General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJames Holmes Claims Amnesia: Alleged 'Dark Knight' Shooter Wonders Why He's Arrested
James Holmes, the suspected shooter in last week's movie theater massacre, has told his Colorado jailers he doesn't know why he's locked behind bars, the Daily News reports.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/07/27/james-holmes-amnesia_n_1709573.html
I seriously hope nobody on the planet believes this bullshit. This asshole thinks he's so much smarter than everyone else he can pull this off. I'll bet the did it just to see if he can get away with it. Get a rope.
HopeHoops
(47,675 posts)Tom Ripley
(4,945 posts)cthulu2016
(10,960 posts)Lovely
Wait Wut
(8,492 posts)Give him back his notebook...
Hand him all the receipts for the guns/ammo/etc. he had been ordering over months...
Post pictures of the innocent lives he stole all over his cell. Force him to read letters from the survivors.
That should help.
proud patriot
(100,704 posts)MadHound
(34,179 posts)This could very well be the case.
Just because somebody is smart doesn't make them a good or convincing actor.
atreides1
(16,067 posts)No evidence of that so far...and his actions don't mean he's mentally ill.
MadHound
(34,179 posts)Perhaps it won't hold up to a legal challenge, but I guarantee you that something upstairs has slipped, badly, when that happens. Normal, sane people don't shoot down people in cold blood for no reason.
slackmaster
(60,567 posts)Mental illness and mental incompetence are completely different concepts. A person can be mentally incompetent simply due to low intelligence. A paranoid schizophrenic can be severely mentally ill but still able to tell right from wrong. OTOH someone who is having severe hallucinations may be found to be incompetent.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)White mass murderers are always mentally ill, the poor dears. Have you no heart?
slackmaster
(60,567 posts)HappyMe
(20,277 posts)struggle4progress
(118,236 posts)J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 35:4:469-480 (December 2007)
Dominique Bourget, MD and
Laurie Whitehurst, PhD
... In a recent Canadian case, a nurse experienced a dissociative episode when an elderly bedridden patient yelled at her for accidentally spilling a bedpan. With her emotional triggers setting off her dissociative behavior, she did not recall using a metal table leg to strike repeatedly and kill the patient, who died of a severe brain injury. She had had previous amnestic episodes and received a diagnosis of dissociative disorder ...
Offenders who claim amnesia for crimes are, on average, older and may have more prior convictions than those who do not claim amnesia. It has been noted that offenders who claim crime-related dissociative amnesia often alert the police to their crimes and are less likely to deny the offense than are those who do not claim amnesia ...
Amnesia due to a psychotic episode is illustrated in a case examined by one of the authors (DB), of a man in his early 20s who was involved in repeated incidents of physical assault on adolescent victims. The man's behavior and thinking were severely disorganized, and he was unable to provide a coherent account of the incidents. His psychotic state and disorganized, unpredictable behavior had developed in a progressive fashion ...
Another interpretation of crime-related amnesia acknowledges the likelihood that some offenders intentionally fabricate memory loss to avoid punishment for a crime or for other personal gain. While an early study reported that 20 percent of the offenders claiming amnesia were fabricating the memory loss, it has been suggested that the rate of malingering is higher. The likelihood of malingered amnesia may be greater in offenders with antisocial personality disorder. Using polygraphy, Lynch and Bradford showed that offenders with antisocial personality disorder have a higher propensity to feign amnesia for crimes, compared with those with no personality disorder or other psychopathologic disorders. It has been suggested that offenders with antisocial personality disorder may be prone to malingering amnesia for crimes in part because of the tendencies of manipulation, habitual deceit, and a general poverty in major affective reactions that characterize this disorder. Other authors have noted the possible contribution of low intelligence and frontal executive dysfunction to the feigning of amnesia for crimes. However, as it is possible that highly intelligent malingerers are more adept at feigning amnesia for crimes and may thus evade detection and less frequently receive a diagnosis of malingering, further research may help to clarify a link between low intelligence/frontal executive dysfunction and feigned amnesia ...
http://www.jaapl.org/content/35/4/469.full
informative article, from a canadian legal pov
RKP5637
(67,088 posts)RedStateLiberal
(1,374 posts)The conspiracy theory paranoids will have a field day with this. I'm sure he's some kind of "manchurian candidate" brainwashed by the UN or some other BS.
Tom Ripley
(4,945 posts)nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)1.- Dad did programing for financial company (True), therefore, he was about to testify to Congress on LIBOR. (Jump)
2.- There was an exercise for disaster exercise involving a mass shooting in a theater (true), therefore this was a false flag operation, (jump)
I just love some of the way fantasy conspiracies come.
Tom Ripley
(4,945 posts)nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)Tom Ripley
(4,945 posts)RedStateLiberal
(1,374 posts)COLGATE4
(14,732 posts)Tom Ripley
(4,945 posts)SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)RedStateLiberal
(1,374 posts)tiny elvis
(979 posts)RedStateLiberal
(1,374 posts)so I didn't get the reference.
It looked like a reply directed at me telling me to "calm the hell down" but I get it now.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)You would not go through the legal process since it would make you feel better? Guess what, that is not what civilized societies do.
secondly, as shocking as it might be to you, this is also another REASON FOR THE LEGALLY REQUIRED COMPETENCY HEARING, this is classic dissociative behavior... but hey,
Get a rope, that speaks volumes about YOU.
CanonRay
(14,084 posts)just a figure of speech as if to say there's no way he can get away with this. He'll get his trial...just wish I could get on the jury. Jeez, you people are touchy.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)you do not belong in the jury.
And should be disqualified from it very fast.
zappaman
(20,606 posts)Do you ever stop?
white_wolf
(6,238 posts)MNBrewer
(8,462 posts)And the OP doesn't belong on a jury for this (or probably any other) crime.
Get a rope, indeed.
MNBrewer
(8,462 posts)You are completely incapable of providing an objective verdict as evidenced by your "get a rope" comment.
Hassin Bin Sober
(26,315 posts)How so?
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)But we saw it often with Psychiatric patients.
This is why A COMPETENCY HEARING IS ESSENTIAL to establish that while he might be loon as can be, he UNDERSTANDS what is going on and CAN STAND TRIAL.
Hassin Bin Sober
(26,315 posts)... how someone can plan for a month, spend hundreds (thousands?) of dollars in preparation via internet and mail. Post on dating sites hinting at his crimes. Set booby traps. Do the murders. Tell the cops his place is booby-trapped.
And THEN claim amnesia.
How is that a "classic" case?
You will have to tell me your credentials if I am to defer to your "knowledge" on the matter. If your experience consists, as I suspect, of only driving an ambulance, your experience is lacking to make such a complex case diagnosis.
zappaman
(20,606 posts)Suffice it to say, you have not watched many movies.
Sometimes just falling down can bring about amnesia.
After you do some reading, check out a couple of the 3 STOOGES shorts that feature amnesia.
Also, questioning the knowledge of the one person on DU who knows it all is a bit silly, yup.
slackmaster
(60,567 posts)HTH
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)bob. I am patiently waiting for the COMPETENCY hearing...
But whatever bob, welcome to the ignore list, I have repeatedly said we NEED TO WAIT FOR IT.
Though evidence continues to emerge that INDEED WE NEED ONE and that INDEED THIS BOY was under the care of a psychiatrist.
Now if suggesting that this is a POSSIBILITY is making a diagnosis, then perhaps you need to learn how to fracking read.
Hassin Bin Sober
(26,315 posts)When I asked you how, you told me to "read on it" and "we saw it often with Psychiatric patients"
Now you are saying the complete opposite.
It's a classic case alright: make a ridiculous assertion, demand the other poster "read on it", and then act all condescending and "ignore" when called on it.
slackmaster
(60,567 posts)Her suicide attempt was plain as day to two police officers, a psychiatric nurse, and to me. But she didn't see it, and insisted until the day she succeeded in taking her own life that it was all just a cry for attention.
Duer 157099
(17,742 posts)The number of times we've heard that excuse... shouldn't be surprising that the little people are using it now too
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)So much for my guess that he is mentally ill.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)why we need a competency hearing.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)So I'm not going to pretend to be one. I'll wait and see what comes out before I make judgments. It seems odd that he could plan all of this and not remember it, but I'm no expert in psychiatry. Obviously *something* is gravely wrong with him if he could do this, but what to do with him is up to the experts.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)Oh, he'll get a competency hearing, and he'll attempt to con the psychiatrists. But in the end, he'll be judged legally sane and competent to stand trial. He did't suddenly snap, there were months of careful planning before the crime... months of knowing exactly what he was doing.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)is very much higher than being plainly mentally ill. He might as well be a loon, and still be declared able to stand trial. Or if he meets the standard, same fate as Loughner... who also had some planning.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)There's no question there's something wrong with him. Here in FL, the bar is very high for a "not guilty by reason of insanity" case. Defendant pretty much has to be a drooling babbling idiot completely unaware of his surroundings or actions. I don't know where Colorado sets the bar.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)the reason why Loughner has not gone beyond the competency hearing and is heavily medicated, is that he was completely out of it.
Holmes behavior tells me he might very well be schizophrenic, he may very well have had a dissociative episode, and it matches for when Schizo shows up. In my mind, if he spends the rest of his life in a hospital for the mentally insane or prison, is immaterial to me. That boy, like Loughner, ain't seeing freedom anytime soon.
Now if Holmes ends in a similar limbo as Loughner, we really need to ask how we, as a society, can detect these issues earlier, and chiefly treat them? Part of the complex response we need to these things.
zappaman
(20,606 posts)you are also a doctor?
Good to know!
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)I was not aware that standard was nationally uniform.
Agree with you about diagnosing these people early, and getting them in treatment. Not sure how that can be done... especially if they refuse and have no prior instances of violence. In Holmes' case, there were plenty of red flags, but no one in a position to see them all... just one usually isn't enough to trigger alarms.
His competency will be decided on whether he's competent to aid in his defense or not. Given his proven ability to plan well in advance, no matter his mental state at the crime scene, I'd say he has a tough row to hoe. I would expect psychiatrists would be able to root out the conjobs and manipulators, and thats my reading of Holmes. I'm no expert, though.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)the insanity defense is standard. And whether he will meet that or not time will tell.
I remember with Loughner many here said he was acting too. So at this point we all can wait.
But for the moment we do know, emerged today, that he was indeed under the care of an MD.
For the record, Loughner was not.
rox63
(9,464 posts)I don't see this strategy getting him anywhere.
Response to CanonRay (Original post)
SidDithers This message was self-deleted by its author.
Brickbat
(19,339 posts)siligut
(12,272 posts)There just isn't enough information available to us to determine that. Dissociative disorders do indeed exist and it is possible for an alter personality to take over for an extended period of time. The dyed hair, that he was just standing around after the shooting, that he had been seeing a psychiatrist, these things that we have been told give some credence to his story.
Leave it to the professionals and hope they are good enough to do their job.
soccer1
(343 posts)This can happen to people who have been traumatized.If that were to be the case, I doubt that would be accepted as a symptom of "legal insanity",unless he was in an altered state during the rampage....but the planning he did wouldn't seem to point to that. He'll be evaluated.....will be interesting. I doubt he'll win a legal insanity defense....but all these "symptoms" will be helpful for the defense....if not for the verdict, for the sentencing phase.
treestar
(82,383 posts)Not that it's an excuse or anything, but psychologically it counts as a traumatizing incident.
mike_c
(36,269 posts)...so let's all "get a rope" and meet in the town square at midnight! Torches and pitchforks!
Douglas Carpenter
(20,226 posts)HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)The competency hearing os held to answer the questions:
Did he know right from wrong?
Is (was) he aware of his surroundings?
Is he capable of assisting lawyers in his defense?
eShirl
(18,479 posts)zappaman
(20,606 posts)Don't you watch movies?
Ruby the Liberal
(26,219 posts)The book, not the movie adaption (which was lousy in comparison).
"What if there never was an Aaron..."
slackmaster
(60,567 posts)From my comfortable window seat with a nice view, hundreds of miles away, I am not going to presume to say what is going inside of that troubled young man's head.
He's obviously very deeply disturbed. Maybe he's lying, maybe not. It really doesn't matter.
proud patriot
(100,704 posts)what does he want us to believe he's dr jekyl and mr hyde ..... no no no he may have studied nuero science, but I seriously doubt it.
Judi Lynn
(160,450 posts)Gin
(7,212 posts)The influence of Ambien.... Just adding my 2 cents.
Lex
(34,108 posts)CanonRay
(14,084 posts)Again, jeez you people are touchy.
librechik
(30,674 posts)In our society. some of the responses make me lose hope for mankind.
Please leave the diagnoses to the experts. You have nothing but a sharp tongue to back up your opinion. Are you a trained psychiatrist? If not, take it to yahoo. You don't know what you are talking about.
CanonRay
(14,084 posts)Apparently, that is not as common as previously thought.
librechik
(30,674 posts)look up mercy in the dictionary. You might not know the depth of such a concept
slackmaster
(60,567 posts)James Holmes is obviously deeply disturbed. Details like whether he really remembers what he did or not are not important, and may be unknowable.
What matters to the court is whether or not he is mentally competent to stand trial. The court will decide one way or another. That fork in the road will have a huge impact on how the state treats the defendant, but either way he'll never walk free again.
Lex
(34,108 posts)MNBrewer
(8,462 posts)Who needs that silly "due process" any more. That's so 18th Century. The world changed on 9/11 after all, right?
Skidmore
(37,364 posts)Call me shocked!
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)Isn't the same as saying he doesn't remember. In his twisted mind he might wonder what all the fuss is about. He just shot 70 people. He might have seen hundreds of violent acts in movies where the villain gets away with a lot more than that. OTOH, he might be saying he has amnesia. He might actually have amnesia. But, it doesn't matter amnesia doesn't make a person innocent of a crime. I really don't care if he ends up in jail or a mental institution for the rest of his life.