General Discussion

ashredux

(2,599 posts) Tue Jul 17, 2018, 03:05 PM Jul 2018

"Would"......."Would not"

So lame.

19 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

"Would"......."Would not" (Original Post) ashredux Jul 2018 OP

How many people DemKittyNC Jul 2018 #1

ALL of RW radio and Fux Ruse and Breitbart BigmanPigman Jul 2018 #6

Well, I was certainly surprised that the whole shit storm this week would chelsea0011 Jul 2018 #2

Would not doesn't fit in the context of his reply seeing he repeated what Putin said before he spoke uponit7771 Jul 2018 #3

Katy Tur pointing out the context of his tweets, interview w Hannity, etc emulatorloo Jul 2018 #9

+1. It was unmistakable dalton99a Jul 2018 #11

Yeah the White House brain-trust worked really hard to come up with that one. emulatorloo Jul 2018 #4

NBC played back what he said. ginnyinWI Jul 2018 #5

+1 emulatorloo Jul 2018 #10

Beyond lame... in the context of what the Traitor-in-Chief was sayin, he's obviously lying InAbLuEsTaTe Jul 2018 #7

The person who came up with that probably thought it brilliant. Solly Mack Jul 2018 #8

they went to a top p.r. firm headed by a 5-year old kid. unblock Jul 2018 #12

He is desperate. dalton99a Jul 2018 #13

Am I wrong in thinking that his phony "wouldn't" means the same thing as before when he said would? Tracer Jul 2018 #14

CBS online is still discussing. ginnyinWI Jul 2018 #15

per CBS-- ginnyinWI Jul 2018 #17

Hey hi ooky Jul 2018 #16

DON'T MAKE AMERICA NOT GREAT AGAIN fleur-de-lisa Jul 2018 #18

BWAH!!! nolabear Jul 2018 #19

DemKittyNC

(743 posts)

1. How many people

Reply to ashredux (Original post)

Tue Jul 17, 2018, 03:06 PM

Jul 2018

are going to give him a pass just over this alone? Sickening!

BigmanPigman

(51,567 posts)

6. ALL of RW radio and Fux Ruse and Breitbart

Reply to DemKittyNC (Reply #1)

Tue Jul 17, 2018, 03:08 PM

Jul 2018

will spew this shit out.

chelsea0011

(10,115 posts)

2. Well, I was certainly surprised that the whole shit storm this week would

Reply to ashredux (Original post)

Tue Jul 17, 2018, 03:07 PM

Jul 2018

be about using the the word would instead of wouldn't. It is truly mind blowing what a dick this guy is.

uponit7771

(90,301 posts)

3. Would not doesn't fit in the context of his reply seeing he repeated what Putin said before he spoke

Reply to ashredux (Original post)

Tue Jul 17, 2018, 03:08 PM

Jul 2018

emulatorloo

(44,063 posts)

9. Katy Tur pointing out the context of his tweets, interview w Hannity, etc

Reply to uponit7771 (Reply #3)

Tue Jul 17, 2018, 03:11 PM

Jul 2018

Saying it is ludicrous for the president to expect people to believe he “misspoke” that one word.

dalton99a

(81,392 posts)

11. +1. It was unmistakable

Reply to emulatorloo (Reply #9)

Tue Jul 17, 2018, 03:12 PM

Jul 2018

emulatorloo

(44,063 posts)

4. Yeah the White House brain-trust worked really hard to come up with that one.

Reply to ashredux (Original post)

Tue Jul 17, 2018, 03:08 PM

Jul 2018

ginnyinWI

(17,276 posts)

5. NBC played back what he said.

Reply to ashredux (Original post)

Tue Jul 17, 2018, 03:08 PM

Jul 2018

The tone of his voice is totally consistent with "would", not "would not".

And they said he had several chances to clarify and did not take them.

emulatorloo

(44,063 posts)

10. +1

Reply to ginnyinWI (Reply #5)

Tue Jul 17, 2018, 03:11 PM

Jul 2018

InAbLuEsTaTe

(24,121 posts)

7. Beyond lame... in the context of what the Traitor-in-Chief was sayin, he's obviously lying

Reply to ashredux (Original post)

Tue Jul 17, 2018, 03:09 PM

Jul 2018

to cover his Nazi ass... impeach him NOW for treason!!

Solly Mack

(90,758 posts)

8. The person who came up with that probably thought it brilliant.

Reply to ashredux (Original post)

Tue Jul 17, 2018, 03:11 PM

Jul 2018

LMAO

Pathetic.

unblock

(52,116 posts)

12. they went to a top p.r. firm headed by a 5-year old kid.

Reply to ashredux (Original post)

Tue Jul 17, 2018, 03:12 PM

Jul 2018

"just say 'just kidding'! or "i meant to say the exact opposite of what i said! oopsies! i'm so kyooooot!'"

dalton99a

(81,392 posts)

13. He is desperate.

Reply to ashredux (Original post)

Tue Jul 17, 2018, 03:13 PM

Jul 2018

Tracer

(2,769 posts)

14. Am I wrong in thinking that his phony "wouldn't" means the same thing as before when he said would?

Reply to ashredux (Original post)

Tue Jul 17, 2018, 03:17 PM

Jul 2018

As the dope pointed out, it WAS a double negative, and I read it as meaning the absolute same thing as before.

ginnyinWI

(17,276 posts)

15. CBS online is still discussing.

Reply to ashredux (Original post)

Tue Jul 17, 2018, 03:19 PM

Jul 2018

https://www.cbsnews.com/

ginnyinWI

(17,276 posts)

17. per CBS--

Reply to ginnyinWI (Reply #15)

Tue Jul 17, 2018, 03:22 PM

Jul 2018

This isn't good enough. Why if he believed it didn't he confront Putin when he had him standing right there?

ooky

(8,906 posts)

16. Hey hi

Reply to ashredux (Original post)

Tue Jul 17, 2018, 03:21 PM

Jul 2018

another big lie.

fleur-de-lisa

(14,624 posts)

18. DON'T MAKE AMERICA NOT GREAT AGAIN

Reply to ashredux (Original post)

Tue Jul 17, 2018, 03:23 PM

Jul 2018

Link to tweet

nolabear

(41,932 posts)

19. BWAH!!!

Reply to fleur-de-lisa (Reply #18)

Tue Jul 17, 2018, 03:31 PM

Jul 2018

Reply to this discussion