Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ck4829

(35,042 posts)
Thu Aug 23, 2012, 11:35 AM Aug 2012

National Review's "Real Men Don't Have Daughters" hits the rest of the Internet

The "Romney big strong man because he have many sons and give Obama fallopian tubes" is creating some interesting feedback.

"Oh, my. Romney, Williamson claims, is an "alpha executive," which means he leads a pack of executives through the wilderness and is given first dibs on any animals they kill. As if the grafting of lupine social structure onto a sub-Men Are From Mars understanding of gender was insufficient to explain the point, the reader is treated to a paragraph explaining that the gender of Romney's children — "five sons, zero daughters" — makes him a "high-status animal," a "tribal chieftain." (Obama, with his two daughters: "May as well give the guy a cardigan. And fallopian tubes.&quot This, again, is why "from an evolutionary point of view" all women should vote for Mitt Romney. Williamson is going to strain his jaw trying this hard to be tongue-in-cheek."

http://gawker.com/5936957/mitt-romney-could-have-a-harem-if-he-wanted-insists-national-review

"Now all Romney needs is to go down to Crawford and have George W. Bush take him out to clear some brush, then maybe try on a flight suit and work on his strut."

http://prospect.org/article/mitt-romney-sexy-man

"Mitt Romney would not last even one day "roaming the veldt." I am pretty sure that he would have a complete nervous breakdown at the sight of a callus."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/22/mitt-romney-female-vote-national-review_n_1822470.html

"Women will like what I tell them to like."
- Homer Simpson

18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
2. Gosh. So why did his own sons need to have IVF?
Thu Aug 23, 2012, 11:37 AM
Aug 2012

From Mother Jones:

In May, Romney's son Tagg became father of twin boys thanks to help from IVF and a surrogate mother. Tagg's son Jonathan was also produced this way. Two of Tagg's brothers reportedly have struggled with infertility issues and resorted to IVF as well. It's hard to imagine that Romney will score any points with voters by tapping a running mate whose anti-abortion views are so extreme that Romney's own kids can't live with them.

http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2012/08/paul-ryan-abortion-ivf-romney-kids-criminals

The Magistrate

(95,244 posts)
4. Kind Of Makes You Wonder Whose Kids Those Are, Sir, Eh...?
Thu Aug 23, 2012, 12:02 PM
Aug 2012

"For our Mother says you're our Father...and that's good enough for us!"

Ikonoklast

(23,973 posts)
5. Real Men's sons aren't sterile.
Thu Aug 23, 2012, 12:04 PM
Aug 2012

Seems that some of Romney's progeny is genetically defective in the reproductive area.

CatWoman

(79,295 posts)
7. could be from all the inbreeding that occurred during Grandpa Romney's excellent adventures
Thu Aug 23, 2012, 12:10 PM
Aug 2012

in Mexico.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
9. Maybe that's why all the wives.
Thu Aug 23, 2012, 12:15 PM
Aug 2012

It's weird, though, when the family tree doesn't have any branches.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
3. This, again, is why "from an evolutionary point of view" all women should
Thu Aug 23, 2012, 11:58 AM
Aug 2012

say... fuck this evolutionary psych bullshit the men are promoting so hard because it is all about misogyny.

 

HockeyMom

(14,337 posts)
6. "I like DAUGHTERS"
Thu Aug 23, 2012, 12:07 PM
Aug 2012

That is what he used to tell people when they would ask him when were we going to try for a boy (2 daughters). Well for a Republican, he gets some things right once in a while.

exboyfil

(17,862 posts)
14. That question always irritated me
Thu Aug 23, 2012, 12:25 PM
Aug 2012

after my second daughter was born. It was like she was of less value because she was a girl and not a boy. I just thank God that he gave me such wonderful daughters. I did not find out before the birth for either girl. One is planning to be an engineer and the other is planning to be a surgeon. Both are smarter than me.

As my girls get older I have found a greater appreciation of what challenges women face. My wife is a traditional stay at home mom (her choice). Neither daughter seems too interested in that life.

Xyzse

(8,217 posts)
10. Hrm... GW Bush only had daughters...
Thu Aug 23, 2012, 12:16 PM
Aug 2012

I mean, he was a cheer leader too.

To think, that for some time they were trying to equate him to Leonidas. They really have no way to keep their logical arguments straight.

prairierose

(2,145 posts)
13. .... and if he was a dairy bull....
Thu Aug 23, 2012, 12:24 PM
Aug 2012

you'd butcher him because bulls that throw only male offspring don't grow the herd. If you are a dairyman or a rancher, you want a bull that throws female offspring.....just sayin...


I guess I should probably add this...

 

nanabugg

(2,198 posts)
15. So what do they call men who have homosexual children? My dad had both. I still think he is a real
Thu Aug 23, 2012, 12:28 PM
Aug 2012

man.

JHB

(37,158 posts)
16. Schadenfreude: William F. Buckley is spinning so fast...
Thu Aug 23, 2012, 12:41 PM
Aug 2012

...the Koch brothers want to dig him up and use him as a drill bit.

He spent his entire adult life trying to make conservatism intellectually respectable, to disassociate the word from the Birchers, backwoods bible thumpers, and the budding Randites. He worked to make it appear to stand on principle, not pure mouth-foam. National Review was his flagship for "thoughtful" conservatism.


And now the loons have eaten his movement! His baby is putting out pure claptrap that even he'd recoil from! (Jonah Goldberg, anyone?)

Buckley was always a pompous, vicious prick, and this would have hit him right where he was most vulnerable: his vanity as an "intellectual".

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»National Review's "R...