HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » I was right... It was the...

Sun Feb 10, 2019, 08:49 PM

 

I was right... It was the Bezos mistress and brother...

https://www.thedailybeast.com/mistress-lauren-sanchezs-brother-leaked-bezos-racy-texts-to-enquirer-sources-say-7

42 replies, 6235 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 42 replies Author Time Post
Reply I was right... It was the Bezos mistress and brother... (Original post)
PeeJ52 Feb 2019 OP
Hoyt Feb 2019 #1
Fresh_Start Feb 2019 #3
Pachamama Feb 2019 #2
PeeJ52 Feb 2019 #4
LineLineReply .
Fuzzpope Feb 2019 #9
PeeJ52 Feb 2019 #20
Fuzzpope Feb 2019 #21
DeminPennswoods Feb 2019 #35
Fuzzpope Feb 2019 #5
Post removed Feb 2019 #6
TrogL Feb 2019 #23
TexasBushwhacker Feb 2019 #26
TrogL Feb 2019 #29
malaise Feb 2019 #7
TexasBushwhacker Feb 2019 #14
malaise Feb 2019 #42
2naSalit Feb 2019 #15
WhiteTara Feb 2019 #22
DeminPennswoods Feb 2019 #38
obamanut2012 Feb 2019 #41
TexasBushwhacker Feb 2019 #8
PeeJ52 Feb 2019 #10
Fuzzpope Feb 2019 #11
klook Feb 2019 #30
PeeJ52 Feb 2019 #12
bdamomma Feb 2019 #13
malaise Feb 2019 #16
Cha Feb 2019 #17
PeeJ52 Feb 2019 #18
Cha Feb 2019 #19
Lifelong Protester Feb 2019 #24
More_Cowbell Feb 2019 #25
Leghorn21 Feb 2019 #27
klook Feb 2019 #31
Leghorn21 Feb 2019 #32
RockRaven Feb 2019 #28
DeminPennswoods Feb 2019 #36
watoos Feb 2019 #33
underpants Feb 2019 #34
OnDoutside Feb 2019 #37
Qutzupalotl Feb 2019 #39
PeeJ52 Feb 2019 #40

Response to PeeJ52 (Original post)

Sun Feb 10, 2019, 09:05 PM

1. Gotta be bad for a relationship.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Hoyt (Reply #1)

Sun Feb 10, 2019, 09:09 PM

3. hopefully Bezos will go after both of the individuals

as well as the pecker and company

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to PeeJ52 (Original post)

Sun Feb 10, 2019, 09:09 PM

2. Not so fast to conclusion - brother is actively denying he did this

Unless you have some credible evidence other than an anonymous source quoted, the verdict is still out...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Pachamama (Reply #2)

Sun Feb 10, 2019, 09:11 PM

4. Dang... always something...

 

Oh well...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Pachamama (Reply #2)

Sun Feb 10, 2019, 09:20 PM

9. .

 

"However, Bezos’ investigators have strongly suspected Sanchez was the leaker since at least last week, according to two people familiar with the investigation. “There is no one inside this inquiry process who doesn’t believe he’s ground zero,” one of those sources said.

Abramowitz, the AMI lawyer, appeared to confirm this in his Sunday interview, saying, “Any investigator that was going to investigate this knew who the source was.”"

I think that is pretty cut and dried.

The only thing not made clear is whether or not the sister was involved, and that is THE most important thing to establish here, because if it's found to be true, then what we have here is a Stone-driven, complex network of political hit teams who actually deploy women to ensnare a target sexually, and then ruin him with the evidence of the activities.

And because of what that implies, you can be certain that is the core secret which will be defended to the utmost.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Fuzzpope (Reply #9)

Sun Feb 10, 2019, 10:37 PM

20. You've always got the Gary Hart - Lee Atwater - Roger Stone connection....

 

It's been done before...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to PeeJ52 (Reply #20)

Sun Feb 10, 2019, 10:49 PM

21. Truth

 

Nothing new under the Sun, I just use Stone because he most accurately embodies the current infestation.

And is probably the architect here.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Pachamama (Reply #2)

Mon Feb 11, 2019, 03:26 AM

35. Of course he is because otherwise he's in

big trouble for being a party to alleged blackmail and extortion.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to PeeJ52 (Original post)

Sun Feb 10, 2019, 09:12 PM

5. Hello, Roger Stone..

 

How many feathers in this prick's hat now?

