General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsChelsea Manning releases a campaign ad
?t=71ETA: it doesn't sound like they think (or she thinks) she is running to win, imo
elleng
(130,865 posts)Sorry she's running in Maryland, where our Senators are often for the people.
louis c
(8,652 posts)Don't fall for more of this Russian placed bullshit to divide Democrats.
Haven't you learned your lesson, yet?
elleng
(130,865 posts)louis c.
louis c
(8,652 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, don't you? He will lead the committee when we take control of the senate in 2018 and is committed to smashing Putin's plans for hegemony.
Cardin's a very strong, competent, liberal Democrat and a senate leader in general as well.
THAT is why the Russians and the GOP really NEED to destroy him.
What has Cardin he done to make YOU feel replacing a fine man like him with a complete amateur without a day of government experience like Manning would be a positive step? It's also not irrelevant at all that, if he were elected, not only would he be profoundly incompetent, but the election of someone many millions see as a traitor would do terrible damage to the party. Could that be it?
Seems more than a little trumpster-firish in all respects to me.
elleng
(130,865 posts)My 'thanks for the reprimand' was :sarcastic: Sorry you didn't catch it.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)and I am sorry for that. But seriously, "she's right?"
Didn't this strike you as a left-wing populist version of extreme right-wing populist fear- and hostility-mongering? I'd say "trumpian," but this dark, violence-trolling ad almost makes Trump's populism look like a teddy-bear version in comparison.
Where is the sunny, reasonably prosperous, just, stable America we actually almost all still live in in this repellent message?
elleng
(130,865 posts)'we actually ALMOST all still live in,' and we all must recognize the extent that the 'prosperous, just, stable' is not available to MANY here. To ignore it is to jeopardize all of us.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)the vast prosperity we currently achieve but distribute increasingly poorly?
I notice so often a blind faith in those who imagine they can just replace politicians with histories and slot in unknowns who promise change and have improvement. Please take a good look at who Manning's right-wing populist counterparts have put in office -- or more accurately, who those harnessing their negative, ignorant frustrations have.
You won't like this, but people eager to destroy our current Democratic leadership need to ask themselves: When has a good, solid achiever for the people risen from behind these dark, frightening messages? Never. Some really bad ones have, though.
They should also take a good look at our current representatives to determine who should be retained, but that's no doubt never going to be possible for many who determined to see only bad.
Fact is, extremism is antithetical to both competence and to democracy itself, which must have cooperation among peoples of differing viewpoints to exist. Extremists can only thrive in our suburbs when they don't thrive in government.
elleng
(130,865 posts)'Dark, frightening messages' don't do it, nor does 'extremism,' but rational messages from those experienced, for example Governor O'Malley, can, and must get attention.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)... for pointing out the blind folly of those who follow her or who think Cardin "needs to be primaried" (he doesn't.)
louis c
(8,652 posts)Eliot Rosewater
(31,109 posts)happening
I think our country is gone, my friend, for real
herding cats
(19,563 posts)It was all theatrics and zero substance. What could possibly be right about that to any person of thought? It was meant to prey on emotional reactions, not rational thought. It was an insult.
Cha
(297,138 posts)Senator Ben Cardin with her Fearmongering ad, worthy of the republicons and/or Russian propaganda.
"..more of the same.." where have I heard that lazy crap before?
She'd still be in prison if Obama hadn't commuted her sentence.
Senator Ben Cardin:
JANUARY 10, 2018
U.S. Senator Ben Cardin Releases Report Detailing Two Decades of Putins Attacks on Democracy, Calling for Policy Changes to Counter Kremlin Threat Ahead of 2018, 2020 Elections
https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=10102116
Eliot Rosewater
(31,109 posts)Cha
(297,138 posts)Mahalo, ER
SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)I appreciate you setting the record straight.
Cha
(297,138 posts)and I appreciate you!
I'm a bit of Sun seeker, myself.
samnsara
(17,616 posts)herding cats
(19,563 posts)It was possibly the most shallow political ad Ive ever had the displeasure of viewing.
What in the world is she thinking?
