Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRep Duncan Hunter (NOT Hines!) can NOT be removed from the ballot & replaced. Too late!
California secretary of State: GOP lawmaker can't be removed from ballot after getting indicted
Rep. Duncan Hunter (R-Calif.) will remain on the ballot in California's 50th Congressional District in November, despite being charged Tuesday with misusing at least $250,000 in campaign funds for personal expenses.
"There exists no process in California Elections Code for Duncan Hunter to remove his name from the November ballot," Sam Mahood, a spokesman for California's Secretary of State, told The Hill in a statement.
Mahood noted that Hunter was one of the top-two vote getters in the district's June primary. He added that there can be no write-in candidates for the November election.
Rep. Duncan Hunter (R-Calif.) will remain on the ballot in California's 50th Congressional District in November, despite being charged Tuesday with misusing at least $250,000 in campaign funds for personal expenses.
"There exists no process in California Elections Code for Duncan Hunter to remove his name from the November ballot," Sam Mahood, a spokesman for California's Secretary of State, told The Hill in a statement.
Mahood noted that Hunter was one of the top-two vote getters in the district's June primary. He added that there can be no write-in candidates for the November election.
http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/402937-california-secretary-of-state-gop-lawmaker-cant-be-removed-from-ballot
Bwahahahahaha! Sometimes things come full circle. The trifecta today! Cohen...Manafort...Duncan. The cherry on top is that Duncan's indictment opens an opportunity in San Diego County, CA.
Today was a very good day.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
15 replies, 2726 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (13)
ReplyReply to this post
15 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Rep Duncan Hunter (NOT Hines!) can NOT be removed from the ballot & replaced. Too late! (Original Post)
Honeycombe8
Aug 2018
OP
LOL LOL! I was reminding myself while typing NOT to put Hines...but I guess that backfired.
Honeycombe8
Aug 2018
#5
That's great... let's hope none of them googles "2002 NJ Senate election" where
hughee99
Aug 2018
#11
Eliot Rosewater
(31,109 posts)1. GOP will vote for him anyway, pretty sure.
Owl
(3,641 posts)14. Yes indeed.
KG
(28,751 posts)2. Senator Cake Mix!
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)5. LOL LOL! I was reminding myself while typing NOT to put Hines...but I guess that backfired.
Representative Betty Crocker is dismayed that Rep Hines was indicted!
madaboutharry
(40,199 posts)3. Duncan Hunter, not Hines.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)6. LOL. I'll correct. I was afraid I'd do that. And look...I did! nt
hatrack
(59,583 posts)10. I was hoping for a 3-way race with Betty Crocker and Mrs. Butterworth!
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)12. LOL! nt
mcar
(42,287 posts)4. Hunter, not Hines
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)7. As I said above, I was whispering to myself while typing...
now don't say Duncan Hines...don't say Duncan Hines.....but I did anyway.
mcar
(42,287 posts)8. Now I want cake!
Hekate
(90,616 posts)9. Mmmmmm
hughee99
(16,113 posts)11. That's great... let's hope none of them googles "2002 NJ Senate election" where
The NJ Democratic party had Bob Toricelli facing similar issues, dropped out on Sept 30th, and despite there being no mechanism to replace him, and he was replaced with Frank Lautenberg.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)13. Bummer. You know if there's a way to do it, the Repubs will do it.
I read up on that Toricelli case. It did take a NJ S.Ct. to allow the substitution. So there's that.
hughee99
(16,113 posts)15. I'm not saying there's a guarantee that this will happen in CA, but it's happened before, so I
wouldn't be sure it couldn't happen again. This was appealed by the republicans to the USSC back in then, but they didn't hear the case.