Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

meegbear

(25,438 posts)
Thu Jan 5, 2012, 12:50 PM Jan 2012

Rude Pundit:Right-Wingers and Obama's Recess Appointments:Now It's Imperial to Just Execute the Laws

Man, the Nancies of the right have their panties all bunched up into their ass cracks over President Obama's recess appointments of Richard Cordray to head the Consumer Financial Bureau and of three members of the National Labor Relations Board, just so those agencies can actually function. They're screeching like Real Housewives being told that surgery to remove their melanoma might leave scars.

The New York Post, in an editorial charmingly titled "King Barack's Power Grab," wept, "President Obama yesterday played a violent game of kickball with the US Constitution, making a number of high-level “recess” appointments — even though the Senate isn’t actually in recess." Ahh, there's the outrage. See, the Senate is doing the pro forma dance, making sure that someone walks into the chamber and bangs a gavel every three days so that it's never actually "in recess." That's in the Constitution, Article 1, Section 5: "Neither House, during the Session of Congress, shall, without the Consent of the other, adjourn for more than three days."

But, see, Obama, with approval from his lawyers, said, "You know what? Fuck that shit. Let's play." The Wall Street Journal sniffled, "In this case, the House of Representatives had not formally consented to Senate adjournment. It's true the House did this to block the President from making recess appointments, but it is following the Constitution in doing so...Democrats had used a similar process to try to thwart Mr. Bush's recess appointments late in his term when they controlled both the House and the Senate...Majority Leader Harry Reid kept the Senate in pro forma session. Some advisers urged Mr. Bush to ignore the Senate and make recess appointments anyway, but he declined."

Ahh, now there's the ass-kick. Bush didn't try it. In other words, Republicans and their right-wing media lackeys are pissed because they're jealous. Oh, sure, it's totally okay for Senate Republicans to have used the filibuster in an unprecedented way to change the very process of bills have to be voted on. That's kosher. But this? Well, that's just way too dickish only because they didn't get to do it first. Harry Reid must be laughing his glasses off.

Oh, and then there's this from Article 2, Section 3 of the Constitution: " (The President) may, on extraordinary Occasions, convene both Houses, or either of them, and in Case of Disagreement between them, with Respect to the Time of Adjournment, he may adjourn them to such Time as he shall think proper." And a disagreement is exactly what happened: the Democratic Senate asked the Republican House to adjourn. The House declined and thus the cycle of pro forma sessions started. Thus the President can invoke this power. It exists in case Congress becomes too dysfunctional, like, you know, it is, thanks to the GOP. (Right now, this section is not the legal reasoning being put forth by the White House, which is simply asserting that the pro forma sessions do not mean Congress is in session.)

And if Obama is feeling particularly pissy, the Constitution actually says that he can keep the Congress adjourned as long as he damn well pleases.

The sad part is that Obama is doing this just because he wants to fulfill another clause of Article 2, Section 3. That says the President "shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed." Republicans were blocking nominees in these specific positions because it didn't want the laws that previous congresses had passed to be executed. Instead of attempting to overturn the laws through the, you know, legislative process, they were just obstructionist cocks. Once again, to get the merest of things done, President Obama had to slap those erect pricks out of his face and tell their owners that he was done sucking them off, and that the Republicans can go fuck themselves.

(For extra fun, check out torture-enabler John Yoo being a total douchebomb about the recess appointments.)

http://rudepundit.blogspot.com/

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Rude Pundit:Right-Wingers and Obama's Recess Appointments:Now It's Imperial to Just Execute the Laws (Original Post) meegbear Jan 2012 OP
Yoo's article reads like one of those late-night class action lawsuit ads. Bolo Boffin Jan 2012 #1
This is what a spine looks like! Kick their asses, Mr. President! Odin2005 Jan 2012 #2
i find it quite disgusting barbtries Jan 2012 #3
I learned something. Didn't know POTUS could adjourn Congress (albeit conditionally). yodermon Jan 2012 #4
Theoretically, yes. In practice? TheWraith Jan 2012 #5

Bolo Boffin

(23,796 posts)
1. Yoo's article reads like one of those late-night class action lawsuit ads.
Thu Jan 5, 2012, 12:56 PM
Jan 2012

"Are you being protected by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau? You might be entitled to a settlement!"

barbtries

(28,703 posts)
3. i find it quite disgusting
Thu Jan 5, 2012, 01:17 PM
Jan 2012

that Yoo writes about legal matters as if he deserves any respect whatsoever.

other than that, thank you! love the rude pundit.

yodermon

(6,143 posts)
4. I learned something. Didn't know POTUS could adjourn Congress (albeit conditionally).
Thu Jan 5, 2012, 01:30 PM
Jan 2012

"and in Case of Disagreement between them, with Respect to the Time of Adjournment, he may adjourn them to such Time as he shall think proper"

another trump card.

TheWraith

(24,331 posts)
5. Theoretically, yes. In practice?
Thu Jan 5, 2012, 01:36 PM
Jan 2012

In practice, this power has never actually been used by any president ever, so it would probably end up in some kind of turf fight, as opposed to a quick and orderly adjournment.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Rude Pundit:Right-Wingers...