Fri Mar 16, 2018, 07:13 AM

cbreezen (694 posts)

I pretty much figured that Mika and Joe's 3rd hour was a repeat...

But, there is too much Stormy Daniels crap in my opinion.

Unless she wants to tell us that she's Barron's mom, or she is raising his child, I'm not interested.

This will not be anything other than a salacious story. It's titillating for sure, but that's about it.

55 replies, 2617 views

Thread info Bookmark this thread Trash this thread

Reply to this thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

55 replies	Author	Time	Post
I pretty much figured that Mika and Joe's 3rd hour was a repeat... (Original post)	cbreezen	Mar 2018	OP
Except for the FEC violations	Blue_Adept	Mar 2018	#1
Post removed	Post removed	Mar 2018	#2
Trolls don't identify themselves. Look at my profile. nt	cbreezen	Mar 2018	#6
And they rarely pay subscriptions	malaise	Mar 2018	#10
Thanks. lol! nt	cbreezen	Mar 2018	#16
Post removed	Post removed	Mar 2018	#3
See reply to post 2. nt	cbreezen	Mar 2018	#7
This message was self-deleted by its author	njhoneybadger	Mar 2018	#14
...	SixString	Mar 2018	#35
Are you? Nt	Dr Hobbitstein	Mar 2018	#22
Stop it now.	FarPoint	Mar 2018	#25
Agreed. n/t	patricia92243	Mar 2018	#4
See reply to post 2. nt	cbreezen	Mar 2018	#8
You say Stormy Daniels crap like it's a bad thing.	dem4decades	Mar 2018	#5
I think the story is a distraction.	cbreezen	Mar 2018	#11
Boy if I had a dime for every time I've heard this "distraction" crap. n/t	Kirk Lover	Mar 2018	#17
How many stories does it takes to distract you? Two? Three?	LanternWaste	Mar 2018	#52
Whether picador or bullfighter himself, let justice, truth take down the treasonous bullshitter. -nt	poboy2	Mar 2018	#13
Enjoy your short stay! Nt	USALiberal	Mar 2018	#9
I've been here all evening posting about my own personal life. nt	cbreezen	Mar 2018	#12
I think it's a huge story	malaise	Mar 2018	#15
Totally agree. As I predicted when this first came out there is more to this	Kirk Lover	Mar 2018	#18
All I'm trying to say is that in the end...	cbreezen	Mar 2018	#20
That's not what you said at all	Blue_Adept	Mar 2018	#28
Well, I think you get what I'm saying...	cbreezen	Mar 2018	#31
I was puzzled why the press spent so much time on this when they usually lost	EffieBlack	Mar 2018	#26
+1,000	malaise	Mar 2018	#30
Thanks for letting us know. nt	LexVegas	Mar 2018	#19
Her lawyer disclosed that she was threatened with physical violence	spanone	Mar 2018	#21
I've worked in the legal system...	cbreezen	Mar 2018	#23
your prerogative.	spanone	Mar 2018	#24
Jonathan Turley was just on vouching for him	EffieBlack	Mar 2018	#27
I reserve judgment until I hear from Stephanie Clifford. nt	cbreezen	Mar 2018	#33
That doesn't mean Turley can vouch for the facts	jberryhill	Mar 2018	#38
I didnt say he was vouching for the facts	EffieBlack	Mar 2018	#40
DU has an ignore button	jberryhill	Mar 2018	#46
He didnt say the threat came during the breach of contract dispute	EffieBlack	Mar 2018	#48
Um...	jberryhill	Mar 2018	#49
As I said, as much as you seem to enjoy second-guessing other lawyers decisions,	EffieBlack	Mar 2018	#54
He paid her 130k just before the election to keep quiet. That's not a huge story to you?	brush	Mar 2018	#39
The fact of the payment has broader implications	jberryhill	Mar 2018	#45
A question	PJMcK	Mar 2018	#51
I've little doubt that's how you need to interpret the reactions.	LanternWaste	Mar 2018	#53
So your post discounting the importance of her story, that's you waiting til you hear it from her?	Squinch	Mar 2018	#44
Trump has been trying to distract from the Stormy Daniels story,	Ilsa	Mar 2018	#29
It's a distraction for US. Look at how many responses this post garnered.	cbreezen	Mar 2018	#32
...	LexVegas	Mar 2018	#34
I think I can handle more than one headline at a time,	Ilsa	Mar 2018	#55
Seems he's not the only one. Nothing to see here, doncha know?	Squinch	Mar 2018	#43
gosh	H2O Man	Mar 2018	#36
😁👍🏼	spanone	Mar 2018	#37
It's not just titillating. There are quite likely criminal actions involved in paying hush money out	Nitram	Mar 2018	#41
Thanks for this. It was making me anxious, not knowing your feelings about this and all.	Squinch	Mar 2018	#42
Beyond salacious: criminal threats, lying, lack of transparency, coverup, hypocrisy exposed. . . .nt	Bernardo de La Paz	Mar 2018	#47
It's not the sex, but the cover-up	HipChick	Mar 2018	#50

