Wait a minute-Dump is in EXCELLENT HEALTH! His cardiac calcium score is 130! I just

based on this simple fact.
You can only fool the sheeple and not forever.

and great genes and a pile of other crap.

but those good jeans can't fit him

Sources:

• National Institutes of Health


• Men's Health Magazine


• Psych Central

had as much credibility as raygun's hair color.

Perfect

A score over 100 means you have moderate plaque and are considered to have heart disease.

101-400: Definite, at least moderate atherosclerotic plaque. Mild coronary artery disease highly likely.

https://www.umm.edu/programs/diagnosticrad/services/technology/ct/cardiac-calcium-scoring

A well known case, Tim Russert, had a calcium score of 210 in 1998 when he was 48 yrs old....He died a decade later...

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/24/health/24hear.html

In 2009, his score was 34

In 2013, his score was 98

Now it's 133.

Looking good!

On the desk in the Oval Office.
Next to the Oval Orifice in the bathroom.
Arranged in a lovely pyramid on the golden pillow in the bedroom.
At every seat in the conference room.
Piled up on the tray table in Marine 1.

Tell him that the highest score wins and get him to compete with Chris Christie.

With lots of extra salt. And Coke.

And alternate with a bucket of KFC's finest extra crispy.

Only the best for him!

all those doctors talking about risk factors for heart disease are just babbling killjoys spouting fake science.

Go ahead and indulge yourself, donnie. You know you deserve it.

his arterial reviews are HUUUUUUUGE !

... 120 and I was put on a staton

... didn't have her hair on fire.

I'm trying to lose weight because BMI is too high, I can see where Red Don would be 240 lbs but that would mean he's basically a bag fat which would explain his very slow speed of processing and horrible working memory.

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/17/us/politics/trump-physical-heart-health-cholesterol.htm

"Dr. Topol disagreed with Dr. Gupta about the calcium test, which measures the amount of plaque containing calcium in a person’s blood. Higher numbers indicate the development of coronary artery disease, which could lead to dangerous blockages in the heart.

But Dr. Topol said he would not be concerned unless a patient of Mr. Trump’s age came to him with calcium levels of 700 or more.

“That tells you there’s some calcium,” he said. “It doesn’t tell you whether that’s inside or outside the arteries. That doesn’t tell me the risk.”

...and the fact that at 76, Trump isn't very likely to live more than another 10-15 years even if his health is perfect. The test result represents a cumulative risk per year, and a young person has more future years over which to integrate that risk if it isn't addressed.

My cardiologist (I got a spiffy new stent for my 50th birthday, 4 years ago) told me it's all about whether to cath. An angiogram is the only test that is definitive as to whether you are in danger, but it's invasive and costs tens of thousands of dollars. (It also provides for some service possibilities, such as the aforementioned stent.)

My doctor told me that all the other tests are iffy at best. He said he recently had a patient pass a nuclear stress test, a different kind of scan which measures blood flow in the different areas of the heart at rest and under stress, with flying colors. This is a more expensive and "better" test for Coronary Artery Disease than the calcium scan. Dude still had a heart attack two weeks later.

But at Trump's age, you have to justify the cost and possible dangerous complications of a cath. (Angiograms are called "caths" after the catheter which is used to thread your arteries.) At 50, it was worth taking me to the cath lab on the basis of a few numbers that were way out of whack. For someone closer to their natural life expectancy, you have to be much more certain you're addressing an immediate risk to justify the cost and risks of the procedure.

is a new fat off-shore bank account....... ,heh?

private

orders. he is duty bound to follow orders. No exceptions except if the order is illegal in a military code of conduct sense, and there isn't any indication this would be....

I hate to say it.

Trump's score indicates the same likely risk per future year as it would for a 50-year-old, but the 50 year old has a lot more future years over which to integrate that risk, so it makes more sense economically to spend $30K performing an angiogram on him just in case something really is seriously wrong.

feel uncomfortable watching the doctor giving the press conference, he seemed nervous and unsure of himself, the way he kept repeating 'you know', could he possible have been coerced to give Trump a better report than he should have.

my reaction exactly. He looked sweaty and nervous.

Just more coerced propaganda from the pukes. Great Leader is infallible!


Bet he didn't have to pull any stunts after President Obama's physicals.

Oh, and the affair devolved into outright creepiness when the good dr. started talking about dump's "good genes". Eerily disturbing after all the recent racism.

He's military and pres (even a dumbshit pres is commander in chief

Calcium build up in the arteries over time as we move into old age is natural. Women's breast get calcium too. You look at the ten year risk number. For a guy in his seventies, this is a good score.

I understand the disappointed people, but that's not a bad score.

Normal calcium levels in the blood range from 8.8 to 10.4 mg/dL in adults.

You are not even in the same county let alone ballpark.

Calcium scoring has nothing to with blood calcium levels. Soft plaques are fatty and unstable. Over time, they tend to calcify. This test measures arterial calcium which should correlate to plaques.

along with the fake Times cover.

Why will no reporter ask what handicap the doctor gave him? He scored 130 with a handicap of 100.

"A score of 100 to 300 — moderate plaque deposition — is associated with a relatively high risk of heart attack or other heart disease over the next three to five years."

https://www.mayoclinic.org/tests-procedures/heart-scan/about/pac-20384686

my calcium level was 9.2 and I am also 76. Thus my calcium level was very much within normal range. The orange one is WAY above normal. Normal calcium levels in the blood range from 8.8 to 10.4 mg/dL in adults.