Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NYT's Nate Cohn: 'Unlikely' that California Democrats will be shut out of November elections (Original Post) RandySF May 2018 OP
Damn that sounds Cha May 2018 #1
Did I miss something? Seems I did. What are you folks talking about? mahina May 2018 #2
I think it's top 2 in a wide field MissB May 2018 #3
yes, if the democratic votes are spread out among many candidates JI7 May 2018 #4
OH! Thank you. mahina May 2018 #5
This confuses me too. BigmanPigman May 2018 #6
There is no PARTISAN primary Jim Lane May 2018 #7

mahina

(17,637 posts)
2. Did I miss something? Seems I did. What are you folks talking about?
Sat May 26, 2018, 12:44 AM
May 2018

How can California be locked out of the next election?

Mahalo for explaining.

Districts 39, 48 and 49 aren't letting Democrats register?

?

I sent Doug Applegate money to beat Issa but I think, don't really remember, he's in district 50.

I hope Issa and Nunes are turfed out in a landslide. I can dream!

MissB

(15,805 posts)
3. I think it's top 2 in a wide field
Sat May 26, 2018, 12:59 AM
May 2018

But I don’t really know for sure. I’ve caught snippets along the way.

On edit: meaning the top two candidates could be republicans.

JI7

(89,244 posts)
4. yes, if the democratic votes are spread out among many candidates
Sat May 26, 2018, 01:15 AM
May 2018

and most republican votes go to 2 republicans it could result in those 2 republicans ending up on the final ballot.

even if the total votes for all the democrats were far higher than the totals for the republicans.


mahina

(17,637 posts)
5. OH! Thank you.
Sat May 26, 2018, 02:32 AM
May 2018

I think we were batting that one around here too.

Interesting.

I wonder how that would go differently... guessing that if there's no primary, there's no chance for the Dems in those districts, or the Republicans in solid blue districts.

Party aside, I wonder what really honors the will of the voters best.

BigmanPigman

(51,582 posts)
6. This confuses me too.
Sat May 26, 2018, 03:32 AM
May 2018

District 50 is Issa and 49 is Hunter. I think 49 is the one we have to really worry about. From what I have seen on the local news that area is pretty dug into the whole GOP load of BS.

 

Jim Lane

(11,175 posts)
7. There is no PARTISAN primary
Sat May 26, 2018, 02:51 PM
May 2018

Every candidate -- Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Green, independent -- goes on the same ballot for one big primary (sometimes nicknamed a "jungle" primary, as a war of each against all). The top two finishers, regardless of party, appear on the general election ballot.

The lockout did happen in a race in Washington state. Three Democrats and two Republicans were all fairly close in the voting. That meant that the Democrats collectively beat the Republicans collectively by about 3 to 2. The way the votes happened to fall out, though, was that the two Republicans were at the top of the tightly bunched field. Thus, in November, the voters had a choice between two Republicans.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»NYT's Nate Cohn: 'Unlikel...