HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » can someone please explai...

Thu Jul 12, 2018, 11:18 AM

can someone please explain the point of order dispute in the strzok hearing?

it's awesome seeing 20 threads about how awesome this awesome thing is, but some of us aren't seeing it live and have no idea what's so awesome.

8 replies, 668 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 8 replies Author Time Post
Reply can someone please explain the point of order dispute in the strzok hearing? (Original post)
unblock Thursday OP
MattP Thursday #1
unblock Thursday #4
DemocratSinceBirth Thursday #2
LuckyCharms Thursday #3
unblock Thursday #5
LuckyCharms Thursday #7
unblock Thursday #8
asiliveandbreathe Thursday #6

Response to unblock (Original post)

Thu Jul 12, 2018, 11:19 AM

1. 5 minutes sure is a long tine

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MattP (Reply #1)

Thu Jul 12, 2018, 11:20 AM

4. thanks for the clarification

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to unblock (Original post)

Thu Jul 12, 2018, 11:20 AM

2. This is like professional wrestling.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to unblock (Original post)

Thu Jul 12, 2018, 11:20 AM

3. Repubs bullying strzok into answering questions about the

investigation. Democrats calling bullshit.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LuckyCharms (Reply #3)

Thu Jul 12, 2018, 11:21 AM

5. i got that part. i mean, specifically, what's the point of order, what's the making up rules part?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to unblock (Reply #5)

Thu Jul 12, 2018, 11:25 AM

7. A precedent was cited by the Democrats

which indicated that questions that would hamper an investigation should not be allowed and that Mr. Strozk was not obligated to answer the questions. That was the point of order I believe.

But don't ask me...I don't know exactly what a point of order is.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LuckyCharms (Reply #7)

Thu Jul 12, 2018, 11:26 AM

8. thanks -- finally a bit of actual information

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to unblock (Original post)

Thu Jul 12, 2018, 11:24 AM

6. Banging back....goodlatte and gowdy are an embarrassment to the

American people....Strzok..firing back..audience clapping..awesome.....subpoena Bannon?? - YES!!!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread