General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsOMFG! He's asking for a line item veto (along with getting rid of the filibuster).
Will the subservient Republicans figure out a way to do it for him?
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,610 posts)Someone should read the Constitution to him. The Senate gets to decide those things; he doesn't.
hedda_foil
(16,371 posts)They're sublimely disinterested in their Article One powers. Trump, of course, has no idea whatsoever what is in the Constitution or even what the Constitution is.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,610 posts)even though they seem happy to enable his substantive destructions.
rsdsharp
(9,144 posts)Line item veto would require a constitutional amendment.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,610 posts)Supremes said the line-item veto is unconstitutional. That was 20 years ago. Not that Dolt 45 would know about or understand the whole separation of powers thing.
meadowlark5
(2,795 posts)Let it become more evident who owns his orange ass.
unblock
(52,126 posts)sunonmars
(8,656 posts)spanone
(135,795 posts)Last edited Fri Mar 23, 2018, 02:32 PM - Edit history (1)
line item veto...supreme court = no
filibuster....mcconnell = no
eat shit = trump
Ilsa
(61,690 posts)Was 20 years ago? I suppose they could revisit it, but I don't see why, when Rs have House and Senate and Executive branches.
MurrayDelph
(5,292 posts)The Republicans passed a line-item veto act, and brought Reagan or to celebrate with a big cake.
And as soon as Clinton was elected, the Republicans challenged the law they had just passed.
imanamerican63
(13,744 posts)I would not be surprised that it happened?
MiniMe
(21,709 posts)That is why Reid didn't get rid of it. It won't happen