Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pnwmom

(108,976 posts)
Wed Mar 14, 2018, 07:09 PM Mar 2018

What Conor Lamb, the "conservative," actually campaigned for.


?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fnewrepublic.com%2Farticle%2F147465%2Frepublicans-denial-trump-curse&tfw_creator=HeerJeet&tfw_site=newrepublic

Jon Favreau

@jonfavs
Conor Lamb campaigned:
1. For universal health care
2. Against Trump’s tax cut
3. For expanded background checks
4. For stronger unions
5. Against cuts to Social Security
6. For a woman’s right to choose
7. For medical marijuana

“Conservative Democrat.” Ok. Cool.
72 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What Conor Lamb, the "conservative," actually campaigned for. (Original Post) pnwmom Mar 2018 OP
K&R for Conor Lamb! sheshe2 Mar 2018 #1
Jinx You Owe Me A Coke Me. Mar 2018 #3
Thank You Me. Mar 2018 #2
Good point, Me.. it has to be! Cha Mar 2018 #13
Talk About Nuts Me. Mar 2018 #15
more sinister than that...and pathetic. Caliman73 Mar 2018 #19
Conservative only to the foolish Our Revolution types. nt Blue_true Mar 2018 #4
No need to call people foolish. zentrum Mar 2018 #20
And yet Trump is sitting in the Oval Office because of them. TheSmarterDog Mar 2018 #21
Critiquing Democrats zentrum Mar 2018 #22
Real, constructive critiques don't include an explicit threat to withhold support. TheSmarterDog Mar 2018 #23
Not true. Trump sits there for a lot of reasons. You could say that about any one of them. KPN Mar 2018 #30
And if any one of those reasons had been different, HRC would be in the WH. TheSmarterDog Mar 2018 #35
Speculation. You don't know why people on the left KPN Mar 2018 #64
True, but sadly betrayal by SOME on the left is one of them. Hortensis Mar 2018 #41
I agree with you on the 43% non voters or writeins. Blue_true Mar 2018 #66
Well, that would be an incredible effect for a minority of Hortensis Mar 2018 #72
Jesus Christ. Are we pretending he isn't a conservative Dem? Cuthbert Allgood Mar 2018 #60
Our Revolution are anarchists. Blue_true Mar 2018 #67
BTW. Blue_true Mar 2018 #68
He's a moderate Dem much like Biden and Obama. honest.abe Mar 2018 #5
That made him winnable in PA18! Cha Mar 2018 #10
Exactly. A Democratic winnable fit for the district. Hortensis Mar 2018 #42
And, President Obama & Veep Biden.. sure got a lot of PROGRESS Cha Mar 2018 #44
Exactly. God, I miss their solid good sense and decency. Hortensis Mar 2018 #47
K&R! mcar Mar 2018 #6
JFC, how long did it take to go from jubilation to grumbling about purity? ProudLib72 Mar 2018 #7
This is an effort by GOPers and some brocialists to dampen Dems' enthusiasm Maven Mar 2018 #8
Oh, for sure professional demotivators and dividers Hortensis Mar 2018 #43
This is a response to republicans who try claim lamb won on their issues JI7 Mar 2018 #11
Ok, but it seems like there have been some other posts about this ProudLib72 Mar 2018 #14
Seems like or there are? Here? KPN Mar 2018 #31
And, Conor Lamb himself knew how Cha Mar 2018 #9
If you want to say hello to the folks that think Lamb is too "conservative to be a Democrat" go here grantcart Mar 2018 #12
+1! KPN Mar 2018 #32
Without a doubt... Demsrule86 Mar 2018 #37
K&r! Docreed2003 Mar 2018 #16
That agenda is pretty much in line with the DSA. The_Casual_Observer Mar 2018 #17
Conor Lamb's agenda? KPN Mar 2018 #33
Just win, baby. - Al Davis BannonsLiver Mar 2018 #18
Great thread! R B Garr Mar 2018 #24
And before the election they claimed he was for Nancy Pelosi style lefty values IronLionZion Mar 2018 #25
:) Nancy's values are pretty mainstream Democrat, Hortensis Mar 2018 #55
I'm on board with that platform. PatrickforO Mar 2018 #26
House turns democratic after Nov Election! quartz007 Mar 2018 #27
THANK YOU Hekate Mar 2018 #28
You're welcome, Hekate! pnwmom Mar 2018 #29
Lamb did a couple things very well DeminPennswoods Mar 2018 #34
And shooting AR15s aikoaiko Mar 2018 #36
You have to get elected...notice I have never condemned Sen. Sanders for some of his votes on Demsrule86 Mar 2018 #39
I agree, but Lambs pro-AR15 stance is missing from many OPs on Lambs campaign aikoaiko Mar 2018 #49
I would like to see a ban on assault weapons myself...but you can't always get Demsrule86 Mar 2018 #52
And that is what our leadership should say. aikoaiko Mar 2018 #54
Absolutely. We agree on much actually. Demsrule86 Mar 2018 #63
People can love shooting and still support sensible gun laws IronLionZion Mar 2018 #48
Of course. But we are currrently waging a war against AR15 owners with threats of bans. aikoaiko Mar 2018 #51
Pew pew pew! Nt NCTraveler Mar 2018 #50
+1 aikoaiko Mar 2018 #53
Yeah, so? Its quite fun actually. BlueTsunami2018 Mar 2018 #56
Fine for you but Lamb is for civilian ownership of ARs as he currently is. aikoaiko Mar 2018 #57
K&R betsuni Mar 2018 #38
This is not actually true oberliner Mar 2018 #40
Are you trying to claim he is not for womens right to choose regardless of his stance? MrsCoffee Mar 2018 #59
No, I'm claiming that is not what he campaigned on oberliner Mar 2018 #62
He talked about expanded background checks and a woman's right to choose. Blue_true Mar 2018 #69
Only when asked oberliner Mar 2018 #70
How many people mention every position on their site? Blue_true Mar 2018 #71
In many ways, Lamb is practically a Bernie disciple! If that makes bullwinkle428 Mar 2018 #45
In the sense that Bernie prefers not to talk about abortion and gun control oberliner Mar 2018 #46
He's much closer to Joe Biden and other traditional Democrats than to Bernie. nt pnwmom Mar 2018 #61
They only call Conor Lamb "conservative" for one reason FakeNoose Mar 2018 #58
The Republicans never seem to get it, Foxwashed as they all seem to be DFW Mar 2018 #65