Thin gruel 😜
FreepFryer
(7,077 posts)Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)pnwmom
(108,976 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)Committee. If Republicans lose control of the senate, as is believed likely, in 2018, Cardin will be chair of that very important committee.
For different reasons, the Russians, the GOP, and our hostile rule-or-ruin faction are all focused on taking out effective Democrats.
Cha
(297,138 posts)Shine the Light!
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)mcar
(42,301 posts)Russians are still interfering and seemingly have willing accomplices.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)seats they might take. If they lose them to the right, well, step one to a better world still achieved.
This is the kind of thinking that caused me to equate it with dangerous dysfunction over 40 years ago. New ideal-bleating generations, same conservative-benefiting behaviors.
Cha
(297,138 posts)what I suspected all along.
Thanks Blue_Tires
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
crazylikafox
(2,754 posts)peggysue2
(10,828 posts)When I first heard Ms Manning was planning to primary, I suggested she call up her BF Assange, see if there was an opening at Wikileaks HQ. Though Assange appears to be a wee bit pinched at the moment. Poor baby!
joshcryer
(62,269 posts)The patsies will be those who fall for the conspiracies when she inevitably loses.
mcar
(42,301 posts)Cardin is a good senator and solid Dem. SMDH.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,232 posts)herding cats
(19,563 posts)Last edited Mon Jan 15, 2018, 05:28 AM - Edit history (1)
Seriously, do you think thats it? I mean, really is that a thing people are saying?
Im not sure, but I admit its a terrible premise shes apparently mounting for a campaign. Most voters will be insulted by her ad, not inspired. Its an insult on its face for the voters in the state shes running in. All politics are local isnt a fabled unicorn, its true.
Shes toast out of the starting gates. This is asinine and uncalled for in that state. Its basically one of the stupidest political moves Ive seen in decades. Which is saying a lot.
yardwork
(61,588 posts)happy feet
(869 posts)ehrnst
(32,640 posts)Eliot Rosewater
(31,109 posts)we are in very deep shit.
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)R B Garr
(16,950 posts)I saw your other posts about Glenn's concern. This can't be called out enough.
Cha
(297,138 posts)against Senator Cardin who does "GOT THIS".
So, who's funding her to Challenge a popular sitting Democratic Senator?
DURHAM D
(32,609 posts)Cha
(297,138 posts)that's who's funding her?
Link to tweet
https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=10100267
This makes me sick.
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)She belongs in jail. She is fortunate that Obama had compassion for her predicament. And no w she's trying to fuck a good Democrat. She can go straight to hell.
The Republicans have four criminals running and now we have our own convicted felon.
I hope the FBI has opened a file on her funding sources.
handmade34
(22,756 posts)her funding source is probably non-existent... I don't dislike Chelsea Manning, just think the ad is low budget
janterry
(4,429 posts)The push to sound powerful - sounded forced and.....kind of lame.
It might play well to her online followers, but not to the mainstream voters she needs to impress
Cha
(297,138 posts)RKP5637
(67,104 posts)quite right. Also, I did not like the ad, or that she's running against a good dem.
Calista241
(5,586 posts)Didn't Obama just commute her sentence? Which means she'd still have a felony conviction on her record.
janterry
(4,429 posts)but she can run
I don't think she could pass a security clearance at the WH either. SO, there's that
Cha
(297,138 posts)joshcryer
(62,269 posts)There is literally nothing other than age and citizenship that bar you from political office. You can run from inside a prison.
https://www.factcheck.org/2008/11/felons-in-office/
There are 4 convicted felons currently running on the Republican side: https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/joe-arpaio-2018-election_us_5a563b5ae4b03417e8743168
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)ehrnst
(32,640 posts)Tipperary
(6,930 posts)OKNancy
(41,832 posts)When she was Bradley, she punched her female supervisor.
She also as Bradley threatened the same woman to out her as gay.