Response to cbreezen (Original post)

Fri Mar 16, 2018, 07:15 AM

Blue_Adept (6,139 posts)

1. Except for the FEC violations

Or the potential for blackmail.

Add in that the lawyer is now saying that she was physically threatened.

Or a host of other legal issues.

But, you know, that's just titillating stuff I guess.

I pretty much figured that Mika and Joe's 3rd hour was a repeat...

1. Except for the FEC violations

6. Trolls don't identify themselves. Look at my profile. nt

10. And they rarely pay subscriptions

16. Thanks. lol! nt

7. See reply to post 2. nt

35. ...

22. Are you? Nt

25. Stop it now.

4. Agreed. n/t

8. See reply to post 2. nt

5. You say Stormy Daniels crap like it's a bad thing.

11. I think the story is a distraction.

17. Boy if I had a dime for every time I've heard this "distraction" crap. n/t

52. How many stories does it takes to distract you? Two? Three?

13. Whether picador or bullfighter himself, let justice, truth take down the treasonous bullshitter. -nt

9. Enjoy your short stay! Nt

12. I've been here all evening posting about my own personal life. nt

15. I think it's a huge story

18. Totally agree. As I predicted when this first came out there is more to this

20. All I'm trying to say is that in the end...

28. That's not what you said at all

31. Well, I think you get what I'm saying...

26. I was puzzled why the press spent so much time on this when they usually lost

30. +1,000

19. Thanks for letting us know. nt

21. Her lawyer disclosed that she was threatened with physical violence

23. I've worked in the legal system...

24. your prerogative.

27. Jonathan Turley was just on vouching for him

33. I reserve judgment until I hear from Stephanie Clifford. nt

38. That doesn't mean Turley can vouch for the facts

40. I didnt say he was vouching for the facts

46. DU has an ignore button

48. He didnt say the threat came during the breach of contract dispute

49. Um...

54. As I said, as much as you seem to enjoy second-guessing other lawyers decisions,

39. He paid her 130k just before the election to keep quiet. That's not a huge story to you?

45. The fact of the payment has broader implications

51. A question

53. I've little doubt that's how you need to interpret the reactions.

44. So your post discounting the importance of her story, that's you waiting til you hear it from her?

29. Trump has been trying to distract from the Stormy Daniels story,

32. It's a distraction for US. Look at how many responses this post garnered.

34. ...

55. I think I can handle more than one headline at a time,

43. Seems he's not the only one. Nothing to see here, doncha know?

36. gosh

37. 😁👍🏼

41. It's not just titillating. There are quite likely criminal actions involved in paying hush money out

42. Thanks for this. It was making me anxious, not knowing your feelings about this and all.

47. Beyond salacious: criminal threats, lying, lack of transparency, coverup, hypocrisy exposed. . . .nt

50. It's not the sex, but the cover-up