HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » 14 Symptoms Shared by Fas...

Mon Apr 30, 2018, 05:00 PM

14 Symptoms Shared by Fascist Regimes. Are We There Yet?

Last edited Mon Apr 30, 2018, 06:46 PM - Edit history (4)

Very sobering, informative article. With permission, this portion of the Dailykos article is presented:


"We have to ask ourselves: How do we regain true representation locally, state-wide, and federally. Well, we are asking ourselves, hence Occupy movements all over the country.

BUT I WANT YOU TO KNOW JUST HOW SERIOUS OF A MESS WE ARE IN. The police activity we are seeing is the tip of a proto-fascist iceberg! You know this is true, so let's get this out in the open and push back vigorously.

Let this ignite the spirit needed to unite us.

Analysis of seven fascist or protofascist regimes reveals fourteen common threads that link them in recognizable patterns of national behavior and abuse of power. These basic characteristics are more prevalent and intense in some regimes than in others, but they all share at least some level of similarity.

1. Powerful and continuing expressions of nationalism. From the prominent displays of flags and bunting to the ubiquitous lapel pins, the fervor to show patriotic nationalism, both on the part of the regime itself and of citizens caught up in its frenzy, was always obvious. Catchy slogans, pride in the military, and demands for unity were common themes in expressing this nationalism. It was usually coupled with a suspicion of things foreign that often bordered on xenophobia.

2. Disdain for the importance of human rights. The regimes themselves viewed human rights as of little value and a hindrance to realizing the objectives of the ruling elite. Through clever use of propaganda, the population was brought to accept these human rights abuses by marginalizing, even demonizing, those being targeted. When abuse was egregious, the tactic was to use secrecy, denial, and disinformation.

3. Identification of enemies/scapegoats as a unifying cause. The most significant common thread among these regimes was the use of scapegoating as a means to divert the people’s attention from other problems, to shift blame for failures, and to channel frustration in controlled directions. The methods of choice—relentless propaganda and disinformation—were usually effective. Often the regimes would incite “spontaneous” acts against the target scapegoats, usually communists, socialists, liberals, Jews, ethnic and racial minorities, traditional national enemies, members of other religions, secularists, homosexuals, and “terrorists.” Active opponents of these regimes were inevitably labeled as terrorists and dealt with accordingly.

4. The supremacy of the military/avid militarism. Ruling elites always identified closely with the military and the industrial infrastructure that supported it. A disproportionate share of national resources was allocated to the military, even when domestic needs were acute. The military was seen as an expression of nationalism, and was used whenever possible to assert national goals, intimidate other nations, and increase the power and prestige of the ruling elite.

5. Rampant sexism. Beyond the simple fact that the political elite and the national culture were male-dominated, these regimes inevitably viewed women as second-class citizens. They were adamantly anti-abortion and also homophobic. These attitudes were usually codified in Draconian laws that enjoyed strong support by the orthodox religion of the country, thus lending the regime cover for its abuses.

6. A controlled mass media. Under some of the regimes, the mass media were under strict direct control and could be relied upon never to stray from the party line. Other regimes exercised more subtle power to ensure media orthodoxy. Methods included the control of licensing and access to resources, economic pressure, appeals to patriotism, and implied threats. The leaders of the mass media were often politically compatible with the power elite. The result was usually success in keeping the general public unaware of the regimes’ excesses.

7. Obsession with national security. Inevitably, a national security apparatus was under direct control of the ruling elite. It was usually an instrument of oppression, operating in secret and beyond any constraints. Its actions were justified under the rubric of protecting “national security,” and questioning its activities was portrayed as unpatriotic or even treasonous.

8. Religion and ruling elite tied together. Unlike communist regimes, the fascist and protofascist regimes were never proclaimed as godless by their opponents. In fact, most of the regimes attached themselves to the predominant religion of the country and chose to portray themselves as militant defenders of that religion. The fact that the ruling elite’s behavior was incompatible with the precepts of the religion was generally swept under the rug. Propaganda kept up the illusion that the ruling elites were defenders of the faith and opponents of the “godless.” A perception was manufactured that opposing the power elite was tantamount to an attack on religion.

9. Power of corporations protected. Although the personal life of ordinary citizens was under strict control, the ability of large corporations to operate in relative freedom was not compromised. The ruling elite saw the corporate structure as a way to not only ensure military production (in developed states), but also as an additional means of social control. Members of the economic elite were often pampered by the political elite to ensure a continued mutuality of interests, especially in the repression of “have-not” citizens.

10. Power of labor suppressed or eliminated. Since organized labor was seen as the one power center that could challenge the political hegemony of the ruling elite and its corporate allies, it was inevitably crushed or made powerless. The poor formed an underclass, viewed with suspicion or outright contempt. Under some regimes, being poor was considered akin to a vice.

11. Disdain and suppression of intellectuals and the arts. Intellectuals and the inherent freedom of ideas and expression associated with them were anathema to these regimes. Intellectual and academic freedom were considered subversive to national security and the patriotic ideal. Universities were tightly controlled; politically unreliable faculty harassed or eliminated. Unorthodox ideas or expressions of dissent were strongly attacked, silenced, or crushed. To these regimes, art and literature should serve the national interest or they had no right to exist.

