HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Idaho just hard-Brexited ...

Thu May 16, 2019, 07:49 AM

Idaho just hard-Brexited itself

https://fee.org/articles/idaho-repealed-its-entire-regulatory-code-now-what/

This is psychotic

My friend and former student Paul Gerner suggested to me a few years ago that the federal government have a “regulatory reset.” The idea is that the government eliminates all regulations and then brings back the ones it decides it wants. Presumably, we would end up with substantially fewer regulations.

I loved the idea but it boggled my mind. How would that work? What would happen to certain industries and lots of people who depend on some degree of certainty in making their plans? And, of course, aside from the issue of how it would work, neither Paul nor I thought the federal government would ever do it.

I still think that. But James Broughel, a senior research fellow with the Mercatus Center, points out that that’s exactly what Idaho’s state government has just done. He writes:

Something rather remarkable just happened in Idaho. The state legislature opted to—in essence—repeal the entire state regulatory code. The cause may have been dysfunction across legislative chambers, but the result is serendipitous. A new governor is presented with an unprecedented opportunity to repeal an outdated and burdensome regulatory code and replace it with a more streamlined and sensible set of rules. Other states should be paying close attention.

6 replies, 995 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 6 replies Author Time Post
Reply Idaho just hard-Brexited itself (Original post)
Recursion May 16 OP
BSdetect May 16 #1
rzemanfl May 16 #5
Scoopster May 16 #2
enough May 16 #3
zipplewrath May 16 #4
2naSalit May 16 #6

Response to Recursion (Original post)

Thu May 16, 2019, 07:59 AM

1. Wait for the litigations to flow.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BSdetect (Reply #1)

Thu May 16, 2019, 09:13 AM

5. The plural of litigation usually is litigation.

Not always though.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Recursion (Original post)

Thu May 16, 2019, 08:04 AM

2. Absolutely NO!

This is the most ridiculous bullshit I've ever heard.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Recursion (Original post)

Thu May 16, 2019, 08:07 AM

3. The headline doesn't actually represent what happened.

Read the article.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to enough (Reply #3)

Thu May 16, 2019, 08:48 AM

4. What's the difference?

Instead, the legislature wrapped up an acrimonious session in April without passing a rule-reauthorization bill. As a result, come July 1, some 8,200 pages of regulations containing 736 chapters of state rules will expire. Any rules the governor opts to keep will have to be implemented as emergency regulations, and the legislature will consider them anew when it returns next January.


What distinction are you making?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to enough (Reply #3)

Thu May 16, 2019, 09:42 AM

6. +1

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread