Don't Impeach Trump. Annul His Presidency

[egbertowillies]

The only way I see the end of Trump is if there’s overwhelming evidence he rigged the 2016 election. In which case impeachment isn’t an adequate remedy. His presidency should be annulled. Here is why.

https://egbertowillies.com/2018/08/24/dont-impeach-trump-annul-his-presidency/

[Bernardo de La Paz]

1. You don't engage in discussion on DU, so not clicking your clickbait. . . . nt

[Eliot Rosewater]

2. IGNORE anyone not participating on DU

[NCTraveler]

3. That sounds like a winner.

[cloudbase]

4. Please cite any relevant

constitutional provisions or case law that would allow for annulment.

Thanks.

[bearsfootball516]

5. Oh good, this thread again.

[zipplewrath]

7. Probably just a pointer

Basically I suspect it is just going to mention the original article and then roughly repeat everything that's been said.

[MineralMan]

6. I suggest learning about the Constitution.

Really. There is no procedure for annulling an election. Story over.

[DemocratSinceBirth]

9. Silly man, the Pope performs the annulment

[MineralMan]

11. My first marriage was annulled. A judge did it.

Turned out my short-term wife married me to spite a cheating boyfriend. I had no idea, until after the fact. I was young. I learned.

The funniest thing was that she looked me up a couple of decades later, after a couple of divorces. She actually wanted to start something up. I told her, "No, thanks. Once was enough."

No Pope required.

[WillowTree]

8. Yawn..................

[matt819]

10. I have no horse in this race

I don't know the OP and haven't really followed his posts. I know he does videos, but I haven't watched any.

But what's with the animosity?

The annulment idea is not his. Many here have tossed it around for some time, though not necessarily using that word. Yes, yes, I know, it's not in the Constitution. But so much wasn't in the Constitution, until it was, via amendments. And the reference to annulment at this point is not original. Robert Reich used that word a couple of weeks ago. Not exactly a crazy person, Robert Reich. It is likely not going to happen, and maybe it does distract to some degree, but it is not wholly nuts and is worthy of discussion, even if theoretical.

As for the OP's other recent post about civil war - again, this is not his judgment alone. Others have discussed it, and, indeed, the RW is discussing it in their forums, according to references I see here (I won't sully myself by diving into those waters).

[DemocratSinceBirth]

12. Some folks take exception to him using this forum to advance his blog.