This woman told me in person, "I am really surprised if he would get surgery to remove his penis. He loved it, liked to take it out and wave his dick at me all the time and say crude stuff"
Anyone who puts Manning on some kind of pedestal as a hero is mistaken. All she wants is attention.
janterry
(4,429 posts)but my sense of her was that she had some 'borderline personality features'
jmho here -
JI7
(89,247 posts)joshcryer
(62,269 posts)...and Bergdahl didn't get prison time.
I am glad Obama gave Manning her freedom, but I think she was conned into doing what she did by Assange personally.
JI7
(89,247 posts)irisblue
(32,967 posts)OKNancy
(41,832 posts)The person who was involved in these incidents... I had breakfast with her yesterday. With her and my daughter. They are engaged.
I'm not mentioning her name because she got death threats because she testified in the trial against Manning. She can't even use her real name on Facebook.
irisblue
(32,967 posts)I know/knew very little about her, except for the general public information. I had heard (pretty sure it was the New Yorker Radio Hour in late October) a long interview with her, then an analysis of her actions& behaviors. The specific mention of narcissism in her personality and how that impacted her military career.
Appreciate the conformation.
janterry
(4,429 posts)that she seems borderline, to me
Anny61
(100 posts)Drahthaardogs
(6,843 posts)This man HELPED give us Trump and slandered Hillary.
Why the fuck is Manning supported here on DU?
janterry
(4,429 posts)n/t
Drahthaardogs
(6,843 posts)She's a traitor and a Russian aider and abaitor. Assange played her, but she is a Democratic pariah, sorry
Calista241
(5,586 posts)His record is more of an anarchist really than anything else.
Drahthaardogs
(6,843 posts)And I despise him. Inhold Manning in slightly higher regard only because she is dumb and easily manipulated.
George II
(67,782 posts)Drahthaardogs
(6,843 posts)Everyone was applauding them at the time. Funny how they all took it sought refuge in Russia isn't it?
More Putin bullshit.
.99center
(1,237 posts)I don't know how to put this delicately...
This fucking ad looks like the same shit being produced by the Kremlin to divide Americans.
Donation page for Sen. Ben Cardin.
https://secure.actblue.com/contribute/page/ben_cardin
Demsrule86
(68,543 posts)That would have been awesome. Instead, we have to waste time and resources on a primary. Very disappointing.
janterry
(4,429 posts)I think she should have run as an independent. Or Green Party. She's backed by them, I would think
Demsrule86
(68,543 posts)for a Democratic held seat. But her involvement with Greenwald and Assange...indicates a Kremliin connection.
Cha
(297,138 posts)in the ad is all republicon shite.
manning looks really disingenuous primarying a sitting Democratic President who is doing his job well.
Link to tweet
Demsrule86
(68,543 posts)PragmaticDem
(320 posts)Cha
(297,138 posts)PragmaticDem
(320 posts)RKP5637
(67,104 posts)Firebrand Gary
(5,044 posts)I'm a fan of Cardin and I hope he wins, Chelsea is doing a service to the party and movement so long as she does not tear down Cardin in the process.
Cha
(297,138 posts)honorable, Gary.
Link to tweet
She's primarying a sitting Democratic Senator who is doing a good job.. Senator Ben Cardin has Got This.
yurbud
(39,405 posts)not that they are as capitalist as us, it's kind of a pathetic charge.
Even if Russia is trying to influence our election, an honest assessment of our foreign policy toward Russia since the end of the Cold War might reveal how to reduce tensions without fear-mongering and escalating tensions with our only nuclear peer in the world.
Democrats need to be careful with this Russia-baiting for another reason too. It is based on the premise that progressives and minorities have nowhere to go since the Republican Party is more corrupt, openly racist, and now insane.
But if Democratic voters see the Democratic Party as pushing for war with Russia or China, the Democrats will start to lose a lot more voters to third parties or even more likely, see new SECOND party replace them and/or Republicans.
janterry
(4,429 posts)but my armchair assessment is that she can't pull this off with enough equanimity, given who she is - at this point in her life (to positively represent the trans community throughout the primary).
Of course, she thinks so......so, we'll see.
mcar
(42,301 posts)I applaud any and all Democratic women running for office....
But not to primary a sitting Dem. Do you realize how tight the Senate board is? We cannot afford to waste resources on a primary fight.
Proud Liberal Dem
(24,406 posts)I'm not familiar with Cardin's record but of all of the Dems that I've heard should be primaried for something they said or voted for, his has never been on any list AFAIK. Sort of doubt that this primary challenge is going anywhere. Is there a Republican-held House seat and/or State Legisture seat she can try to snag instead? Jumping into a US Senate race as a political neophyte (and a controversial person at that) seems sort of doomed to failure. I mean, she has the right to run and all, but still.......
mcar
(42,301 posts)She could run against an R for state leg or something like that.
louis c
(8,652 posts)Because Chelsea is "trans", she can work as a Kremlin stooge and get a pass here?
She's an asshole, regardless of her gender or sexual preference.
David__77
(23,369 posts)Is she not?
And, sexual preference? Whats that?
louis c
(8,652 posts)Stop splitting hairs. Manning is a traitor who is a comrade of the person (Assange) responsible for putting Trump into office.
Fuck Chelsea Manning. She should still be in jail.
rusty fender
(3,428 posts)"She's a trans woman running for the US Senate! Let's applaud that!" What if it's Caitlyn Jenner running, Einstein
cwydro
(51,308 posts)Yeah sure.
pnwmom
(108,976 posts)I'm not going to applaud her for helping the Republicans tear down a good Democrat.
Firebrand Gary
(5,044 posts)Drahthaardogs
(6,843 posts)Saying we should support her because of her sexual reassignment surgery is ridiculous.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)So what?
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)ehrnst
(32,640 posts)crazycatlady
(4,492 posts)If Caitlyn Jenner were to run for US-Senate I wouldn't support her either.
tammywammy
(26,582 posts)How well is that going to go over with the multitude of people in Maryland that currently hold a security clearance? I agreed with her sentence being commuted, but for what she did - fuck her. She downloaded everything she could get her hands on and without any discrimination released it. There are avenues for people in her position to whistleblow. Thats not what she did. Not to mention her assaulting her superior officer.
Cha
(297,138 posts)And, this came up..
"In many states, Manning would be unable to vote or run for elected office after being convicted of a felony, but Maryland passed a law last year that allows felons to participate in elections. During his career in the senate, Cardin has frequently advocated restoring voting rights to felons.
https://www.google.com/search?source=hp&ei=gvJbWtiOLo7SjwPk8LuIDg&q=can+convicted+felons+run+for+office&oq=can+convicted+felons+run+for+office&gs_l=psy-ab.3..0i131k1j0i22i30k1l9.875.10048.0.10538.39.27.1.11.11.0.299.3717.0j17j4.21.0....0...1c.1.64.psy-ab..6.33.4033...0j0i10k1j33i21k1j33i160k1.0.qobpuIQ5n5Q
tammywammy
(26,582 posts)States could limit for state legislatures, but theres nothing in the Constitution to prevent her for running for federal office.
I just think her advocacy for transgender rights or prison reform could be a lot more beneficial than a pie in the sky political campaign.
jmowreader
(50,553 posts)You're telling me she actually believes anyone who released roughly 700,000 classified documents to the civilian world is going to appeal to an electorate as full of government employees as Maryland is?
madinmaryland
(64,931 posts)She just needs to STFU and do something productive in her life.
calguy
(5,305 posts)As a woman* she* is still a treasonous weasel.
Jim Lane
(11,175 posts)If you had chosen to write, "As a woman she is still a treasonous weasel," that would be one thing.
But putting asterisks after "woman" and "she" is nothing but transphobia.
People can exchange differing opinions about Manning's actions without descending to such smears.
calguy
(5,305 posts)LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)Two plus two equals yellow is a sincere opinion as well, despite being uniformed.
It would take a creative imagination to pretend though, that that opinion is not simple petulance and in any way relevant to the OP.
Jim Lane
(11,175 posts)Here's an example: Utah's 4th congressional district is represented by an anti-choice, anti-ACA Republican who wants to cut spending on things like Medicaid and school lunches. It's easy to express the sincere opinion that those are reprehensible positions. But if someone wanted to express that sincere opinion by calling Representative Love the c-word (because she's a woman) or the n-word (because she's black), would that be OK with you?
It wouldn't be OK with me. I hope she loses her next election but my opposition to her would not be an excuse for sexism or racism.
Drahthaardogs
(6,843 posts)Because she is trans.
Her gender identity has NOTHING to do with any of this.
Jim Lane
(11,175 posts)You were able to express your disapproval of Chelsea Manning by calling her a "little traitor" -- without resorting to transphobia.
You write, "Her gender identity has NOTHING to do with any of this." I'd say it has nothing to do with her revelations of government secrets, and little to do with her candidacy for office. But it has a lot to do with the specific post I answered, which pretty clearly disparaged her gender identity.
Drahthaardogs
(6,843 posts)Just pointing out that the posters who say we should support and celebrate her candidacy because she IS trans is every bit as disgusting.
I would not vote for her for dog catcher. She is NO Democrat. She helped Trump attack Hillary with Assange.
Jim Lane
(11,175 posts)One can be glad that it's become more politically feasible for a trans person to run, and yet not support a particular trans candidate.
I wrote that her trans status has "little to do with her candidacy for office" (emphasis added). Other things being equal, it's good to have barriers broken. There was quite a bit of celebration of this concept here when Hillary Clinton became the first woman nominated by a major party.
Of course, in the real world, other things are never equal. If the general election had been Carly Fiorina versus Chafee, O'Malley, Sanders, or Webb, then Hillary and almost all her supporters would have backed the man on the Democratic ticket instead of the woman on the Republican ticket.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)Because trans?
Jim Lane
(11,175 posts)I wouldn't support a run by Tim Scott, either. He and Jenner are both right-wingers.
But I wouldn't approve of someone opposing Scott with a racial slur.
This is just more of the all-or-nothing thinking that's growing on DU. In this view, there is Good and there is Evil -- nothing else. Any negative comment about Evil (such as a transphobic slur) is acceptable because, after all, Evil is Evil. The corollary is that anyone who calls out such a slur must therefore support the Evil candidate in all respects.
And to think, we used to laugh at Republicans for not understanding nuance.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)I think that is a rather implausable thing to be scolding people here for doing.
To accuse people here for homophobia for not wanting Manning to run is ridiculous.
I think the nuance here is going way, way over your head.
Jim Lane
(11,175 posts)Enough. You're happy with someone calling Chelsea Manning a "woman*" instead of just a woman, and I'm tired of all these straw-man arguments. Have a nice day.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)The nuance is about 50 feet above your head, and that is frustrating for you.
Have a nice day.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)Because of asterisks?
Really?
Jim Lane
(11,175 posts)The asterisks were intended to express an opinion about Manning (taking "expressing my sincere option" in #97 to be a typo for "expressing my sincere opinion" ).
If there was some other hidden meaning that I'm too dim-witted to see, you'll have to spell it out for me. On the current state of the subthread, I take calguy's sincere opinion to be that there's something questionable or disreputable about Manning's gender -- that Chelsea Manning is not a real woman, or some such.
demmiblue
(36,841 posts)Some on DU accept that sort of bigotry when it serves their purpose.
Same thing happened regarding Bernie Sanders and anti-Semitic comments.
JonLP24
(29,322 posts)I don't care for her Senate run but she did the right thing exposing US war crimes. She made a mistake releasing it to Wikileaks but all this Russia shit (who released it to third parties like DCLeaks for "plausible deniability" of their involvement) wasn't known then and people like Daniel Ellsberg defended her. Most of the shit in their reflects badly on Bush anyways.
If she is treasonous then lock my ass up. Not before Trump is locked up BTW they dropped the ball on the collusion thing because the FBI field office in New York hated Hillary Clinton.
*trashing thread*
shanny
(6,709 posts)Cha
(297,138 posts)shanny
(6,709 posts)is the assumption by some here...that the Russians and their stooges are wholly responsible for Hillary's loss. That mindset can bite us all in the ass.
Cha
(297,138 posts)Chelsea Manning and your hyperbolic strawman.. that's not working, either.
shanny
(6,709 posts)R B Garr
(16,950 posts)Who are the stooges? Names please. I bet I know some...
And it's not a "mindset". There is a FBI investigation into how they and the "stooges" undermined our election. Those are the facts. It's revealing you call it a mindset, as if we can't believe facts that don't feed a prescribed narrative.
Me.
(35,454 posts)But the congressional coalition that has come together around the Magnitsky Act (first introduced by Senator Benjamin Cardin of Maryland, a Democrat
https://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/the-magnitsky-case
Cha
(297,138 posts)https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnitsky_Act
Did not know that, Me.. and as your link quoted..
But the congressional coalition that has come together around the Magnitsky Act (first introduced by Senator Benjamin Cardin of Maryland, a Democrat
https://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/the-magnitsky-case
Mahalo!
Me.
(35,454 posts)After the death in prison in 2009 of Sergei Magnitsky, a Russian lawyer and auditor who had represented his company and conducted an investigation into massive tax fraud related to it, Browder lobbied for Congress to pass the "Magnitsky Act", a law to punish Russian human rights violators, which was signed into law in 2012 by President Barack Obama.[3][4] In 2013, Browder was tried in absentia in Russia for tax fraud, jointly in a posthumous prosecution of Magnitsky. He was convicted and sentenced to nine years in prison. Interpol rejected Russian requests to arrest Browder, saying the case was political. In 2014, the European Parliament voted for sanctions against 30 Russians believed complicit in the Magnitsky case; this was the first time it had taken such action.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Browder
And that particular act which is driving Putin crazy, has been the focus of trying to get it repealed because the restrictions are very punitive and restricting to him and the Russian economy.
Cha
(297,138 posts)And, Many Thanks to Senator Ben Cardin and President Obama for signing it. Hopefully it doesn't get repealed.
And, hopefully Senator Cardin Runs again.. I just read that he hasn't said yet but he has $32 Million in his campaign chest.
Me.
(35,454 posts)the rEsident didn't like it, but had no choice but to sign. Yes Senator Cardin is a keeper, wish he was mine. As for MAnning, I find it 'ironic', that she 'chose' to challenge this senator. I'm one of those who thinks there's more to this story than is currently known or obvious.
Any time Cha.....
Cha
(297,138 posts)googled to see who's paying for the ad and who created it.. but nothing YET.
Me
Voltaire2
(13,009 posts)Cha
(297,138 posts)ehrnst
(32,640 posts)The Polack MSgt
(13,186 posts)She assaulted her supervising Specialist - Punched her in the face and had to be physically restrained.
She downloaded classified items and shopped them around for the best offer - Sending them to Assange only because mainline news organizations would not give her what she wanted.
Fuck that scum bag.
Also of note, that helicopter gun sight video was not a "War Crime" at all. It was a mistake, it was tragic but it was by the book.
Cha
(297,138 posts)what really happened, The Polack MSgt
shanny
(6,709 posts)May 2010 Chelsea Manning is arrested in Iraq for disclosing information to Wikileaks that was ultimately published by The New York Times, The Guardian, and Der Spiegel. The information, largely comprised of military and diplomatic documents, included evidence of civilian deaths in Iraq and Afghanistan, U.S. attempts to cover up the CIA torture program, and other matters of public interest.
April 2011 After being held for almost a year in solitary confinement in Kuwait and Quantico, Chelsea is transferred to a medium-security military prison in Kansas.... She had been regularly stripped naked, subjected to prolonged isolated confinement and sleep deprivation, deprived of any meaningful opportunity to exercise, and stripped of her reading glasses so she could not read. Almost 300 academics, most of them legal scholars, sign a letter objecting to her treatment.
March 2012 The United Nations Special Rapporteur on Torture Juan Mendez formally rules that the U.S. governments treatment of Chelsea was cruel, inhuman, and degrading.
June 2013 Chelseas court martial trial begins. She is initially charged with aiding the enemy, despite the fact that the government never claimed she directly provided military adversaries with information. The charge is akin to treason and punishable by death.
