General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNot one. When the Russia case goes before the Supreme Court Trump will have picked TWO of the judges
2 of the 9 judges deciding his case(s).
these judges must recuse themselves from these cases.
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)TeamPooka
(24,156 posts)berni_mccoy
(23,018 posts)The only real issue might be Roberts presiding over the Impeachment in the Senate... and I don't think Roberts has too much loyalty to Trump, though I was surprised by Kennedy revelations... you never know.
BigmanPigman
(51,432 posts)Kennedy was considered a swing judge but since his announcement info has come out that he is corrupt and involved with the moron and Ivanka. He is not objective and his new judge won't be either. All of the Kool-aid drinkers are filling all three branches. We are going to have to fight like mad over the next few months as this is hitting the fan.
asiliveandbreathe
(8,203 posts)package to be all prettied up with Canada and Great Britain and France and Germany contributing to the line items...truth always wins..
I do believe the FBI, and the Intelligence communities and Special Prosecutor Mueller and his team will NOT allow the truth to go unnoticed by the public....I do not believe it will get to SCOTUS...this thing is going to blow t rump and pootie into a head on collision over the pond..may all the missing parts be lost forever...
TeamPooka
(24,156 posts)I do not think they will do anything but protect Trump.
onenote
(42,383 posts)In US v. Nixon, the Nixon appointees to the Court didn't recuse themselves.
In Clinton v. Jones, the Clinton appointees to the Court didn't recuse themselves.