
...an underage Eastern European sex slave. Wonder where daddy ever got the idea to dress her up like that?
|
Response to underthematrix (Reply #1)
Sun Aug 11, 2019, 03:04 PM
sandensea (16,217 posts)
12. And who had the power to make it happen in the first place.
|
Response to Claritie Pixie (Original post)
Sun Aug 11, 2019, 01:14 PM
KPN (13,529 posts)
3. Gee, I wonder ....
![]() |
Response to Claritie Pixie (Original post)
Sun Aug 11, 2019, 01:15 PM
marble falls (45,632 posts)
4. Co conspirator #1.
Response to Claritie Pixie (Original post)
Sun Aug 11, 2019, 01:35 PM
FM123 (9,466 posts)
5. Barr was "partially" recused, I guess....
While it was once thought that Barr would be recusing himself from having oversight on the Epstein prosecution, on July 9, it was clarified that Barr consulted with career ethics officials at the department, and concluded that he only needed to recuse himself from the internal Justice Department probe of Labor Secretary Alex Acosta, and his involvement of approving a highly controversial no-prosecution deal with Epstein back in the 2008.
Barr did not recuse himself from Epstein’s current prosecution in Manhattan, and is now instructing the Department of Justice’s inspector general to open a probe into the disgraced financier’s death. Before Epstein’s alleged suicide, he was facing 45 years in prison if convicted of conspiracy and sex trafficking dozens of underage girls in New York and Florida. There is concern over William Barr’s involvement in Epstein’s case, not only for the way he handled Robert Mueller’s testimony over the Russian probe, but because of his personal ties with Epstein himself. https://heavy.com/news/2019/08/william-barrs-personal-ties-jeffrey-epstein/ |
Response to FM123 (Reply #5)
Sun Aug 11, 2019, 01:49 PM
Miles Archer (18,521 posts)
6. Yep. Read about that yesterday.
Uncle Bill's on it.
|
Response to Claritie Pixie (Original post)
Sun Aug 11, 2019, 02:12 PM
YOHABLO (7,358 posts)
8. Because Epstein had the dirt on Trump. What else could it be?
Response to Claritie Pixie (Original post)
Sun Aug 11, 2019, 02:24 PM
PufPuf23 (7,675 posts)
9. Barr and Epstein likely have a decades long personal acquaintance.
Last edited Sun Aug 11, 2019, 05:18 PM - Edit history (1) Barr born 1950, Epstein born 1950. Edit Epstein born 1953.
Barr's father hired Epstein age 20 (William Barr then 23) to teach math at Dalton School. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dalton_School |
Response to PufPuf23 (Reply #9)
Sun Aug 11, 2019, 02:54 PM
KPN (13,529 posts)
11. Wait. Born the same year but Epstein was hired
by Barr’s dad when he was 20 and Barr 23?
|
Response to KPN (Reply #11)
Sun Aug 11, 2019, 03:14 PM
Ilsa (59,329 posts)
15. I don't think Epstein got a college degree.
He may have gotten a degree of STD, but no PhD.
|
Response to Ilsa (Reply #15)
Sun Aug 11, 2019, 03:29 PM
underthematrix (5,686 posts)
16. Epstein didn't have an AA, BA, BS, MS, MA, M.Ed or PhD
Response to KPN (Reply #11)
Sun Aug 11, 2019, 05:17 PM
PufPuf23 (7,675 posts)
19. That was a mistake by me. Epstein born 1953 Wm Barr born 1950
Point is that Epstein age 20 came to work at Dalton School where Wm Barr's father was headmaster. Wm Barr was then 23 and likely became acquainted with Epstein initially at that times.
|
Response to PufPuf23 (Reply #9)
Sun Aug 11, 2019, 04:08 PM
Meadowoak (1,919 posts)
18. Epstein was born in 1953.
Response to Meadowoak (Reply #18)
Sun Aug 11, 2019, 05:19 PM
PufPuf23 (7,675 posts)
20. I goofed and just fixed. Thank you. nt
Response to Claritie Pixie (Original post)
Sun Aug 11, 2019, 03:10 PM
kentuck (105,185 posts)
13. He does seem to have some interest in the case...
doesn't he?
![]() |
Response to Claritie Pixie (Original post)
Mon Aug 12, 2019, 05:32 AM
JI7 (86,295 posts)
22. People kept thinking Barr wanted to work for Trump because of some strong opinion on Laws
and the power of the presidency and other legal shit.
but i think it's more likely that it was all about protecting themselves . |