Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Laura PourMeADrink

(42,770 posts)
Mon Jul 30, 2012, 08:26 AM Jul 2012

Thanks Ann, Learned something about Hobby Losses, thanks to You!

Romney's Olympic Dancing Horse Didn't Get Him Much Of A Tax Deduction (Yet)

Rafalca costs Mitt and Ann more money than most Americans make in a year. In 2010, the Romneys lost almost $78,000 on their famous horse and they only took a $50 deduction. But next year…

The Romneys declared a loss of $77,000 on their 2010 tax returns for the share in the care and feeding of Rafalca, which Mrs. Romney owns with Mr. Ebeling’s wife, Amy, and a family friend, Beth Meyers. That's actually a rounded down number; in fact, the passive investment loss that the Romneys reported on "Rob Rom Enterprises LLC," the limited liability company that owns Rafalca and pays for the horse's expenses, was closer to $78,000. The New York Times report led Matt Yglesias and some others to conclude, mistakenly, that the Romneys had taken a tax deduction for the full amount of their loss. That's not actually true.

An excerpt from Mitt and Ann Romney's 2010 tax return showing their declared loss for "Rob Rom Enterprises LLC"--the legal entity through which the Romneys and the Ebelings co-own Rafalca. When taxpayers report a loss, they aren't always able to take a deduction for it. The Romney's 2010 tax return (above) shows that the lion's share of the $77,731 "Rob Rom Enterprises" loss was, in the parlance of the tax code, "disallowed." That is, it wasn't eligible for a deduction in the 2010 tax year. The Romneys' actual "allowable loss"--the part that could be used for a deduction that year--was $50 (only 0.06% of the total declared loss).

The tax code doesn't typically allow the taxpayer to take general deductions for expenses on activities that the taxpayer doesn't undertake for a profit; these are called "hobby losses" and they can usually only be used to offset any incidental income the taxpayer gets from the same activity.

http://www.buzzfeed.com/nycsouthpaw/romneys-olympic-dancing-horse-didnt-get-him-much

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Thanks Ann, Learned something about Hobby Losses, thanks to You! (Original Post) Laura PourMeADrink Jul 2012 OP
Yeah, I was reading up on this yesterday. I gotta be honest... Curtland1015 Jul 2012 #1
i know...exactly the same thing I thought...You have to have money to make money Laura PourMeADrink Jul 2012 #2
P.S. Good last two games ! Knew when they threw Valentine out it would end that way. :>) Laura PourMeADrink Jul 2012 #3
we'll just revisit the issue when they release more than one year's tax returns. uncle ray Jul 2012 #4
Bet he will sell it when olympics over Laura PourMeADrink Jul 2012 #5

Curtland1015

(4,404 posts)
1. Yeah, I was reading up on this yesterday. I gotta be honest...
Mon Jul 30, 2012, 08:30 AM
Jul 2012

...reading about tax law minutiae makes my eyes go crossed.

Still, it's an interesting way to learn how rich people can hire very smart accountants to help them get around pretty much anything.

 

Laura PourMeADrink

(42,770 posts)
2. i know...exactly the same thing I thought...You have to have money to make money
Mon Jul 30, 2012, 08:43 AM
Jul 2012

You have to have money to pay for a great accountant. And you have to have a congress full of wealthy lawyers
who knew how to create tax code for the wealthy.

Wonder how many dollars the vast majority of people have paid in taxes that they didn't have to.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Thanks Ann, Learned somet...