Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

applegrove

(118,609 posts)
Wed Jun 19, 2019, 01:35 AM Jun 2019

GOP senator introduces bill to hold online platforms liable for political bias

GOP senator introduces bill to hold online platforms liable for political bias

https://thehill.com/policy/technology/449241-gop-senator-introduces-bill-to-hold-online-platforms-liable-for-political

Emily Birnbaum at the Hill

"SNIP.....

Hawley on Wednesday will introduce a bill requiring companies to prove they are politically "neutral" before they receive protections under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (CDA), which largely gives internet platforms legal immunity over content posted on their sites by third parties.  

The Missouri Republican's legislation comes after Republican lawmakers for more than a year have threatened to gut Section 230 over allegations that the top social media companies in the world are biased against conservatives, a claim that the tech companies have categorically denied and say has not been substantiated by any evidence. 

The Ending Support for Internet Censorship Act would require "big tech companies" to submit to external audits conducted by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to prove their algorithms and content moderation practices are not biased against either U.S. political party. It would require the companies to undergo audits every two years.

"Big" tech companies in the bill are defined as those with more than 30 million active monthly users in the U.S., m ore than 300 million active monthly suers worldwide, or companies with more than $500 million in global annual revenue. 



.....SNIP"

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

applegrove

(118,609 posts)
1. How about being truthful? Does that have a bias? We know it does. Facts
Wed Jun 19, 2019, 01:35 AM
Jun 2019

Last edited Wed Jun 19, 2019, 02:09 AM - Edit history (1)

having a liberal bias is old news by now.

applegrove

(118,609 posts)
6. Yes. Point is will the right stop at nothing to ensure their lies get equal time with
Wed Jun 19, 2019, 02:31 AM
Jun 2019

The truth. I mean what is the DU supposed to do? Are they allowed to exist?.

RockRaven

(14,958 posts)
2. Twitter already admitted their bias in favor of Repukes -- they won't ban white nationalism speech
Wed Jun 19, 2019, 01:45 AM
Jun 2019

because it would sweep up too many Repuke politicians. They actually claimed they could not automate hate-speech blocking because it would catch too many GOPers... Think about that next time any of you feel inclined to link a tweet on DU.

This proposal is gas-lighting and misinformation. Don't waste your time arguing with MAGAts on this topic.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»GOP senator introduces bi...