Me.

(35,454 posts)
2. Thank You
Wed Mar 14, 2018, 07:22 PM
Mar 2018

Maybe now we can cut out the nonsense. Also, another thing...I believe white women who previously voted for the Comrade in the WH are fed up and voted for Lamb and made a difference. So there's a lot of hooey being talked about the reason he won today and how DEms are going to have to trim their sails.

Cha

(297,154 posts)
13. Good point, Me.. it has to be!
Wed Mar 14, 2018, 07:40 PM
Mar 2018

Conor Lamb cut into the 2016 white women for trump vote. After this long.. he's lost the shine off his turd.

repubs on Conor's WIN!..





Me

Caliman73

(11,730 posts)
19. more sinister than that...and pathetic.
Wed Mar 14, 2018, 08:09 PM
Mar 2018

Their ideology CANNOT be wrong so they fit any facts that present themselves around their preferred narrative. It is really childish and sad, but unfortunately, it is also dangerous.

 

TheSmarterDog

(794 posts)
21. And yet Trump is sitting in the Oval Office because of them.
Wed Mar 14, 2018, 08:30 PM
Mar 2018

If they act foolishly (like attacking Democrats) they should be called foolish.

zentrum

(9,865 posts)
22. Critiquing Democrats
Wed Mar 14, 2018, 09:25 PM
Mar 2018

…is not attacking. Even Perez is critiquing the party in order to save it.

Most Bernie supporters voted for her in the general. They did not put Trump in the Oval Office. Our most progressive state came out for her in the general and she won there—because of 3M more voters, huge numbers of which were Bernie supporters and self-defined progressives.

