Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
Wed Aug 29, 2012, 01:36 PM Aug 2012

Jane Romney on abortion, "Mitt won't touch that".



Mitt Romney's eldest sister, who has backed prominent Democrats for office and is Tampa showing support for her brother, had some reassuring words Wednesday for women concerned about the Republican Party's hard line on abortion.

Mitt Romney would never make abortions illegal as president, Jane Romney said when National Journal asked her about the subject after a "Women for Mitt" event. "He's not going to be touching any of that," she said. "It's not his focus."

http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2012/08/jane-romney-mitt-would-never-ban-abortion/261730/


“And I will nominate judges who know the difference between personal opinion and law. It is long past time for the Supreme Court to return the issue of abortion back to the states by overturning Roe v. Wade.”

http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/10/08/romney-tries-to-reassure-socially-conservative-audience/
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Jane Romney on abortion, "Mitt won't touch that". (Original Post) Warren Stupidity Aug 2012 OP
Once again, kids.... rgbecker Aug 2012 #1
I don't give a shit what Mitt's oldest sister thinks. Atman Aug 2012 #2
He won't touch it . . . madashelltoo Aug 2012 #3
I have every reason not to believe you, Ms. Romney Lucy Goosey Aug 2012 #4
Everyone with a Facebook account should share this, IMHO. FedUpWithIt All Aug 2012 #5
That's a really good point Lucy Goosey Aug 2012 #7
Six of one and half a dozen of the other...means that no one either side of the issues Skidmore Aug 2012 #6
That quote from 2011 in the NYT is really essential. enough Aug 2012 #8
Sorry Jane, but your brother is an ass who is beholden to the right wingers, so if he wins WI_DEM Aug 2012 #9
Maybe not his focus Proud Liberal Dem Aug 2012 #10
Bullshit ProudToBeBlueInRhody Aug 2012 #11
Another wink-wink moment from hypocritical Repukelicons... joeybee12 Aug 2012 #12

Atman

(31,464 posts)
2. I don't give a shit what Mitt's oldest sister thinks.
Wed Aug 29, 2012, 01:39 PM
Aug 2012

I'm sure my sister would say wonderful things about me, too, if asked.

All I'm concerned about are his actions. He flip flops like a landed trout. One position one day, another position the next. The truth is, Mitt will do whatever he has to on any given day in order to "close the deal." If that means he has to sign a ban on abortion in order to get his tax rate reduced, he'll do it in a heartbeat. A heartbeat from a man with no heart...or soul.

.

madashelltoo

(1,696 posts)
3. He won't touch it . . .
Wed Aug 29, 2012, 01:41 PM
Aug 2012

he'll just leave a trail of bread crumbs for the judges he appoints to the Supreme Court to follow. Beat it, Jane.

Lucy Goosey

(2,940 posts)
4. I have every reason not to believe you, Ms. Romney
Wed Aug 29, 2012, 01:46 PM
Aug 2012

Your brother clearly changes his views on this and other issues depending on whichever view is most politically expedient at the time he is espousing it. Add to that the make-all-abortions-illegal party platform and running mate, and you'll have to forgive me for calling your bullshit.

FedUpWithIt All

(4,442 posts)
5. Everyone with a Facebook account should share this, IMHO.
Wed Aug 29, 2012, 01:52 PM
Aug 2012

There are a LOT of people who will hear that and then question their vote for ol' Mitt if his own sister is saying he has no interest in shutting down abortions.

Divide and conquer...

Lucy Goosey

(2,940 posts)
7. That's a really good point
Wed Aug 29, 2012, 01:59 PM
Aug 2012

I initially thought of this from my pro-choice point of view, but you're absolutely right that the pro-"life" set won't appreciate this.

Skidmore

(37,364 posts)
6. Six of one and half a dozen of the other...means that no one either side of the issues
Wed Aug 29, 2012, 01:57 PM
Aug 2012

can trust this man's word. Bottom line is that he is a liar and untrustworthy.

WI_DEM

(33,497 posts)
9. Sorry Jane, but your brother is an ass who is beholden to the right wingers, so if he wins
Wed Aug 29, 2012, 02:19 PM
Aug 2012

he will do their bidding.

Proud Liberal Dem

(24,406 posts)
10. Maybe not his focus
Wed Aug 29, 2012, 02:21 PM
Aug 2012

However, assuming that a Republican Congress follows him in (perish the thought), what will he do when they present him with anti-choice bills or bills defunding Planned Parenthood? What kind of people will he nominate for SCOTUS? Republicans will demand clearly anti-choice nominees.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Jane Romney on abortion, ...