Friendly forums for passionate Dems!
More than 91 million posts since 2001
Home Latest Greatest Videos Forums Hide ads Join up!
Home Latest Greatest
Videos Forums Help
Hide ads Join up!
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Serious question
Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Serious question (Original Post) malaise Aug 2018 OP
That is a very valid question Sherman A1 Aug 2018 #1
LOL malaise Aug 2018 #2
Ask Ghouliani empedocles Aug 2018 #3
Truth is no longer truth. democratisphere Aug 2018 #4
I guess tax returns don't exist any more than safeinOhio Aug 2018 #5
Then Why Did They Impeach Clinton? ProfessorGAC Aug 2018 #6
Come on Prof malaise Aug 2018 #7
Why the inquiry? dalton99a Aug 2018 #8

Sherman A1

(38,958 posts)
1. That is a very valid question
Reply to malaise (Original post)
Mon Aug 20, 2018, 06:27 AM
Aug 2018

And one th which I have no answer. This latest escapade reminds me of the Star Trek episode in which Kirk told a computer that every thing he told it was a lie and I. A few more lines it blew itself up in the search for logic and facts.

TopBack to the top of the page AlertAlert this post for a rule violation ShareGet links to this post PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
  EditCannot edit other people's posts RecommendRecommend this post ReplyReply to this post

ProfessorGAC

(64,960 posts)
6. Then Why Did They Impeach Clinton?
Reply to malaise (Original post)
Mon Aug 20, 2018, 07:20 AM
Aug 2018

Wasn't that about lying under oath? Well, if there is no truth, he couldn't have lied under oath.

Boy, you raise an inconvenient "truth"! (See what i did there?)

TopBack to the top of the page AlertAlert this post for a rule violation ShareGet links to this post PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
  EditCannot edit other people's posts RecommendRecommend this post ReplyReply to this post
Reply to this discussion
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Serious question
Home | Latest Discussions | Greatest Discussions | Latest Videos | All Forums

About | Copyright | Privacy | Terms of service | Contact

In Memoriam

© 2001 - 2024 Democratic Underground, LLC. Thank you for visiting.