Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Sun Mar 10, 2019, 09:12 AM Mar 2019

A mysterious payment to Paul Manafort's lawyer reveals a hidden chapter of Trump's 2016...

A mysterious payment to Paul Manafort’s lawyer reveals a hidden chapter of Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign

PUBLISHED AN HOUR AGO

Christina Wilkie
@CHRISTINAWILKIE

KEY POINTS

Recent court filings are shedding new light on a mysterious $125,000 payment to lawyers for Paul Manafort, paid by a firm that has not been identified until now.

The firm is called Multi Media Services Corporation, and its silent owner is Tony Fabrizio, a longtime Manafort associate and the chief pollster on Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign.

The route this money traveled, from its origin as a donation made to a pro-Trump political group, to its final destination in the bank account of Manafort’s attorney, offers a window into relationships Manafort built over decades.


WASHINGTON — Recent court filings from special counsel Robert Mueller shed new light on a mysterious payment to lawyers for Paul Manafort, the onetime chairman of Donald Trump’s presidential campaign.

The payment, for $125,000, was made in June 2017, halfway through Trump’s first year in office. But it wasn’t disclosed publicly until late last year, when prosecutors accused Manafort in court filings of repeatedly lying to them about where the money actually came from. Manafort was convicted in 2018 of tax evasion and bank fraud, and sentenced in Virginia on Thursday to 47 months in prison. He faces another sentencing next week in Washington, D.C.

In the world of presidential campaign fundraising, where millions of dollars are often raised and spent in a matter of weeks, $125,000 can seem like a drop in the bucket.

But the route this money traveled, from its origin as a donation made to a pro-Trump political group, to its final destination in the bank account of Manafort’s attorney, offers a rare glimpse into the inner workings of relationships Manafort built over 40 years in Republican politics.

more
https://www.cnbc.com/2019/03/10/paul-manafort-lawyer-mysterious-payment-hidden-chapter-of-trump-2016-campaign.html
13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

Perseus

(4,341 posts)
1. Maybe we will find a mysterious payment to the judge as well?
Sun Mar 10, 2019, 10:22 AM
Mar 2019

I would not doubt that. Judge Ellis should be under investigation.

 

DirtEdonE

(1,220 posts)
3. I'm thinking along the same lines as you and Perseus
Sun Mar 10, 2019, 10:37 AM
Mar 2019

How much money was laundered through this firm and this type of arrangement with other firms? They already mention a number of $19 million in the article to this firm alone! Some two-bit shell company set up by manafort and his criminal network companions for just such activities. Like paying off anyone who needs to be paid off. Federal judges included.

http://www.multi-media-services.com/

DemocracyMouse

(2,275 posts)
5. Judge Ellis did an unethical act in plain sight by cutting Manafort's sentence by 75% or so
Sun Mar 10, 2019, 10:58 AM
Mar 2019

He's doing a Trump and must be in up to his biased eyeballs.

 

DirtEdonE

(1,220 posts)
12. Former U.S. Attorney Jill Wine-Banks was on
Sun Mar 10, 2019, 02:46 PM
Mar 2019

I think it was Lawerence's show, saying exactly that - guilty defendants who show no cooperation, no remorse are supposed to face much harsher penalties on that basis alone!

This really is the breakdown of the judicial system. I refuse to call it a justice system any longer.

SWBTATTReg

(22,114 posts)
7. Thanks for posting DonViejo...this post with the cnbc article re the dirty money involved ...
Sun Mar 10, 2019, 11:46 AM
Mar 2019

with election campaigns is a stark reminder of why we don't want dirty or dark money in our elections. All this is, is just another way to launder dirty or dark money when our elections should be wide open and transparent. Apparently this whole crowd associated w/ Manifort and/or rump viewed this whole campaign financing process as a means to enrich themselves without (I'm guessing) paying income taxes and obtaining legal bribes.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A mysterious payment to P...