Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
Thu Jun 20, 2019, 08:18 AM Jun 2019

'That will not stand': Democrats plan next steps after ex-Trump aide Hope Hicks didn't answer key qu

WASHINGTON – Democratic lawmakers accused President Donald Trump's former aide Hope Hicks of rejecting questions about her time in the White House during a marathon hearing on Wednesday.

While Democrats aimed to unearth new aspects of Hicks' role in the White House, which spanned some of the most controversial moments of Trump's presidency, both sides of the aisle seemed to agree that very little, if anything, was learned from the all-day testimony. But despite the roadblock, Democrats vowed that their fight was only beginning, one that would likely go to court, so key officials may testify before lawmakers.
.....................................................


Congressional Democrats on the committee said Hicks’ appearance amounted to her not complying with the subpoena. They claimed she did not answer questions about her time in the White House or the findings outlined in the Mueller report. Lawyers for the administration, who were at Hicks' side during her testimony, objected to question after question, claiming she was immune from answering anything related to her time in the White House, Democrats said.


https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/06/19/hope-hicks-testify-congress-robert-muellers-report-trump-administration/1486526001/
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
'That will not stand': Democrats plan next steps after ex-Trump aide Hope Hicks didn't answer key qu (Original Post) ehrnst Jun 2019 OP
Post removed Post removed Jun 2019 #1
When do they 'go to court'? Today? spanone Jun 2019 #2
You would have to check with the court, and with the lawyers prepping the case. ehrnst Jun 2019 #3
Bwahahahahaaa... spanone Jun 2019 #4
Yes, the Congress did look weak... kentuck Jun 2019 #5
How so? I didn't see the proceedings. ehrnst Jun 2019 #6
I guess there's no need for any more witnesses until the courts have ruled? kentuck Jun 2019 #8
I decline to answer Bayard Jun 2019 #7

Response to ehrnst (Original post)

 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
3. You would have to check with the court, and with the lawyers prepping the case.
Thu Jun 20, 2019, 09:13 AM
Jun 2019

Let us know when you find out....

 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
6. How so? I didn't see the proceedings.
Thu Jun 20, 2019, 09:36 AM
Jun 2019

Can you post a link?

But can you tell me what you know that Ted Lieu doesn't? He was there. But what does he know about all this?




kentuck

(111,052 posts)
8. I guess there's no need for any more witnesses until the courts have ruled?
Thu Jun 20, 2019, 12:26 PM
Jun 2019

Nadler looked tired. A reporter asked a question and he mumbled something as he was walking away from the microphone. I don't know how much the Courts can help them. There is a balance of powers for a reason.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»'That will not stand': De...