12. Obsession with crime and punishment. Most of these regimes maintained Draconian systems of criminal justice with huge prison populations. The police were often glorified and had almost unchecked power, leading to rampant abuse. “Normal” and political crime were often merged into trumped-up criminal charges and sometimes used against political opponents of the regime. Fear, and hatred, of criminals or “traitors” was often promoted among the population as an excuse for more police power.

13. Rampant cronyism and corruption. Those in business circles and close to the power elite often used their position to enrich themselves. This corruption worked both ways; the power elite would receive financial gifts and property from the economic elite, who in turn would gain the benefit of government favoritism. Members of the power elite were in a position to obtain vast wealth from other sources as well: for example, by stealing national resources. With the national security apparatus under control and the media muzzled, this corruption was largely unconstrained and not well understood by the general population.

14. Fraudulent elections. Elections in the form of plebiscites or public opinion polls were usually bogus. When actual elections with candidates were held, they would usually be perverted by the power elite to get the desired result. Common methods included maintaining control of the election machinery, intimidating and disenfranchising opposition voters, destroying or disallowing legal votes, and, as a last resort, turning to a judiciary beholden to the power elite.

Analysis of seven fascist or protofascist regimes reveals fourteen common threads that link them in recognizable patterns of national behavior and abuse of power. These basic characteristics are more prevalent and intense in some regimes than in others, but they all share at least some level of similarity. Source: Laurence Britt https://ratical.org/ratville/CAH/fasci14chars.html

Does any of this ring alarm bells?

We don't have much time left (no pun)."

https://www.dailykosbeta.com/stories/2011/10/28/1031026/-14-Common-Threads-of-Seven-Fascist-Regimes-Is-USA-Becoming-Fascist

The above was compiled in 2011.

15 replies, 1086 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 15 replies Author Time Post
Reply 14 Symptoms Shared by Fascist Regimes. Are We There Yet? (Original post)
OhNo-Really Apr 2018 OP
democrank Apr 2018 #1
OhNo-Really Apr 2018 #2
SharonClark Apr 2018 #3
OhNo-Really Apr 2018 #4
RandomAccess Apr 2018 #5
OhNo-Really Apr 2018 #6
RandomAccess Apr 2018 #7
OhNo-Really Apr 2018 #10
Takket Apr 2018 #8
peggysue2 Apr 2018 #9
OhNo-Really Apr 2018 #11
brooklynite Apr 2018 #12
OhNo-Really May 2018 #13
brooklynite May 2018 #15
Pathwalker May 2018 #14

Response to OhNo-Really (Original post)

Mon Apr 30, 2018, 05:32 PM

1. Kick

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to democrank (Reply #1)

Mon Apr 30, 2018, 05:37 PM

2. Thanks. We would do well to keep this info front and center, imho

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to OhNo-Really (Original post)

Mon Apr 30, 2018, 06:13 PM

3. We may not be there but Trump is

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SharonClark (Reply #3)

Mon Apr 30, 2018, 06:25 PM

4. Good point, and Pence and too many other hateful xenophobes.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to OhNo-Really (Original post)

Mon Apr 30, 2018, 06:40 PM

5. Let's please credit the author --

 

(which the DailyKos article did)

Dr. Laurence Britt
https://ratical.org/ratville/CAH/fasci14chars.html

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to RandomAccess (Reply #5)

Mon Apr 30, 2018, 06:45 PM

6. Good point. Done.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to OhNo-Really (Reply #6)

Mon Apr 30, 2018, 06:48 PM

7. +1

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to RandomAccess (Reply #7)

Mon Apr 30, 2018, 07:58 PM

10. Appreciate you

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to OhNo-Really (Original post)

Mon Apr 30, 2018, 06:56 PM

8. 14 for 14

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to OhNo-Really (Original post)

Mon Apr 30, 2018, 07:09 PM

9. We don't have much time left (no pun)

No, we don't. We have our first chance to turn things in November. All energy needs to be directed on a Democratic sweep, reducing Republican control and neutering Trump and his destructive impulses. And then again in 2020, another Republican electoral debacle and the successful election of a Democratic President.

Only then, will we be able to restore sanity and start repairing the damage that's been done. All hands on deck. The danger is very, very real.

Anyone who thinks this is over-the-top needs to read the list you provided. We're there, teetering on the edge.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to peggysue2 (Reply #9)

Mon Apr 30, 2018, 08:09 PM

11. I'm with you! We need Supersized Majorities to eliminate the GOP obstruction excuse imho

No Max Baucus types leading anything. Still seething........

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to OhNo-Really (Original post)

Mon Apr 30, 2018, 08:53 PM

12. You're sitting here talking about it publicly, so.....no

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to brooklynite (Reply #12)

Wed May 2, 2018, 12:27 PM

13. I survived speaking publically, so no

People speak out under fascist regimes and fall out of windows, etc

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to OhNo-Really (Reply #13)

Wed May 2, 2018, 01:16 PM

15. Care to point to an example here?

People who "fall out of winds" tend to be voices in the darkness while everyone else stays silent or plays along. Nothing in US broadcast, print or social media comes close to that.

nb - I've LIVED in a dictatorship with press cencorship. Flippant use of terms like "facism" and "police state" aren't very impressive.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to OhNo-Really (Original post)

Wed May 2, 2018, 12:54 PM

14. K & R

n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread