Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
Thu Aug 2, 2012, 12:28 PM Aug 2012

Report: Obama OKs support for Syrian rebels

Report: Obama OKs support for Syrian rebels

By David Jackson

President Obama approved an additional $12 million in humanitarian assistance to Syria today, amid reports that he has also authorized covert aide to rebels who are seeking to topple the regime of Bashar al-Assad.

In announcing the new aid, White House spokesman Jay Carney said: "The quickest way to end the bloodshed and suffering of the Syrian people is for Bashar al-Assad to recognize that the Syrian people will not allow him to continue in power, and to step aside to enable a peaceful political transition to a government that is responsive to the aspirations of the Syrian people."

Meanwhile, White House officials have refused to comment on reports that Obama has also signed an order authorizing U.S. support for rebels in their battle against Assad's government.

Details of the order signed earlier this year are unclear, writes Mark Hosenball of Reuters, but the finding "broadly permits the CIA and other U.S. agencies to provide support that could help the rebels oust Assad."

- more -

http://content.usatoday.com/communities/theoval/post/2012/08/reports-obama-oks-support-for-syrian-rebels/1

Makes you wonder why an action involving the CIA and intelligence support from earlier this year is suddenly in the news? Why is it timed with the humanitarian aid? The RW-neocons are calling it a national security leak: http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/312985/another-leak-reveals-obamas-inaction-syria-elliott-abrams

Is Mitt in trouble?

32 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Report: Obama OKs support for Syrian rebels (Original Post) ProSense Aug 2012 OP
Will he hire Ollie North to run the operation? Tierra_y_Libertad Aug 2012 #1
Are you implying that the President is doing something illegal? n/t ProSense Aug 2012 #2
I don't know about the "legality" but I do know how our interference in civil wars have worked out. Tierra_y_Libertad Aug 2012 #5
And ProSense Aug 2012 #16
Exactly. And, Iraq and Afghanistan. Tierra_y_Libertad Aug 2012 #18
Wait ProSense Aug 2012 #22
You're right. The civil war in Iraq started after we "helped" them. Tierra_y_Libertad Aug 2012 #23
You know, it's going to come out that casualties went up after Obama signed off on this, don't you? leveymg Aug 2012 #3
Actually, ProSense Aug 2012 #4
Yeah,their CIA trainers have been busy. Comrade Grumpy Aug 2012 #6
That just means Sunni militia now kill more Shi'ia and gov't soldiers, and vis-a-versa, in Syria leveymg Aug 2012 #7
So ProSense Aug 2012 #9
Never okay with any of the slaughter. More opposed as it's getting worse with US intervention leveymg Aug 2012 #12
Well, ProSense Aug 2012 #15
Nobel Peace Prize - what a fucking joke. woo me with science Aug 2012 #8
Broken record? n/t ProSense Aug 2012 #10
He won the Nobel for his work on securing loose nukes. AtomicKitten Aug 2012 #17
For someone who wants to be "wooed by science", your predictable talking points betray you. Tarheel_Dem Aug 2012 #30
ROFL! woo me with science Aug 2012 #31
Pretty much, but the thesis for your worn out talking point re: "Nobel Peace Prize" is..... Tarheel_Dem Aug 2012 #32
One problem is that this conflict is empowering Sunni terrorist groups killbotfactory Aug 2012 #11
recced for visibility. Please see comments in thread. leveymg Aug 2012 #13
We shouldn't be supporting either side.. SIIHPAPP87 Aug 2012 #14
"Here we go supporting the takeover of yet another country by the Muslim Brotherhood. " ProSense Aug 2012 #19
...my thoughts exactly. Lucy Goosey Aug 2012 #20
Bachmann? SIIHPAPP87 Aug 2012 #21
Yeah, ProSense Aug 2012 #24
Long morning at the office.. SIIHPAPP87 Aug 2012 #25
omg. you're spinning obama's covert aid to syria on romney? HiPointDem Aug 2012 #26
"omg." What? ProSense Aug 2012 #27
the all-powerful romney!! our president is powerless against his might!! HiPointDem Aug 2012 #28
"the all-powerful romney!! " ProSense Aug 2012 #29
 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
5. I don't know about the "legality" but I do know how our interference in civil wars have worked out.
Thu Aug 2, 2012, 12:55 PM
Aug 2012

Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, Congo, Nicaragua, Chile, Honduras, El Salvador, Iran, Greece, Angola, Mozambique, and countless others we've "helped".

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
18. Exactly. And, Iraq and Afghanistan.
Thu Aug 2, 2012, 01:18 PM
Aug 2012

All, of course, justified to "protect our vital national interests" from whatever bogeyman "threatens" them.

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
22. Wait
Thu Aug 2, 2012, 01:34 PM
Aug 2012

"Exactly. And, Iraq and Afghanistan."

...there was no civil war or uprising in Iraq when Bush invaded, and Obama ended the war.

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
23. You're right. The civil war in Iraq started after we "helped" them.
Thu Aug 2, 2012, 01:37 PM
Aug 2012

And, we still have troops...er.."advisers" in Iraq and a whole lot of "helpers" in Afghanistan.

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
3. You know, it's going to come out that casualties went up after Obama signed off on this, don't you?
Thu Aug 2, 2012, 12:47 PM
Aug 2012

The US has also violated the UN weapons embargo, at least by complicity with KSA, GCC and others whose actions we have been coordinating and facilitating in this covert intervention.

Is the Obama Administration prepared to answer charges of complicity in war crimes committed by the FSA and other forces receiving our help? We need to be asking this question before we get even more deeply into this religious war and sectarian slaughterhouse.

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
4. Actually,
Thu Aug 2, 2012, 12:53 PM
Aug 2012

"You know, it's going to come out that casualties went up after Obama signed off on this, don't you?"

...from the Reuters report:

But U.S. and European officials have said that there have been noticeable improvements in the coherence and effectiveness of Syrian rebel groups in the past few weeks. That represents a significant change in assessments of the rebels by Western officials, who previously characterized Assad's opponents as a disorganized, almost chaotic, rabble.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/08/02/us-usa-syria-obama-order-idUSBRE8701OK20120802



leveymg

(36,418 posts)
7. That just means Sunni militia now kill more Shi'ia and gov't soldiers, and vis-a-versa, in Syria
Thu Aug 2, 2012, 12:59 PM
Aug 2012

That just seems to add to the body-count on both sides, that will continue to rise, along with the attendant massacres and ethnic cleansing of the affected civilian populations. We are now part of those war crimes. How is Obama going to respond to that?

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
9. So
Thu Aug 2, 2012, 01:01 PM
Aug 2012
That just means that they are now killing more Shi'ia and gov't soldiers, and vis-a-versa, in Syria

That just seems to add to the body-count on both sides, that will continue to rise, along with the attendant massacres and ethnic cleansing of the affected civilian populations. We are now part of those war crimes. How is Obama going to respond to that?

...you were OK when the slaughter was one-sided?

Intelligence doesn't kill, it's a strategic aid.

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
12. Never okay with any of the slaughter. More opposed as it's getting worse with US intervention
Thu Aug 2, 2012, 01:05 PM
Aug 2012

Intelligence, logistics, communications, propaganda are all part of aggressive war, genocide, and ethnic cleansing. You need to read some of the case law from international human rights tribunals, e.g., Serbia and Rwanda, and you wouldn't make such ignorant claims.

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
15. Well,
Thu Aug 2, 2012, 01:10 PM
Aug 2012

"Never okay with any of the slaughter. More opposed as it's getting worse with US intervention"

...they could be asked to stop fighting, and no doubt diplomacy is underway, but the reality is they are fighting.

Intelligence, logistics, communications, propaganda are all part of aggressive war, genocide, and ethnic cleansing. You need to read some of the case law from international human rights tribunals, e.g., Serbia and Rwanda, and you wouldn't make ignorant claims.

Well, migthy condescending coming from someone spinning a non-existing situation.

In fact, I do recall the hands-off approach to Rwanda, that led to Clinton being called a "war criminal."

 

AtomicKitten

(46,585 posts)
17. He won the Nobel for his work on securing loose nukes.
Thu Aug 2, 2012, 01:15 PM
Aug 2012

But you knew that already, didn't you?

It just doesn't fit your 'they're exactly the same' narrative.

Tarheel_Dem

(31,233 posts)
30. For someone who wants to be "wooed by science", your predictable talking points betray you.
Thu Aug 2, 2012, 03:40 PM
Aug 2012

Thorbjørn Jagland: Chairman, Norwegian Nobel Committee
Former Norwegian Labor Party prime minister and Secretary General of the Council of Europe

"Jagland said "We have not given the prize for what may happen in the future. We are awarding Obama for what he has done in the past year."


There's that talking point out the window. As has been stated above, this award was for his work in the area of "nuclear proliferation". Sorry.

Tarheel_Dem

(31,233 posts)
32. Pretty much, but the thesis for your worn out talking point re: "Nobel Peace Prize" is.....
Thu Aug 2, 2012, 04:18 PM
Aug 2012

shot all to hell.


killbotfactory

(13,566 posts)
11. One problem is that this conflict is empowering Sunni terrorist groups
Thu Aug 2, 2012, 01:04 PM
Aug 2012

Both in Syria and Iraq. The longer this conflict goes on, the more influential these groups will become if the rebels are successful. It would make sense for western governments to try and hasten Assad's exit now that it seems inevitable, sooner or later.

 

SIIHPAPP87

(5 posts)
14. We shouldn't be supporting either side..
Thu Aug 2, 2012, 01:09 PM
Aug 2012

We shouldn't be supporting either side in Syria. No humanitarian assistance or military aid to the rebels. Both sides are pure evil and their end game leads to the same agenda.

On one side you have a government slaughtering it's people. On the other you have a rebellion force (Free Syrian Army) acting like savages with ties to Al Qaeda.

Here we go supporting the takeover of yet another country by the Muslim Brotherhood.

 

SIIHPAPP87

(5 posts)
21. Bachmann?
Thu Aug 2, 2012, 01:32 PM
Aug 2012

The truth hurts sometimes. The old saying goes like "Sleeping with the enemy"

If you look around there is undeniable evidence that the FSA is committing just as heinous if not worse war crimes than Assad.

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
24. Yeah,
Thu Aug 2, 2012, 01:38 PM
Aug 2012

"The truth hurts sometimes."

...Bachmann believes the shit she says too.


"If you look around there is undeniable evidence that the FSA is committing just as heinous if not worse war crimes then Assad. "

"Then Assad"?




ProSense

(116,464 posts)
27. "omg." What?
Thu Aug 2, 2012, 01:50 PM
Aug 2012

Let me apologize: I'm sorry your perception that Romney might be implicated here has caused you great concern.





Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Report: Obama OKs support...