HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Hope Hicks

Sun May 26, 2019, 03:48 PM

 

Hope Hicks


44 replies, 9886 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 44 replies Author Time Post
Reply Hope Hicks (Original post)
SHRED May 2019 OP
Dennis Donovan May 2019 #1
mcar May 2019 #2
NoMoreRepugs May 2019 #6
erronis May 2019 #9
Backseat Driver May 2019 #3
EveHammond13 May 2019 #4
Grasswire2 May 2019 #5
dalton99a May 2019 #8
sop May 2019 #10
SeattleVet May 2019 #19
sop May 2019 #22
Progressive Jones May 2019 #33
whathehell May 2019 #42
xxqqqzme May 2019 #21
dalton99a May 2019 #7
spanone May 2019 #11
PatrickforO May 2019 #12
dmr May 2019 #13
Billy Ray Joe Bob. May 2019 #14
LineReply !
Marcuse May 2019 #15
patphil May 2019 #16
whathehell May 2019 #37
CDerekGo May 2019 #17
BlancheSplanchnik May 2019 #18
LittleGirl May 2019 #20
whathehell May 2019 #23
JI7 May 2019 #24
StarfishSaver May 2019 #25
whathehell May 2019 #34
StarfishSaver May 2019 #35
whathehell May 2019 #38
StarfishSaver May 2019 #39
whathehell May 2019 #41
StarfishSaver May 2019 #43
whathehell May 2019 #44
EffieBlack May 2019 #40
EffieBlack May 2019 #36
extvbroadcaster May 2019 #26
spanone May 2019 #27
uponit7771 May 2019 #28
orangecrush May 2019 #29
calimary May 2019 #30
saidsimplesimon May 2019 #31
corbettkroehler May 2019 #32

Response to SHRED (Original post)

Sun May 26, 2019, 03:49 PM

1. BAM!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SHRED (Original post)

Sun May 26, 2019, 03:50 PM

2. NYT strikes again

Another Trumpco puff piece.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to mcar (Reply #2)

Sun May 26, 2019, 04:50 PM

6. THIS.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to mcar (Reply #2)

Sun May 26, 2019, 05:14 PM

9. For reference to Maggie/NYT

A great thread rebutting Maggie Haberman's Hope Hicks story
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100212131762

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SHRED (Original post)

Sun May 26, 2019, 03:59 PM

3. Truth in sarcasm noted n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SHRED (Original post)

Sun May 26, 2019, 04:22 PM

4. she is living with wife-beater Rob Porter in NYC

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SHRED (Original post)

Sun May 26, 2019, 04:45 PM

5. Is she still getting paid by the RNC? Or working for a media enterprise?

Can't keep up.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Grasswire2 (Reply #5)

Sun May 26, 2019, 05:08 PM

8. She is chief communications officer and executive vice president at Fox

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to dalton99a (Reply #8)

Sun May 26, 2019, 05:38 PM

10. Proof, yet again, we live in a true meritocracy

n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to sop (Reply #10)

Sun May 26, 2019, 11:32 PM

19. Meritocracy?

Where was the /s (sarcasm) tag?

I think that the proper word is 'kakistocracy' (a system of government that is run by the worst, least qualified, or most unscrupulous citizens).

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SeattleVet (Reply #19)

Mon May 27, 2019, 12:41 AM

22. What? You don't believe this 30-year-old former fashion model and party girl

landed a job as White House Communications Director, then as chief communications officer and executive vice president for FOX, for any reason other than her emminent qualifications? Some cynics might say it was because Hope was so good at steam pressing Trump's suit and pants as he wore them, but I certainly don't believe that.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to sop (Reply #22)

Mon May 27, 2019, 01:52 PM

33. She blew right into that job with ease... nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to sop (Reply #22)

Mon May 27, 2019, 09:02 PM

42. Maybe you should blame the stupid men who hired her,

then, instead of her for having the temerity to be pretty?...Just a thought.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to sop (Reply #10)

Mon May 27, 2019, 12:30 AM

21. Oh, I initially read

that as mediocrity.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SHRED (Original post)

Sun May 26, 2019, 05:07 PM

7. Kick

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SHRED (Original post)

Sun May 26, 2019, 06:01 PM

11. 👍🏼Jeff

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SHRED (Original post)

Sun May 26, 2019, 06:19 PM

12. I like that Tiedrich better every time I see one of his tweets. n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SHRED (Original post)

Sun May 26, 2019, 06:21 PM

13. Ain't that the truth

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SHRED (Original post)

Sun May 26, 2019, 06:31 PM

14. Broken system

 

Our justice system is broken. Imagine the average person saying, 'nope I ain't coming, screw that subpoen'. You would be behind bars so fast.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SHRED (Original post)

Sun May 26, 2019, 06:48 PM

15. !

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SHRED (Original post)

Sun May 26, 2019, 08:17 PM

16. Now now, don't be too hard on the girl

she's just ethically and morally challenged.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to patphil (Reply #16)

Mon May 27, 2019, 08:35 PM

37. Nah

let's trash the girls!, especially the pretty ones -- they're easy targets, and much more "morally challenged" than the Trump boys, anyway, right?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SHRED (Original post)

Sun May 26, 2019, 09:10 PM

17. Often wondered

How these folks who ignored Congressional Subpoena's would ultimately be handled. Jailed, slap on the wrist, Arrested, but turned loose within minutes, only gaining time in front of the tv cameras?