That we even know about?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to PeeJ52 (Original post)


Response to Post removed (Reply #6)

Sun Feb 10, 2019, 11:29 PM

23. My understanding is they've been separated for awhile

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TrogL (Reply #23)

Sun Feb 10, 2019, 11:44 PM

26. Separated from Sanchez?

Good!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TexasBushwhacker (Reply #26)

Sun Feb 10, 2019, 11:55 PM

29. Errr...no. Bezos and his wife

I’m getting confused. There’s way too many people involved.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to PeeJ52 (Original post)

Sun Feb 10, 2019, 09:13 PM

7. I am still wondering if he was set up with the mistress

Hmmmmmm.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to malaise (Reply #7)

Sun Feb 10, 2019, 09:27 PM

14. I think so

Even a 55 year old billionaires can go through mid-life crisis and get itchy. Bezos and Lauren Sanchez traveled in the same social circles and her brother might have given her the idea that it was time to trade up from her Hollywood agent husband.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TexasBushwhacker (Reply #14)

Mon Feb 11, 2019, 04:15 PM

42. Old Chinese proverb in Jamaican patois

"Man with hard dick have soft head".
Let me add that age, wealth and status don't matter.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to malaise (Reply #7)

Sun Feb 10, 2019, 09:30 PM

15. +1

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to malaise (Reply #7)

Sun Feb 10, 2019, 10:56 PM

22. That was my exact thought.

I don't think I'd stay in that relationship even if she didn't.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to malaise (Reply #7)

Mon Feb 11, 2019, 03:40 AM

38. That thought occurred to

me as well.

Or maybe it was a half-baked extortion scheme she and her brother cooked up on their own with AMI as the middle man. Bezos is the richest guy on the planet. Some people are greedy and dumb enough to try ways like this to get some of his dough.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to malaise (Reply #7)

Mon Feb 11, 2019, 12:33 PM

41. same

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to PeeJ52 (Original post)

Sun Feb 10, 2019, 09:17 PM

8. Another article

https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/brother-of-jeff-bezos-girlfriend-lauren-sanchez-slams-moguls-team-in-enquirer-controversy

In addition, Sanchez said his acquaintance with longtime Republican political operative Roger Stone, who recently pleaded not guilty to charges of witness tampering and lying to Congress in Special Counsel Robert Mueller's Russia investigation, is irrelevant to the Bezos matter.

"My friendships are being used as a weapon against me, but the dots don't connect," said Sanchez, who also knows former Trump campaign foreign policy adviser Carter Page and is friends with top AMI executive Dylan Howard."

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TexasBushwhacker (Reply #8)

Sun Feb 10, 2019, 09:21 PM

10. Ewwwww.... You're not going to trick me into going to Foxnews...

 

No way!!!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TexasBushwhacker (Reply #8)

Sun Feb 10, 2019, 09:23 PM

11. I'd contest that it's impossible

 

To rank one's self among that circle of monsters and not be an actively contributing a-hole as well.

"Yeah, I'm tight with all these super villian dickheads, but no no, I'm not one myself. Lol."

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Fuzzpope (Reply #11)

Mon Feb 11, 2019, 12:14 AM

30. Sheesh, no kidding!

I take it Bezos’s super-duper security firm didn’t vet the girlfriend’s family... I guess if you have a lot to lose, it would pay to be paranoid.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to PeeJ52 (Original post)

Sun Feb 10, 2019, 09:24 PM

12. Hmmm... It looks like Fox News is going to get a little "Inside Action" on this too...

 

Maybe a little OJ ratings boost... How convenient to have the Sanchez family available for interviews...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to PeeJ52 (Original post)

Sun Feb 10, 2019, 09:26 PM

13. I hope

Jeff Bezos burns the NI and all its accomplices.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bdamomma (Reply #13)

Sun Feb 10, 2019, 09:34 PM

16. Yes indeed

The usual suspects are everywhere

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to PeeJ52 (Original post)

Sun Feb 10, 2019, 09:35 PM

17. But, what's this last paragraph.. ?! It doesn't make

sense if Michael Sanchez is the one who leaked his sister's private texts to the enquirerer.

From your link..

