Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kentuck

(111,069 posts)
Wed Jan 4, 2012, 11:54 AM Jan 2012

Was the Iowa caucus as important as the amount of coverage it was given?

For weeks and months, MSNBC and other cable networks have been covering the caucus in Iowa. When it is all over, very little is settled. There is no clear front runner. There may be more questions now than before the caucus took place.

But to listen to the political pundits in the last several weeks, one might think this was an earth-shaking event that was about to change the world. In the end, very few people participated and it is very different from a primary. The voters seemed to change their loyalties every time the wind changed directions. On the day of the caucus, it was blowing in the direction of Rick Santorum. He was probably "Tebowing" back stage? Thank God and Greyhound they're gone.

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Was the Iowa caucus as important as the amount of coverage it was given? (Original Post) kentuck Jan 2012 OP
Yes, but only because of the coverage it was given. comipinko Jan 2012 #1
It was about as important as a bucket of warm piss Autumn Jan 2012 #2
Nope, but it was the only game on yesterday. MineralMan Jan 2012 #3
It seemed to be a game more for the pundits... kentuck Jan 2012 #5
Yes, because: Liberal_Stalwart71 Jan 2012 #4
Citizens United... PoiBoy Jan 2012 #6
Good point. kentuck Jan 2012 #7
The answer is a resounding "No!" Peace Patriot Jan 2012 #8

MineralMan

(146,282 posts)
3. Nope, but it was the only game on yesterday.
Wed Jan 4, 2012, 11:57 AM
Jan 2012

So, the media went all out for it. When there's only one game on, fans watch that game.

 

Liberal_Stalwart71

(20,450 posts)
4. Yes, because:
Wed Jan 4, 2012, 11:58 AM
Jan 2012

a. Even though the Corporate Establishment wants Mittens, they also want high ratings.
b. They would prefer a long, drawn out fight that doesn't touch Mittens--a candidate that has never fully been vetted by the M$M or his rivals in the GOP. I'm still waiting for when Mittens will be taken to task for his flop-flopping and abysmal record when he was governor.

PoiBoy

(1,542 posts)
6. Citizens United...
Wed Jan 4, 2012, 12:09 PM
Jan 2012

..unleashed a boatload of cash into our political system, totally corrupting our due process to a fair and honest vote...

No matter what the personal ideology, the fact remains that the money is in the system, and the Corporate Media Whores, theirs and ours, are going to grab as much of it as they can... IMO..









Peace Patriot

(24,010 posts)
8. The answer is a resounding "No!"
Wed Jan 4, 2012, 12:20 PM
Jan 2012

Much more important is what is happening in the tech basement at ES&S/Diebold, and, beyond that, in Bush Cartel headquarters (wherever that may be), as they decide if the time of forgetting is complete and the time for Bush Junta II is ripe.

Iowa was completely irrelevant to the real decision-makers. The only thing that it was useful for was the impression that it gave that the real decision-makers do not have a designee yet. This may mean that they are still creating and evaluating the narrative that they want to spin around their new 'TRADE SECRET' control of the voting systems throughout the U.S.

Meanwhile, the Corporate Press gets to endlessly spin out rightwing "talking points" to smother all other discussion--"talking points" that are so fascist and so self-serving of the 1% as to be absurd. They trying to artificially make this fascist/corporate agenda the "middle'' of the political spectrum--and bar the REAL discussion that needs to take place, for instance, about dismantling big corporations and seizing their assets for the public good, eliminating money from political campaigns, expanding Social Security and Medicare, public works programs to create jobs and stimulate the economy, strong regulation of banks and jail for the banksters, and so on--and--in my opinion, the most important issue of all--WHO is counting our votes with 'TRADE SECRET' code and virtually no audit/recount controls and how did THAT happen?!

Iowa was "smoke and mirrors." Bullshit.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Was the Iowa caucus as im...