If the Dems lost the electoral college it's because the HRC campaign made huge mistakes in not putting resources and visits into swing states and every Dem leader, including HRC, is admitting that. They are starting to change their messaging as well and recognizing they need to talk more about worker's issues, and economic issues and spend less time just attacking Trump, as they did in the general campaign. Do you even read the kinds of things good Democratic leaders are now saying about how the party needs to change?

Have you noticed how 17 Dems voted with Repugs to deregulate the Obama era bank regulations? This needs critiquing.

 

TheSmarterDog

(794 posts)
23. Real, constructive critiques don't include an explicit threat to withhold support.
Wed Mar 14, 2018, 09:37 PM
Mar 2018

Last edited Thu Mar 15, 2018, 08:25 AM - Edit history (1)

People who campaign against Democrats are not liberals or progressives.

 

TheSmarterDog

(794 posts)
35. And if any one of those reasons had been different, HRC would be in the WH.
Thu Mar 15, 2018, 08:25 AM
Mar 2018

The people on the Left who opposed Clinton believe the same lies about her that the people on the Right who opposed Clinton believe. That MAKES them foolish.

And those on the Left who opposed Clinton and withheld their support are wholly responsible for putting Trump in the WH, just as the Russian interference, the RW gerrymandering, the voter purges, the lies pushed by the RW media, etc etc. are each are wholly responsible also.

KPN

(15,642 posts)
64. Speculation. You don't know why people on the left
Thu Mar 15, 2018, 11:23 AM
Mar 2018

who chose not to vote or voted for another candidate did so. Claiming it was because of believing in Russian bot lies is a total fabrication with zero substantiation. Stop blaming people on the left here on DU. It serves no useful purpose when most if not all of them ( here at DU) are Democrats who vote for Democrats.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
41. True, but sadly betrayal by SOME on the left is one of them.
Thu Mar 15, 2018, 08:51 AM
Mar 2018

The numbers in those three key states ALONE proved that.

Their betrayal was not of Democrats of course, because none of us registered as Dems have an overriding duty to vote Dem, but betrayal of their own professed beliefs and goals.

Of course, their small numbers are nothing to those of the 40% who didn't vote at all (subtracting substantially for those disabled by age and other causes). Since the hard right votes in higher numbers and thus are less represented in this group, and since America's majority voters chose Democrat, it's reasonable to assume comfortably over half would have voted Democrat -- had they bothered.

Blue_true

(31,261 posts)
66. I agree with you on the 43% non voters or writeins.
Thu Mar 15, 2018, 02:59 PM
Mar 2018

Unfortunately, in many states, those foolish enough to writein would have counted as a non vote. Let's say the real non vote was 37-38%. You make an incisive point, the hard right was all in for Trump, my guess is 100% of them were sure to vote. So the 37-38% that did not vote at all was likely overwhelmingly voted for Clinton if they had made an effort to vote. The negative behavior of Our Revolution surely affected those people and caused them to stay home, IMO.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
72. Well, that would be an incredible effect for a minority of
Thu Mar 15, 2018, 05:39 PM
Mar 2018

pissant deluded hypocrites, imo. Forgive me if I really hope and believe you're wrong.

Let's remember that of those politically involved, over 90% of genuine Democratic voters* who had voted for her opponent supported Hillary when she became our nominee, leaving some of the remainder to join the radical militia who've been sniping from the ideological woods and others to straggle over to Stein or just not vote.

These real numbers are very revealing. Nothing like perspective for understanding.



* Pew's term after subtracting hostile conservative crossover voters who had no intention of voting Democrat for president.

Cuthbert Allgood

(4,916 posts)
60. Jesus Christ. Are we pretending he isn't a conservative Dem?
Thu Mar 15, 2018, 09:37 AM
Mar 2018

Because he is. And I get that is what was needed to win that seat.

