Mon Sep 10, 2018, 03:43 PM

sl8 (4,377 posts)

Logical Fallacies, Robot Version

From https://michelerosenthal.com/portfolio/logical-fallacies/

10 replies, 1792 views

Thread info Bookmark this thread Trash this thread

Reply to this thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

10 replies	Author	Time	Post
Logical Fallacies, Robot Version (Original post)	sl8	Sep 2018	OP
I'd give a paycheck if it would ensure people were aware...	LanternWaste	Sep 2018	#1
"either / or" aka "false dichotomy"	Hermit-The-Prog	Sep 2018	#2
Yes, a number of names for that. My favorite is "binary thinking"; another: "all-or-nothing". . . nt	Bernardo de La Paz	Sep 2018	#4
Skynet has already considered and rejected	qazplm135	Sep 2018	#3
Thank you for posting that. A good find! Save and bookmarked and rec'ed. . . . nt	Bernardo de La Paz	Sep 2018	#5
You (DU) may enjoy An Illustrated Book of Bad Arguments	Bernardo de La Paz	Sep 2018	#6
Oh baby, you're talking my language! Want to destroy a RW-tard? Use logical fallacies	ffr	Sep 2018	#7
Someone needs to come up with a Hannity drinking game based on this	Mr. Ected	Sep 2018	#8
Kicked and recommended.	Uncle Joe	Sep 2018	#9
Fox News Instructional Chart?	Fred Sanders	Sep 2018	#10

Response to sl8 (Original post)

Mon Sep 10, 2018, 03:46 PM

LanternWaste (34,147 posts)

1. I'd give a paycheck if it would ensure people were aware...

of even the most basic of fallacies; as even the most clever of people (or so they allege to us) are guilty of these time and time again.

Reply to this post

Response to sl8 (Original post)

Mon Sep 10, 2018, 04:18 PM

Hermit-The-Prog (10,213 posts)

2. "either / or" aka "false dichotomy"

Reply to this post

Response to Hermit-The-Prog (Reply #2)

Mon Sep 10, 2018, 04:45 PM

Bernardo de La Paz (30,106 posts)

4. Yes, a number of names for that. My favorite is "binary thinking"; another: "all-or-nothing". . . nt

Reply to this post

Response to sl8 (Original post)

Mon Sep 10, 2018, 04:24 PM

qazplm135 (3,392 posts)

3. Skynet has already considered and rejected

your fallacies...the Terminators are on their way!

Reply to this post

Response to sl8 (Original post)

Mon Sep 10, 2018, 04:46 PM

Bernardo de La Paz (30,106 posts)

5. Thank you for posting that. A good find! Save and bookmarked and rec'ed. . . . nt

Reply to this post

Response to sl8 (Original post)

Mon Sep 10, 2018, 04:51 PM

Bernardo de La Paz (30,106 posts)

6. You (DU) may enjoy An Illustrated Book of Bad Arguments

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/An_Illustrated_Book_of_Bad_Arguments

https://bookofbadarguments.com/

Reply to this post

Response to sl8 (Original post)

Mon Sep 10, 2018, 05:29 PM

ffr (15,691 posts)

7. Oh baby, you're talking my language! Want to destroy a RW-tard? Use logical fallacies

against them.

Easy to do. 99% of the time their argument is based upon either a Straw Man or a Red Herring. When you point out their false logic, they always always always revert to the last one, an Ad Hominem attack upon you personally. When you point out that they just lost their argument because they cannot defend their original proposition (the Straw Man/Red Herring), but instead have to resort to Ad Hominem, they always get really pissed and walk away or refuse to argue further. SLAMMED!

p.s.

Most RW-tards are a classic example of an Ad Populum fallacy. They believe something, not based on evidence, but to belong to something. They need to belong, even if that system is based on a falsehood. They hate standing alone on any subject, but especially will not stand up against authority when they've been programmed not to stand up to that authority.

Reply to this post

Response to sl8 (Original post)

Mon Sep 10, 2018, 05:42 PM

Mr. Ected (5,546 posts)