Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

brooklynite

(94,503 posts)
Thu Sep 13, 2018, 09:23 AM Sep 2018

SSTs Could Fly Again as Congress Targets Supersonic Ban

Roll Call:

The U.S. has banned domestic commercial supersonic aviation for four decades, but lawmakers could upend those restrictions in the coming weeks even as environmentalists and public health advocates warn that doing so could elevate pollution and climate damage from high speed aircraft.

Congress faces a Sept. 30 deadline to reauthorize the Federal Aviation Administration. A provision in the House-passed FAA reauthorization bill directs the agency to create federal and international “policies, regulations, and standards relating to the certification and safe and efficient operation of civil supersonic aircraft.”

The Senate bill that was advanced by the Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee last year and now awaits floor consideration would direct the Transportation secretary to promulgate rules to permit “the development, testing, manufacturing, and operation of civil supersonic aircraft in the United States” and to set a noise standard for sonic boom that is “economically reasonable and technologically” practical.The prospect of opening up the U.S. to supersonic flights has provoked reminders and warnings about the fate of the Concorde, which was retired in 2003 because of, according to the FAA, high costs associated with meeting the environmental restrictions on sonic booms, inefficient fuel consumption and other factors.
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
SSTs Could Fly Again as Congress Targets Supersonic Ban (Original Post) brooklynite Sep 2018 OP
Does any airline even have them? None are in service. Historic NY Sep 2018 #1
The only commercial design (Concorde) was based on 60s engine technology... brooklynite Sep 2018 #5
That was the premise back in the 70's when Gov. Rockefeller Historic NY Sep 2018 #7
Not a good idea, polluting the stratosphere. Nitram Sep 2018 #2
Trumps friends want to move faster. Turbineguy Sep 2018 #3
Not sure we have runways for them... Wounded Bear Sep 2018 #4
Runways not main problem unc70 Sep 2018 #6
Stewart AFB had the land... Historic NY Sep 2018 #8
This could become a real issue again, fairly soon DavidDvorkin Sep 2018 #9

brooklynite

(94,503 posts)
5. The only commercial design (Concorde) was based on 60s engine technology...
Thu Sep 13, 2018, 10:12 AM
Sep 2018

They'll have to design a more fuel-efficient form to make the SST return practical

Historic NY

(37,449 posts)
7. That was the premise back in the 70's when Gov. Rockefeller
Thu Sep 13, 2018, 11:43 AM
Sep 2018

took 8000 acres from the taxpayers in New Windsor NY for the MTA to add to the former Stewart Air Force Base, now Stewart International....after decades of court battles the vacant land once dotted with many houses from 1730s 1740s and 18th century were demolished, now remains forever wild Gov. Pataki signed off on the last acreage when he was Gov.

The US SST of which there were 2 would never fly one passenger. In the end the heartache still here in area resonates, because they knew it was too damn expensive to fly in addition to the noise.

People willingly gave the US Government land (2000 acres) back during WWI, but this was beyond. The insult was after the SST fail, they tried to sell it all off for commercial development. Thankfully history and the press covering one fateful meeting by the MTA officials with the public sealed the final nail in that coffin.

Wounded Bear

(58,647 posts)
4. Not sure we have runways for them...
Thu Sep 13, 2018, 10:07 AM
Sep 2018

One reason the original SST would only land in NY is that that was the only airport long enough for it to land. Many airports around the country don't have the extra land around them to extend runways, and that would be expensive.

Perhaps a "new" design SST could land on conventional runways.

The sonic boom problem involves designing a plane that can fly efficiently at lower speeds when at lower altitudes. Not to mention having those high powered engines tamp down noise levels when doing so.

They can pass all the laws they like, the engineering is what the real problem is.

unc70

(6,110 posts)
6. Runways not main problem
Thu Sep 13, 2018, 10:49 AM
Sep 2018

The Concorde made numerous trips to other US airports. I saw it once st RDU. Lots of other reasons it was discontinued.

There is a new generation of SSTs under development which would have radically different characteristics, including much less pollution.

Historic NY

(37,449 posts)
8. Stewart AFB had the land...
Thu Sep 13, 2018, 11:49 AM
Sep 2018

the MTA took it over after the USAF base closed in 1969. See my earlier post.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»SSTs Could Fly Again as C...