But as Mr Tiedrich has stated, no POC have so far been subpoenaed, but then again, I'm talking about 45's staff, besides Omarosa, that could never occur.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SHRED (Original post)

Sun May 26, 2019, 09:51 PM

18. Getting real sick of this slide into a feudalistic society. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SHRED (Original post)

Sun May 26, 2019, 11:33 PM

20. Have you ever seen a photo of her besides Don Jr?

She is the spitting image of his twin.
Begs the question of she is Don Jr's sister.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SHRED (Original post)

Mon May 27, 2019, 03:43 AM

23. Aw gee, Jeff, you're just a privileged white MAN..

You really think you're in a position to preach?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to whathehell (Reply #23)

Mon May 27, 2019, 04:00 AM

24. sure he can. he compared the way she is treated to the way a black person is

he didn't claim white men were the ones being treated unfairly.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to whathehell (Reply #23)

Mon May 27, 2019, 08:05 AM

25. Yes, he is

Who better to call out white privilege than another white person, man or woman?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to StarfishSaver (Reply #25)

Mon May 27, 2019, 08:02 PM

34. Men of ALL colers enjoy more privilege than Women of all colors

so the "better" person to call out a 'privileged white woman' is actually another white woman, not a 'privileged white man'..
His own internalized sexism may distort his viewpoint, and he's already got his work cut out for him with his own group.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to whathehell (Reply #34)

Mon May 27, 2019, 08:18 PM

35. Black men do NOT "enjoy more privilege than Women of all colors"

You should do some research to disabuse yourself of this false notion.

White people of any gender should call out other white people of any gender when obnoxiously exploit their white privilege they display white privilege.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to StarfishSaver (Reply #35)

Mon May 27, 2019, 08:41 PM

38. Black men in this country got the vote BEFORE white women

That's a fact, and I can document it -- Can you do the same with your assertion? -- I doubt it, but I invite you to try.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to whathehell (Reply #38)

Mon May 27, 2019, 08:49 PM

39. You're joking, right?

Yes, the Constitution was amended to guarantee a black man's right to vote 55 years before it was amended to guarantee women's right to vote.

But here's the thing ...

Once women got the right to vote, white women were able to vote immediately, without restrictions or impediments. They did not have to fight for the next 100 years to actually exercise that right, they didn't have to have an Act of Congress passed in order for them to be able to vote and they weren't lynched, beaten, forced to take literacy tests, pay poll taxes, run of town when they tried to register and endure countless other indignities and threats to their lives. Black men and black women did.

In fact, black men and women are STILL fighting for that right that white women take for granted.



Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to StarfishSaver (Reply #39)

Mon May 27, 2019, 08:58 PM

41. Not in the slightest..

FIFTY FIVE Years, is a very LONG Time to excercise a right denied to another supposedly "privileged' group, geographic 'impediments' notwithstanding.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to whathehell (Reply #41)

Mon May 27, 2019, 09:04 PM

43. "Geographic impediments"?

You mean Jim Crow, lynchings, beatings, torture, firebombings, and the like?

No big whoop, I guess. Especially since black people could have just moved somewhere else to get around those "geographic impediments."

If you're joking, it's not funny. If you're serious, I feel sorry for you.

Either way, I'm not going to waste any more of my time discussing this with you.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to StarfishSaver (Reply #43)

Mon May 27, 2019, 09:28 PM

44. I believe we were talking about voting rights?

My use of the word "geographic" refers to the Jim Crow assaults on the voting rights of the AA community in the South.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to whathehell (Reply #38)

Mon May 27, 2019, 08:52 PM

40. If you're gong to try to be a smartass

At least try to make sure you know what the hell you’re talking about.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to whathehell (Reply #34)

Mon May 27, 2019, 08:24 PM

36. You can't POSSIBLY be serious

At least not if you live in America and are paying the least bit of attention.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SHRED (Original post)

Mon May 27, 2019, 09:24 AM

26. So true

I hate those interviews with "Trump voters" - they are always asked inane questions and they come back with nonsense about supporting Trump as President or how great the economy is. How about asking them what would happen if THEY ignored a subpoena?
Well, they would be arrested and thrown in jail. But Trump and his cronies can ignore whatever law they want. So it's one standard for them, another for everybody else. How about asking Trump voters if THAT is OK?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SHRED (Original post)

Mon May 27, 2019, 09:33 AM

27. K&R...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SHRED (Original post)

Mon May 27, 2019, 12:10 PM

28. K&R,

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SHRED (Original post)

Mon May 27, 2019, 12:43 PM

29. Twitter thread...





?s=19

a couple examples...


?s=19



?s=19

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SHRED (Original post)

Mon May 27, 2019, 12:54 PM

30. I still think she got that job because she's a real looker.

I still think trump fancies making her a conquest. He likes having attractive women around him because it probably makes him feel virile. And he fancies taking them to bed. Especially her.

The first time I got a look at her, what crossed my mind was "he wants to ball her. Maybe hasn't had the opportunity, but I bet he sure wants to."

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to calimary (Reply #30)

Mon May 27, 2019, 01:19 PM

31. Nah, look at Kellyanne, medusa,

ugly hag, yet she is still in the "catbird" seat and the pretty bobble is history. This also applies to Steve Bannon. Evil has no gender preference.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SHRED (Original post)

Mon May 27, 2019, 01:45 PM

32. Obtructing-Justice-While-White

Alert law enforcement - there's a dangerous criminal in our midst. How do I know? She looks guilty!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread