HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Anyone else hear what Vic...

Thu Jul 12, 2018, 09:05 PM

Anyone else hear what Victoria Nulland (who worked in State dept under Kerry) said to Rachel

regarding unusual number of Russians with technical capabilities applying for entry to the US
prior to the election? She mentioned that (paraphrasing) the FBI was concerned about attacks on the voting process.

28 replies, 4189 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 28 replies Author Time Post
Reply Anyone else hear what Victoria Nulland (who worked in State dept under Kerry) said to Rachel (Original post)
triron Jul 2018 OP
elleng Jul 2018 #1
MontanaMama Jul 2018 #2
The Velveteen Ocelot Jul 2018 #3
ancianita Jul 2018 #17
Wellstone ruled Jul 2018 #4
triron Jul 2018 #5
Amaryllis Jul 2018 #6
triron Jul 2018 #8
Amaryllis Jul 2018 #11
triron Jul 2018 #12
ancianita Jul 2018 #19
suprcali Jul 2018 #24
OilemFirchen Jul 2018 #7
Cha Jul 2018 #10
OilemFirchen Jul 2018 #14
Cha Jul 2018 #16
SidDithers Jul 2018 #18
milestogo Jul 2018 #9
bdjhawk Jul 2018 #25
watoos Jul 2018 #13
Baitball Blogger Jul 2018 #15
diva77 Jul 2018 #20
FakeNoose Jul 2018 #23
certainot Jul 2018 #21
elmac Jul 2018 #22
YOHABLO Jul 2018 #26
triron Jul 2018 #27
elmac Jul 2018 #28

Response to triron (Original post)

Thu Jul 12, 2018, 09:09 PM

1. Yes.

Raised concerns.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to triron (Original post)

Thu Jul 12, 2018, 09:10 PM

2. Yup.

She was very measured and very clear. Gawd I miss adults working for the good of our nation.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to triron (Original post)

Thu Jul 12, 2018, 09:11 PM

3. Yes. She also said she didn't know the FBI was investigating the Trump campaign -

showing again how closely they were guarding that information.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to The Velveteen Ocelot (Reply #3)

Thu Jul 12, 2018, 10:42 PM

17. It's her support against the GOP's eventual attempt to discredit the Mueller report and indictments.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to triron (Original post)

Thu Jul 12, 2018, 09:12 PM

4. Yes and this is new news.

Nothing before tonight has ever been reported. And Nulland was aware of Mr. Steele since 2014 with Russian info.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Wellstone ruled (Reply #4)

Thu Jul 12, 2018, 09:31 PM

5. Now we know the FBI was concerned about election tampering in terms of altering votes.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to triron (Original post)

Thu Jul 12, 2018, 09:33 PM

6. THat was reported summer 2016 along with them hacking voter reg databases.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Amaryllis (Reply #6)

Thu Jul 12, 2018, 09:49 PM

8. By the State Dept.?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to triron (Reply #8)

Thu Jul 12, 2018, 09:58 PM

11. THe media. Along with the reports of Russian hacking into voter reg databases. I was pretty

sure summer of 2016 that they were going to steal it just based on what media was reporting about Russian hacking and the influx of Russians entering the country. People didn't seem to be connecting the dots.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Amaryllis (Reply #11)

Thu Jul 12, 2018, 10:01 PM

12. I believe you! The media was too wrapped up in HRC's emails. ):

Talk about screwed up responsiveness.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to triron (Reply #12)

Thu Jul 12, 2018, 10:43 PM

19. Only FOX News. We know it's not "the media."

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ancianita (Reply #19)

Thu Jul 12, 2018, 11:47 PM

24. more fox

It was also others like NYT.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to triron (Original post)

Thu Jul 12, 2018, 09:43 PM

7. Yeah, but we can't trust her.

Remember that she rewarded Ukrainian assassins with cookies, and that's why Putin had to invade. (Which he really didn't do anyway.)

