Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

misanthrope

(7,408 posts)
Fri Apr 20, 2018, 08:17 PM Apr 2018

I'm glad Mark Shields finally said it

When commenting on PBS Newshour about the death of Barbara Bush, the syndicated columnist mentioned what's been ignored in the days since the former first lady's passing. It's basically this: Barbara Bush seemed more genuine and humane in context of her predecessor. She later came off as being a bit high-handed but in comparison to Nancy Reagan and the 40th POTUS' reprehensible attitude toward the AIDS crisis then Bush looked like Clara Barton.

I can't get it to earmark at the 10:14 mark so just go there.

=614s
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I'm glad Mark Shields finally said it (Original Post) misanthrope Apr 2018 OP
They were just 2 Repukes, horrible Repukes, tia UTUSN Apr 2018 #1
It seems to me that republicans are born with a nastiness gene. justhanginon Apr 2018 #2
I agree with you 100% Ohiogal Apr 2018 #4
A bit high-handed? Demit Apr 2018 #3
Interesting you chose "misunderstood" misanthrope Apr 2018 #5
I thought it was about Mark Shields' comment about Barbara Bush. Demit Apr 2018 #6
Mark Shields' comment subtly implied the Reagans were heartless misanthrope Apr 2018 #7

justhanginon

(3,289 posts)
2. It seems to me that republicans are born with a nastiness gene.
Fri Apr 20, 2018, 08:55 PM
Apr 2018

With most of the republicans I have dealt with in my life, either in business or personally, there seems to be an undercurrent of nastiness buried under the surface. Sometimes it is closer to the surface than others but as you get to know them, at least to me, it seems to be lurking there.

 

Demit

(11,238 posts)
3. A bit high-handed?
Fri Apr 20, 2018, 08:56 PM
Apr 2018

WTF does that even mean? You think she was misunderstood?

Nixon had the best assessment of her: "Now there's a woman who knows how to hate."

She was genuine in that, all right.

misanthrope

(7,408 posts)
5. Interesting you chose "misunderstood"
Fri Apr 20, 2018, 11:13 PM
Apr 2018

Because that could be applied in numerous ways, either underestimating or overestimating any aspect of someone's personality.

Do you not realize this essentially a comment on Nancy Reagan far more than Barbara Bush?

 

Demit

(11,238 posts)
6. I thought it was about Mark Shields' comment about Barbara Bush.
Sat Apr 21, 2018, 04:04 AM
Apr 2018

And what she "came off as being." When someone uses that formation, it's usually to imply that whatever a person seems to be, deep down they really aren't.

If the real focus of his comment (or your post?) was Nancy Reagan, no, I didn't realize that.

misanthrope

(7,408 posts)
7. Mark Shields' comment subtly implied the Reagans were heartless
Sat Apr 21, 2018, 05:24 PM
Apr 2018

I couldn't agree more strongly with such a sentiment.

The conjoined point would be that Barbara Bush initially "came off as being" more genuine and caring early on in the Bush 41 era solely by contrast with a woman like Nancy Reagan. As time passed, the Reagan experience faded and Babs had more time to let her own words paint a more full picture of her, the public's view of her changed with it.

Using the phrase "a bit high-handed" is solely a modicum of grace through understatement.

There's all the subtext.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I'm glad Mark Shields fin...