Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
The Heritage Society's Daily Signal had to know
this was coming way in advance. This just dropped into my in-box an hour ago....
Blast from the past.
Why Bill Clinton’s Accuser Doesn’t Believe Ford
Juanita Broaddrick, a woman who accused former President Bill Clinton of rape, called the allegations against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh “sketchy” and “vague.”
“I’m sorry, I do not believe her allegations. If she had something like that done to her, I don’t believe it had anything to do with Brett Kavanaugh,” Broaddrick told The Daily Signal in an exclusive interview Thursday.
“They’re so vague. They’re so sketchy. Everything that Mrs. Ford originally reported [is] crumbling.”
Broaddrick traveled from Arkansas to Washington, D.C., to attend a rally Thursday in support of Kavanaugh. The rally was organized by Concerned Women for America, a conservative public policy women’s organization, and held prior to the public hearings where both Kavanaugh and his accuser, Christine Blasey Ford, were scheduled to testify.
“You cannot go to court or make allegations just on your memory,” Broaddrick said. “You have to have facts, you have to have dates, you have to have what, where, who, how, when, why—which I had at the time, and … Miss Ford doesn’t.”
...
Broaddrick also said there’s a “double standard” for the way Democrats treat accusations of sexual assault, versus Republicans. She said many of the same Democrats who have called for an FBI investigation into Ford’s allegations weren’t even willing to hear her story in the ’90s.
Juanita Broaddrick, a woman who accused former President Bill Clinton of rape, called the allegations against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh “sketchy” and “vague.”
“I’m sorry, I do not believe her allegations. If she had something like that done to her, I don’t believe it had anything to do with Brett Kavanaugh,” Broaddrick told The Daily Signal in an exclusive interview Thursday.
“They’re so vague. They’re so sketchy. Everything that Mrs. Ford originally reported [is] crumbling.”
Broaddrick traveled from Arkansas to Washington, D.C., to attend a rally Thursday in support of Kavanaugh. The rally was organized by Concerned Women for America, a conservative public policy women’s organization, and held prior to the public hearings where both Kavanaugh and his accuser, Christine Blasey Ford, were scheduled to testify.
“You cannot go to court or make allegations just on your memory,” Broaddrick said. “You have to have facts, you have to have dates, you have to have what, where, who, how, when, why—which I had at the time, and … Miss Ford doesn’t.”
...
Broaddrick also said there’s a “double standard” for the way Democrats treat accusations of sexual assault, versus Republicans. She said many of the same Democrats who have called for an FBI investigation into Ford’s allegations weren’t even willing to hear her story in the ’90s.
And then later she claims double standard... yeah right. Accusers of republicans are liars and accusers or democrats are telling the truth.
It’s so important that the American people understand what [Democratic Sens.] Dianne Feinstein [of California], Chuck Schumer [of New York], and Sen. [Dick] Durbin did to me in 1999. I had all the evidence in the world. I had witnesses, I had injuries, I had dates, and everything verified. This was in the ‘NBC Dateline’ interview, and then when I was deposed by the independent counsel, Ken Starr’s group, they deposed me, and this became part of the record of the impeachment, not one Democrat senator would read this. Not one. They completely refused.
If I remember correctly, Ken Starr did research her story.
1. She signed afidavite and under oath that Bill DID NOT rape her, then later recanted.
2. She did not have the month, day or time to substantiate her story
3. She divorced her first husband who was abusing her and was seeing another man before the divorce and the time of the rape. But did not tell him....
4. Her witnesses she claimed she had were friends that had an ax to grind with Bill for commuting the man accused of killing their father.
5 Her Ex denies or did not remember she came home from the trip with a bruised lip (Now if he was the one causing the harm he would have reason to deny this)
6. Ken Starr did not use her information in the case because of the above baggage.
7. Ken Starr went with the Gov. BC exposing himself to PJ instead of the rape allegations?
8. Brett K was part of the Starr investigation and was leaking salacious details to the press.
So I went to YouTube to look for the Dateline piece to see if there was a better version, the one embedded on the daily signal is really poor quality... and look at all the stories about her that have sprung up in the last ten months, and right before the election in 2016.
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=juanita+broaddrick
The daily signal hit piece dropped on youtube 2 hours ago....