But if you are going to argue that we need to keep pushing the party to the right and that those of us that want the party to stay to it's liberal roots are "Our Revolution types" then sign me the fuck up for that revolution. Because if the Dems just sell out completely to the middle, then fuck that.

Blue_true

(31,261 posts)
67. Our Revolution are anarchists.
Thu Mar 15, 2018, 03:05 PM
Mar 2018

The runoff elections in Texas will be informative, if the Our Revolution candidates lose, but turn around and fully support the nominee, then I will take them seriously. What I expect from them if they lose the runoff is to throw a shitstorm and make it harder for the democrat to win the General.

Blue_true

(31,261 posts)
68. BTW.
Thu Mar 15, 2018, 03:18 PM
Mar 2018

Lamb is not conservative:

Abortion: Pro-Life BUT feel that womens' right to chose should not be violated by laws.

Worker rights: Pro Union, Pro fair trade that does not victimize workers.

Tax Cuts: Clearly stated while campaigning that tax cuts done by republicans was a giveaway to the rich and corporations.


Guns: Does not support banning guns, but does support a strong background check system where people are fully vetted before they can buy guns.

Education: Support public schools and spending more money on public education.

The only issue that he can be considered remotely conservative on is guns, but Bernie Sanders takes the exact same position. Does Bernie's position on guns make him conservative.

On calling Our Revolution foolish, it is what it is, there is no other appropriate word. When one sees a fucking train speeding down a track at one, but not only do one not jump off the track, but one holds one's compatriots on the track with one, such behavior is fucking foolish, full stop, pure and simple.

Cha

(297,154 posts)
44. And, President Obama & Veep Biden.. sure got a lot of PROGRESS
Thu Mar 15, 2018, 08:56 AM
Mar 2018

done.. for what ever label they want to snag them with.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
47. Exactly. God, I miss their solid good sense and decency.
Thu Mar 15, 2018, 08:59 AM
Mar 2018

And their commitment to the liberalism and progressivism our nation was founded on.

ProudLib72

(17,984 posts)
7. JFC, how long did it take to go from jubilation to grumbling about purity?
Wed Mar 14, 2018, 07:29 PM
Mar 2018

WTF is wrong with us that we must nitpick every person who comes along?

Maven

(10,533 posts)
8. This is an effort by GOPers and some brocialists to dampen Dems' enthusiasm
Wed Mar 14, 2018, 07:31 PM
Mar 2018

after what was an absolutely stunning upset victory.

Ignore both groups. We won!

ProudLib72

(17,984 posts)
14. Ok, but it seems like there have been some other posts about this
Wed Mar 14, 2018, 07:42 PM
Mar 2018

I'll just take it as you say: rethugs trying to sow discord.

Cha

(297,154 posts)
9. And, Conor Lamb himself knew how
Wed Mar 14, 2018, 07:33 PM
Mar 2018

communicate that he was the best one for PA18..




Thank you for this, pnwmom.. It's so Wonderful that Conor Won!

We could be having an entirely different discussion today!

grantcart

(53,061 posts)
12. If you want to say hello to the folks that think Lamb is too "conservative to be a Democrat" go here
Wed Mar 14, 2018, 07:35 PM
Mar 2018

Use this service to say "hi" or "fuck off" in their mother tongue.

IronLionZion

(45,427 posts)
25. And before the election they claimed he was for Nancy Pelosi style lefty values
Wed Mar 14, 2018, 09:46 PM
Mar 2018

and way too liberal for rural western PA

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
55. :) Nancy's values are pretty mainstream Democrat,
Thu Mar 15, 2018, 09:18 AM
Mar 2018

Iron. Lamb may be genuinely more centrist on some issues, but he's still clearly liberal in his orientation. He'll fit better with the Democratic caucus serving their common ideology than with the Republican constituents he'll have to learn to also serve.

Fortunately, many of his colleagues will be able to help. Far more legislation is passed in congress than we ever hear about, and VOTERS on the right and left, including the Our Revolution left, actually have most wishes in common. Conscientious and principled politicians usually find ways to serve most.