The identity of the Enquirer’s source was only one of the many mysteries in a tale that is sordid and tangled, even by supermarket tabloid standards. Still unresolved: why Sanchez allegedly supplied the information to the Enquirer; why the Enquirer promoted a story about Bezos with such vigor; what, if anything this had to do with the Enquirer’s long-standing support for Trump; why its parent company was so bothered by the suggestion that it was motivated by “external forces, political or otherwise”; and why AMI tried to later coerce Bezos with a previously-unreleased “d*ck pick.”


And, this makes no sense..
Documents reviewed by The Daily Beast show that Michael Sanchez believed the Enquirer pursued its story about Bezos with “President Trump's knowledge and appreciation”—a chase encouraged, in Sanchez’s estimation, by Republican operatives “who THINK Jeff gets up every morning and has a WaPo meeting to plot its next diabolical attack on President Trump.”

Why would Michael Sanchez send his sister's private texts to the Enquirer if he believed that?!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cha (Reply #17)

Sun Feb 10, 2019, 09:40 PM

18. Because Michael is a big tRump supporter and he thought Bezos was out to get tRump

 

so he wanted to help the Enquirer? It's crazy... plus his sister is a Fox affiliate star and now she's getting interviewed on Fox News... They'll probably have exclusives with her to pump their ratings up. It's gonna be a circus...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to PeeJ52 (Reply #18)

Sun Feb 10, 2019, 09:56 PM

19. The way I read it.. it sounds like

Sanchez is calling out the Enquirerer and trump for going after Bezos.. ".. it was pursuing this story with trump's knowledge and appreciation.." , and mocking "republican operatives".

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to PeeJ52 (Original post)

Sun Feb 10, 2019, 11:35 PM

24. Won't be a long relationship.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to PeeJ52 (Original post)

Sun Feb 10, 2019, 11:41 PM

25. Why are AMI sources believable?

I'm still leaning toward Saudi Arabia.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to More_Cowbell (Reply #25)

Sun Feb 10, 2019, 11:50 PM

27. Yeah, after Rachel showed us this rag, I'm like, whaaa?





I guess we shall see....

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Leghorn21 (Reply #27)

Mon Feb 11, 2019, 12:15 AM

31. Can you buy that on Amazon?


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to klook (Reply #31)

Mon Feb 11, 2019, 12:36 AM

32. Yes, if they weren't currently out of stock!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to PeeJ52 (Original post)

Sun Feb 10, 2019, 11:50 PM

28. The question of who gave the pics to AMI is a distraction from the matter of what AMI did with them

and given that the sources for this article are supposedly people with knowledge of the workings of the National Enquirer/AMI, their motives in giving this info to a reporter are extremely suspect.

This story looks to me like AMI trying to shift attention and blame away from the criminal behavior they engaged with after getting the info, and focus people's attention and ire on the source (either the true one or a patsy).

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to RockRaven (Reply #28)

Mon Feb 11, 2019, 03:33 AM

36. One of the Dailybeast reporters who's an MSNBC

regular guest said another Dailybeast reporter worked at AMI and knows how the company operates. Apparently AMI tried to intimidate him and/or Dailybeast, too. Not sure if he's the author of this story, but he would likely have friendly contacts inside AMI.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to PeeJ52 (Original post)

Mon Feb 11, 2019, 01:16 AM

33. Something smells fishy,

 

So was the lover married? If so I assume she lived with her husband, I assume she didn't live with her brother. How did her brother get possession of her phone unless she was involved?

SDNY needs to investigate these sleeze balls. Also, Pecker was looking for money, did Saudi Arabia give Pecker money? I read where Pecker bought out one of his competitors, where did he get the money?

Finally, why the hell is Saudi Arabia considered our ally?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to watoos (Reply #33)

Mon Feb 11, 2019, 01:42 AM

34. That was my question too. Did he have access to her phone?

Maybe he picked it up and copied or sent the texts to himself. Other than that it seems strange.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to underpants (Reply #34)

Mon Feb 11, 2019, 03:37 AM

37. There surely would have been a record of that on her phone ? In any case, de Becker

had originally said that a Government agency were responsible, so why say that ?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to PeeJ52 (Original post)

Mon Feb 11, 2019, 11:55 AM

39. So ... Sanchez is dirty?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Qutzupalotl (Reply #39)

Mon Feb 11, 2019, 12:25 PM

40. I see what you did there... I'm surprised it lasted 39 responses...

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread