 51 replies |
Author | Time | Post |
 Why Isn't Mark Harris Behind Bars for His NC Election Fraud Scheme? (Original post) |
dlk | Feb 2019 | OP |
| alwaysinasnit | Feb 2019 | #1 | |
| Obvious85 | Feb 2019 | #45 | |
| alwaysinasnit | Feb 2019 | #46 | |
| FakeNoose | Feb 2019 | #2 | |
| okaawhatever | Feb 2019 | #40 | |
| LisaM | Feb 2019 | #3 | |
| jmowreader | Feb 2019 | #43 | |
| salin | Feb 2019 | #47 | |
| The Velveteen Ocelot | Feb 2019 | #4 | |
| bullimiami | Feb 2019 | #5 | |
| mahina | Feb 2019 | #49 | |
| bullimiami | Feb 2019 | #50 | |
| brooklynite | Feb 2019 | #6 | |
| CurtEastPoint | Feb 2019 | #7 | |
| dameatball | Feb 2019 | #8 | |
| stuffmatters | Feb 2019 | #24 | |
| malaise | Feb 2019 | #9 | |
| getagrip_already | Feb 2019 | #10 | |
| tinrobot | Feb 2019 | #11 | |
| bluestarone | Feb 2019 | #12 | |
| dlk | Feb 2019 | #13 | |
| Honeycombe8 | Feb 2019 | #14 | |
| NurseJackie | Feb 2019 | #15 | |
| JunkYardDogg | Feb 2019 | #16 | |
| Fritz Walter | Feb 2019 | #17 | |
| R Merm | Feb 2019 | #33 | |
| Ford_Prefect | Feb 2019 | #39 | |
| OMGWTF | Feb 2019 | #18 | |
| diva77 | Feb 2019 | #19 | |
| dhol82 | Feb 2019 | #20 | |
| dugog55 | Feb 2019 | #21 | |
| Botany | Feb 2019 | #22 | |
| peggysue2 | Feb 2019 | #23 | |
| malaise | Feb 2019 | #26 | |
| peggysue2 | Feb 2019 | #29 | |
| okaawhatever | Feb 2019 | #35 | |
| malaise | Feb 2019 | #41 | |
| Baltimike | Feb 2019 | #25 | |
| guillaumeb | Feb 2019 | #27 | |
| shanny | Feb 2019 | #34 | |
| guillaumeb | Feb 2019 | #36 | |
| shanny | Feb 2019 | #37 | |
| guillaumeb | Feb 2019 | #38 | |
| Eliot Rosewater | Feb 2019 | #28 | |
| drray23 | Feb 2019 | #30 | |
| GoCubsGo | Feb 2019 | #31 | |
| shanny | Feb 2019 | #32 | |
| onecaliberal | Feb 2019 | #42 | |
| debsy | Feb 2019 | #44 | |
| Amaryllis | Feb 2019 | #48 | |
| Firestorm49 | Feb 2019 | #51 |
Response to alwaysinasnit (Reply #1)
Fri Feb 22, 2019, 08:11 PM
45. Considering that Texas Woman just got 5 years for voter fraud
Response to Obvious85 (Reply #45)
Fri Feb 22, 2019, 08:15 PM
alwaysinasnit (3,430 posts)
46. You're right. If this guy gets convicted, what do you think the odds are of him serving
Response to dlk (Original post)
Fri Feb 22, 2019, 05:06 PM
FakeNoose (16,695 posts)
2. Good question - why is he still a candidate in the runoff election?
|
At the very least he should be disqualified from ever running in that district.
 |
Response to FakeNoose (Reply #2)
Fri Feb 22, 2019, 07:49 PM
40. The election commission isn't considered a court of law per se, and doesn't have the right to
Response to dlk (Original post)
Fri Feb 22, 2019, 05:07 PM
LisaM (25,960 posts)
3. It goes back to the primaries.
Response to jmowreader (Reply #43)
Fri Feb 22, 2019, 08:15 PM
salin (48,815 posts)
47. If I recall - he used the same ballot fraud scheme perp as a consultant - in the primary in 2016
Response to dlk (Original post)
Fri Feb 22, 2019, 05:07 PM
The Velveteen Ocelot (91,427 posts)
4. I have heard that an investigation has been opened.
Response to dlk (Original post)
Fri Feb 22, 2019, 05:08 PM
bullimiami (10,955 posts)
5. I think referrals have been made to the SA office.
Response to bullimiami (Reply #5)
Sat Feb 23, 2019, 03:57 AM
mahina (12,638 posts)
49. Did you see what his son said when he asked if
Response to mahina (Reply #49)
Sat Feb 23, 2019, 09:16 AM
bullimiami (10,955 posts)
50. Yes. I think this is a big part of what brought the hammer down.
Response to dlk (Original post)
Fri Feb 22, 2019, 05:08 PM
brooklynite (67,869 posts)
6. Because he hasn't been tried yet?
Response to dlk (Original post)
Fri Feb 22, 2019, 05:09 PM
CurtEastPoint (13,153 posts)
7. Because Jeebus and stuff...
Response to dlk (Original post)
Fri Feb 22, 2019, 05:09 PM
dameatball (5,984 posts)
8. Democrats may actually benefit from his remaining on the ballot. Let him lose and then prosecute him
Response to dlk (Original post)
Fri Feb 22, 2019, 05:15 PM
10. better question - why hasn't the guy who tampered with the actual ballots been arrested?
Response to dlk (Original post)
Fri Feb 22, 2019, 05:18 PM
tinrobot (8,764 posts)
11. Because it takes longer than a few days to try and convict someone
Response to dlk (Original post)
Fri Feb 22, 2019, 05:21 PM
bluestarone (11,190 posts)
12. AGREE!!! 100%
Response to dlk (Original post)
Fri Feb 22, 2019, 05:46 PM
dlk (7,646 posts)
13. Harris Should Forfeit Because of His Felonious Cheating
Response to dlk (Original post)
Fri Feb 22, 2019, 06:05 PM
14. Good points. I wonder what's up with that. Any North Carolinians here? nt
Response to dlk (Original post)
Fri Feb 22, 2019, 06:06 PM
NurseJackie (36,729 posts)
15. "Oops. Got caught. My bad. Do over?"
Response to dlk (Original post)
Fri Feb 22, 2019, 06:07 PM
16. 'cuz he's a rightous Christian Pastard
Response to dlk (Original post)
Fri Feb 22, 2019, 06:11 PM
Fritz Walter (3,478 posts)
17. Well, there's one possible answer...
Response to Fritz Walter (Reply #17)
Fri Feb 22, 2019, 07:40 PM
R Merm (345 posts)
33. Elaine Marshall is the SOS, and a Democrat as is the Josh Stain the Attorney General and
Response to Fritz Walter (Reply #17)
Fri Feb 22, 2019, 07:47 PM
Ford_Prefect (3,892 posts)
39. Fritz speaks out of turn. Elaine Marshall, Secretary of state for NC, is a friend to ALL voters.
Response to dlk (Original post)
Fri Feb 22, 2019, 06:39 PM
18. Rethuglicans always rail against voter fraud and not election fraud, at which they're experts.
Response to dlk (Original post)
Fri Feb 22, 2019, 06:58 PM
19. EXACTLY!!! So far the only recourse in these matters has been for citizens to come up with the
|
funding themselves, and nonprofits, and sue the violators, such as elections officials, in court. We have a SERIOUS weakness in our elections infrastructure that protects corrupt politicians and elections officials and does nothing to protect citizens and even allows officials to intimidate citizens who speak out.
  |
Response to dlk (Original post)
Fri Feb 22, 2019, 07:03 PM
dhol82 (8,404 posts)
20. Because he's white?
Response to dlk (Original post)
Fri Feb 22, 2019, 07:11 PM
Botany (58,206 posts)
22. Because he is a pastor.
Response to dlk (Original post)
Fri Feb 22, 2019, 07:20 PM
peggysue2 (7,479 posts)
23. Because he cried during his son's testimony
Response to peggysue2 (Reply #23)
Fri Feb 22, 2019, 07:30 PM
malaise (223,438 posts)
26. What if his wonderful 'pure as the driven snow'
Response to malaise (Reply #26)
Fri Feb 22, 2019, 07:43 PM
35. Doubt it. His son is a lawyer for the DOJ and told his dad not to hire the guy. Said it looked fishy
Response to okaawhatever (Reply #35)
Fri Feb 22, 2019, 07:50 PM
malaise (223,438 posts)
41. Hope you're right
 |
Response to dlk (Original post)
Fri Feb 22, 2019, 07:31 PM
guillaumeb (42,102 posts)
27. Is there evidence that he was a party to the cheating?
Response to shanny (Reply #34)
Fri Feb 22, 2019, 07:43 PM
guillaumeb (42,102 posts)
36. I am not an attorney.
Response to shanny (Reply #37)
Fri Feb 22, 2019, 07:45 PM
guillaumeb (42,102 posts)
38. And at least massive fines, if not a requirement that he sell the team.
Response to dlk (Original post)
Fri Feb 22, 2019, 07:32 PM
Eliot Rosewater (26,828 posts)
28. At least NOT allowed to run again or investigated or indicted. But, as we all know
|
IOKIYAR
But hoping that no longer applies with the new sheriffs in town 
 |
Response to dlk (Original post)
Fri Feb 22, 2019, 07:35 PM
drray23 (5,293 posts)
30. good question. i was wondering the same thing.
Response to dlk (Original post)
Fri Feb 22, 2019, 07:37 PM
GoCubsGo (25,789 posts)
31. Because he has an "R" after his name.
Response to dlk (Original post)
Fri Feb 22, 2019, 07:55 PM
onecaliberal (18,958 posts)
42. Because he's a republicon.