Hekate

(90,645 posts)
28. THANK YOU
Wed Mar 14, 2018, 10:21 PM
Mar 2018

The garbage that has been posted today has had me on the verge of taking a very long break. All of it -- garbage against Nancy Pelosi, Hillary Clinton, and Conor Lamb.

Probably more I didn't see, but on Monday the hard slam by a DUer on whoever climbed up on a Gun Show billboard and hung 17 crosses from it made me more angry than anything I've ever read here by a DUer.

"Snatching defeat from the jaws of victory"

DeminPennswoods

(15,278 posts)
34. Lamb did a couple things very well
Wed Mar 14, 2018, 11:13 PM
Mar 2018

He focused on economic security issues like social security, medicare, healthcare and just as importantly private pensions. This is what, imho, got him a lot of his union support. There has been a systematic assault on pensions by companies ditching, sometimes by declaring bankruptcy, their pension obligations to retirees. Often the pensions are sloughed off to the seriously underfunded federal govt pension guarantee protection board.

He explained how the GOP tax cut will ultimately undermine the gov't's ability to fund social security and medicare/medicaid.

He pointed out how we all pay into social security, medicare, unemployment compensation and all eventually use some or all of those benefits we pay for.

He emphasized he wants government to work and that's what the vast majority of Americans want, too.

aikoaiko

(34,169 posts)
36. And shooting AR15s
Thu Mar 15, 2018, 08:41 AM
Mar 2018

[IMG][/IMG]

This image from his ads with a voiceover saying “ he still loves shooting” also helped.

Demsrule86

(68,552 posts)
39. You have to get elected...notice I have never condemned Sen. Sanders for some of his votes on
Thu Mar 15, 2018, 08:46 AM
Mar 2018

guns...he hails from Vermont and must represent his state...and being a gun 'grabber' is a no no in Vermont where people hunt and like guns. I will settle for a majority and increased background checks...otherwise we get nothing.

aikoaiko

(34,169 posts)
49. I agree, but Lambs pro-AR15 stance is missing from many OPs on Lambs campaign
Thu Mar 15, 2018, 09:07 AM
Mar 2018

I’m for improving gun control but like Lamb I don’t support banning AR15s. I could even go for special restrictions on ARs, but not bans.

As long as Democrats, especially our elected leaders, keep talking about and sending in bills to ban guns, we will jeopardize candidates like Lamb. .

Demsrule86

(68,552 posts)
52. I would like to see a ban on assault weapons myself...but you can't always get
Thu Mar 15, 2018, 09:13 AM
Mar 2018

what you want...I will settle for increased background checks.

aikoaiko

(34,169 posts)
54. And that is what our leadership should say.
Thu Mar 15, 2018, 09:15 AM
Mar 2018

It’s nice that you and I have common ground on background checks.

IronLionZion

(45,427 posts)
48. People can love shooting and still support sensible gun laws
Thu Mar 15, 2018, 09:03 AM
Mar 2018

Even the worst Dems will vote correctly on many important economic issues, cabinet confirmations, judicial appointments, etc.

When we finally have a chance to impeach and remove Trump, we're going to need as many votes as possible.

aikoaiko

(34,169 posts)
51. Of course. But we are currrently waging a war against AR15 owners with threats of bans.
Thu Mar 15, 2018, 09:11 AM
Mar 2018


Like Lamb I dont support gun bans but we do support universal background checks and other methods to reduce gun ills Dd. It gun bans.

BlueTsunami2018

(3,490 posts)
56. Yeah, so? Its quite fun actually.
Thu Mar 15, 2018, 09:24 AM
Mar 2018

I see nothing wrong with going to a range, renting one of those guns or even machine guns and blasting away. You just can’t leave with it. Ban them for civilian ownership except by special licensing like they have for machine guns now but allow people to fire them at ranges all they want.