It's true. I read it all over the Dee Yoo at the time.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to OilemFirchen (Reply #7)

Thu Jul 12, 2018, 09:57 PM

10. I know.. were those

Russian bots? Whatever they were they definitely defended putin.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cha (Reply #10)

Thu Jul 12, 2018, 10:33 PM

14. Some clearly were.

Most left us for the pines.

Some remain.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to OilemFirchen (Reply #14)

Thu Jul 12, 2018, 10:39 PM

16. Yep, easy to spot. I remember those days

as "Putin Good-Obama Bad" Freaking idiots.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to OilemFirchen (Reply #7)

Thu Jul 12, 2018, 10:42 PM

18. Nailed it...

I remember it well.

Fucking clowns.

Sid

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to triron (Original post)

Thu Jul 12, 2018, 09:53 PM

9. Rachel has mentioned that on her show.

They were concerned, yet the visas were granted.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to milestogo (Reply #9)

Fri Jul 13, 2018, 12:02 AM

25. They were concerned,

yet Comey focused the country on HRC's emails (all the while letting the Manchurian Candidate off the hook!!!)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to triron (Original post)

Thu Jul 12, 2018, 10:18 PM

13. I have said this here at least a half dozen times,

when our intelligence said it had no evidence that any of our votes were flipped, they were telling the truth. The problem is, voting is left to the states to administer, how can there be any proof of voter machine rigging when no voter machines are independently audited? The machines are owned by Republicans who claim proprietary rights for not allowing them to be audited.

Until we go to paper ballots I will consider none of our elections fair and honest. Why is it that exit polling used to be a reliable indicator of who won but since the advent of electronic voting machines exit polling is no longer reliable? You figure it out.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to watoos (Reply #13)

Thu Jul 12, 2018, 10:38 PM

15. I am so glad that Republicans invested so much money on building prisons,

because we're going to need them to contain all the Repubs that were involved in the conspiracy.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to watoos (Reply #13)

Thu Jul 12, 2018, 10:59 PM

20. +1,000,000 Keep saying it. Cannot be said often enough ---also pls. include that the paper ballots

need to be hand-counted at the precinct level with public oversight!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to diva77 (Reply #20)

Thu Jul 12, 2018, 11:39 PM

23. Yes paper ballots should be required in every state

Until we get to the bottom of this we need to secure the integrity of our elections.
Paper ballots, counted and reported locally. Keep everything offline.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to triron (Original post)

Thu Jul 12, 2018, 11:28 PM

21. to do all this without figuring out how to feed rw radio makes no sense

how long has the kremlin been feeding limbaugh? that would be so much easier and control output from 1500 radio stations....

the r-con limbaugh russian goals coincide very closely

lately limbaugh's been taking a lot of day off - hopefully they found some cyprus bank accts with his name on them and he's been asked in to answer questions.....

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to triron (Original post)

Thu Jul 12, 2018, 11:32 PM

22. also mention by ms Nulland was that Putin was near broke

the last time I heard he was worth billions. I wonder what happened?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to elmac (Reply #22)

Fri Jul 13, 2018, 12:02 AM

26. Yes, I read not long ago that Putin was worth billions and had money interest all over the place.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to elmac (Reply #22)

Fri Jul 13, 2018, 12:04 AM

27. I don't think she was referring to his personal wealth.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to triron (Reply #27)

Fri Jul 13, 2018, 09:38 AM

28. she referred to his wealth and Russia's wealth separately

so I'm thinking she may have misspoken, Russia's economy is still in the shitter but I don't believe for one minute that Putin isn't uber rich. I wish Rachel would have caught that and had her expand on that comment.

Vladimir Putin Net Worth 2017: Russia's Leader May Be One Of The Richest Men In The World

http://www.ibtimes.com/vladimir-putin-net-worth-2017-russias-leader-may-be-one-richest-men-world-2492300

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread