Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kpete

(71,981 posts)
Wed Jun 19, 2019, 05:59 PM Jun 2019

BREAKING: Judge Wants Another Crack At Census Case After Revelation Of New Evidence

...........

The new evidence being put forward by the challengers were in files found on the back-up hard drives of a now-deceased GOP gerrymandering guru. The files suggested he was more involved in the Trump’s administration’s census change than originally thought. Among them was also a secret study the consultant, Thomas Hofeller, did in 2015 that said adding a citizenship question to the census would be necessary for the GOP to overhaul redistricting in a way that would boost Republicans and non-Hispanic whites to the detriment of Democrats.

Hazel’s order Wednesday was brief and did not say what next steps would be taken if the appeals court sent the case back down to him. He indicated he will issue a longer opinion explaining his decision at a later date.

Hazel had previously ruled that the administration’s move to add the question violated administrative law and was also a violation of the Constitution’s Enumeration Clause, because it would harm the accuracy of the census. The administration had appealed those two findings, while one of the groups challenging the question in Maryland had appealed his ruling that the question was not a violation of the equal protection clause.

“Judge Hazel’s ruling is a confirmation that the evidence we have submitted raises a substantial question as to the intentionally discriminatory actions of this administration,” said Denise Hulett, an attorney with group MALDEF, which challenged the question. “The evidence shows an undeniable conspiracy between this administration and others outside the government to jeopardize the accuracy of the census for partisan gain at the expense of Latinos and non citizens of color.”


MORE:
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/muckraker/breaking-judge-wants-another-crack-at-census-case-after-revelation-of-new-evidence

19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
BREAKING: Judge Wants Another Crack At Census Case After Revelation Of New Evidence (Original Post) kpete Jun 2019 OP
K&R rogue emissary Jun 2019 #1
K&R tableturner Jun 2019 #2
This is huge malaise Jun 2019 #3
K&R... spanone Jun 2019 #4
Thank you Judge Hazel saidsimplesimon Jun 2019 #5
I.O.W. Republicans cheat Botany Jun 2019 #6
I believe the judicial branch is going to save us FakeNoose Jun 2019 #7
There IS hope bluestarone Jun 2019 #8
The judge must not know we have a Supreme Court in this country. former9thward Jun 2019 #9
The Supreme Court could remand the matter back to the District Court gratuitous Jun 2019 #11
Very doubtful. former9thward Jun 2019 #13
Great!! Thekaspervote Jun 2019 #10
BAM! dchill Jun 2019 #12
K&R! gademocrat7 Jun 2019 #14
K and R. warmfeet Jun 2019 #15
Maybe for a change right will prevail. PatrickforO Jun 2019 #16
Excellent. KnR Hekate Jun 2019 #17
K&R... N_E_1 for Tennis Jun 2019 #18
K & R MFGsunny Jun 2019 #19

former9thward

(31,970 posts)
9. The judge must not know we have a Supreme Court in this country.
Wed Jun 19, 2019, 06:46 PM
Jun 2019

The Supreme Court has heard the case and will issue a decision by the end of this month. That decision will be binding no matter what Judge Hazel may think.

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
11. The Supreme Court could remand the matter back to the District Court
Wed Jun 19, 2019, 06:58 PM
Jun 2019

That sometimes happens, particularly if the Court decides the record it's reviewing isn't complete, and further development of the facts is needed. The discovery of the Hofeller material might warrant remand for further consideration and development of the record by the District Court.

former9thward

(31,970 posts)
13. Very doubtful.
Wed Jun 19, 2019, 07:08 PM
Jun 2019

The SC fast tracked this case because they needed to decide it by this month so forms can be put together and printed. I believe you will find them giving a final decision this month.

PatrickforO

(14,569 posts)
16. Maybe for a change right will prevail.
Wed Jun 19, 2019, 08:35 PM
Jun 2019

Cause sometimes that arc of justice seems to move awful goddamn slow.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»BREAKING: Judge Wants Ano...