Win/win.

aikoaiko

(34,169 posts)
57. Fine for you but Lamb is for civilian ownership of ARs as he currently is.
Thu Mar 15, 2018, 09:30 AM
Mar 2018


And you should know that the current version of the proposed AWB would not allow ranges to purchase ARs after the ban goes into effect.
 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
40. This is not actually true
Thu Mar 15, 2018, 08:48 AM
Mar 2018

He campaigned for:

1. Fighting the heroin crisis

2. Improving infrastructure and job training programs

3. Addressing health care (re-establishing and improving the ACA)

4. Protecting Medicare and Social Security

5. Reforming the student loan system

6. Supporting unions

He did NOT campaign for expanded background checks or for a woman's right to choose. In fact he does not mention either of these topics at all on his campaign website.

MrsCoffee

(5,801 posts)
59. Are you trying to claim he is not for womens right to choose regardless of his stance?
Thu Mar 15, 2018, 09:36 AM
Mar 2018

Or just trying to muddy the waters?

He is pro-choice. He is a prosecutor who believes that the law is the law and a right is a right. He believes in separation of church and state and opposed Republicans 20 week ban.

Who is going to take you seriously after you ran around claiming Heath Mello was thrown under the bus?

Give me a fucking break.



 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
62. No, I'm claiming that is not what he campaigned on
Thu Mar 15, 2018, 10:34 AM
Mar 2018

Abortion only came up when he was asked about it.

He does not mention the issue on his website (where he has a list of Campaign Priorities) nor did he include the topic in any of his campaign speeches.

The issues he campaigned on were the ones I listed above.

Blue_true

(31,261 posts)
69. He talked about expanded background checks and a woman's right to choose.
Thu Mar 15, 2018, 03:26 PM
Mar 2018

And he supported both, even though he is personally pro choice and think people should have guns if they pass background checks. Bernie Sanders have pretty much the same position on guns, except Bernie would ban assault weapons.

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
70. Only when asked
Thu Mar 15, 2018, 03:33 PM
Mar 2018

Neither abortion nor gun control appear anywhere on the Conor Lamb for Congress website.

His campaign website lists seven topics under "My Priorities" : Heroin Crisis, Jobs and Infrastructure, Affordable Health Care, Protecting Medicate and Social Security, Releasing Students from Lifetime Debt Traps, Unions, and Modern Energy Development.

Those were the issues he campaigned on.

Blue_true

(31,261 posts)
71. How many people mention every position on their site?
Thu Mar 15, 2018, 03:40 PM
Mar 2018

Sort of a petty thing to ring him up for. When asked, he gave workable answers. I certainly prefer him over the republican.

bullwinkle428

(20,629 posts)
45. In many ways, Lamb is practically a Bernie disciple! If that makes
Thu Mar 15, 2018, 08:56 AM
Mar 2018

heads explode, either on the part of unhinged Bernie-Bros, or absolute party loyalists, so be it. Lamb's victory should be seen as a damn good thing if you're invested in the Democratic party in any way.

FakeNoose

(32,633 posts)
58. They only call Conor Lamb "conservative" for one reason
Thu Mar 15, 2018, 09:35 AM
Mar 2018

Because of the photo that was widely distributed of him on a rifle range - they made all kinds of assumptions.

Not true! Not conservative, just middle of the road like most other Democrats. No candidate is perfect - the only thing that matters is yep, he's a Democrat.

DFW

(54,349 posts)
65. The Republicans never seem to get it, Foxwashed as they all seem to be
Thu Mar 15, 2018, 11:29 AM
Mar 2018

You can easily be:

1. For universal health care
2. Against Trump’s tax cut
3. For expanded background checks
4. For stronger unions
5. Against cuts to Social Security
6. For a woman’s right to choose
7. For medical marijuana

and still be conservative (as opposed to "a" conservative as defined in Republicanese).

He seems to dress conservatively, probably doesn't take big risks, probably doesn't do a lot of dope or alcohol, may well have a traditional, unflashy lifestyle. In other words, he could well be conservative. That in NO WAY would prevent him having the seven points of view listed above. Only foxsuckers think that the word "conservative" means the same thing as "right wing extremist."

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What Conor Lamb, the "con...