July 2013 Chelsea is convicted of 17 of the 22 charges against her but acquitted of aiding the enemy. The following month, she is sentenced to 35 years in prison. When a soldier who shared information with the press and public is punished far more harshly than others who tortured prisoners and killed civilians, something is seriously wrong with our justice system, the ACLU says
my bold. you gotta a problem with any of the above, take it up with the ACLU https://www.aclu.org/blog/free-speech/employee-speech-and-whistleblowers/chelsea-manning-case-timeline
struggle4progress
(118,278 posts)Manning seems to possess a certain technical intelligence but seems to lack the interpersonal experience and sociological curiosity needed to develop organizing skill and political wisdom
pnwmom
(108,976 posts)and most of us don't want to be. She's acting like a character in an action movie, not a U.S. Senator.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Like the PAC ad for Trump about China in the last election.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)Except she's dressed like a black bloc participant.
Where the left goes so far that it meets up with the far right...
struggle4progress
(118,278 posts)pnwmom
(108,976 posts)was darkly threatening.
democratisphere
(17,235 posts)KWR65
(1,098 posts)We have a bone head in the white house and he don't need another one in the Senate.
Gabi Hayes
(28,795 posts)Handler?
Thats what I was thinkin when I first saw this
CH should primary Gillibrand
herding cats
(19,563 posts)Seriously, what the heck was that about?
pnwmom
(108,976 posts)herding cats
(19,563 posts)If so, its pathetic. Does anyone honestly think that will fly in Maryland?! It wont. Its ludicrous to even think it may.
Im sorry, Im still processing all this. Its so bizarre Im having some difficulty.
lapucelle
(18,249 posts)that "both parties are the same".
At 25 seconds in, when Manning says, "We don't need more...", it's former president Barack Obama at the podium delivering the State of the Union.
There's a reason why some people are termed "useful idiots".
Cha
(297,138 posts)she try to smear President Obama with her nasty rnc scare tactics.
The President who commuted her sentence.. she might still be in prison if not for President Obama.
Mahalo
janterry
(4,429 posts)wow. He commuted her sentence.
I keep thinking borderline.
I still do. I guess we'll see how she functioned over the course of the primary. My guess is that she'll have another crises that we'll read about........
uponit7771
(90,335 posts)betsuni
(25,462 posts)janterry
(4,429 posts)who doesn't know her at all and she said
Is that what it is supposed to look like? It looks like a movie.
So, perhaps you have it right
ansible
(1,718 posts)Why the hell did Obama commute the sentence?
George II
(67,782 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)The only time either party was referenced it was a shot at Democrats.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Ben Cardin
U.S. Senator Ben Cardin Releases Report Detailing Two Decades of Putins Attacks on Democracy, Calling for Policy Changes to Counter Kremlin Threat Ahead of 2018, 2020 Elections
WASHINGTON A Senate Foreign Relations Committee Democratic staff report released Wednesday and commissioned by U.S. Senator Ben Cardin (D-Md.), the Committees ranking member, details Russian president Vladimir Putins nearly two decades-long assault on democratic institutions, universal values, and the rule of law across Europe and in his own country. The report comes one year after Senator Cardin introduced the Counteracting Russian Hostilities Act of 2017, which served as the basis for the sanctions package signed into law last August, and makes a series of recommendations to adequately bolster U.S. and European defenses and counter the growing Kremlin threat to democratic institutions.
Putins Asymmetrical Assault on Democracy in Russia and Europe: Implications for U.S. National Security, finds that President Trumps refusal to publicly acknowledge the threat posed by the Russian government has hampered efforts to mobilize our government, strengthen our institutions, and work with our European allies to counter Putins interference in democracies abroad.
Never before in American history has so clear a threat to national security been so clearly ignored by a U.S. president, and without a strong U.S. response, institutions and elections here and throughout Europe will remain vulnerable to the Kremlins aggressive and sophisticated malign influence operations.
As the extent of Russias obvious meddling in the 2016 U.S. election continues to be investigated, it is imperative that the American people better understand the true scope and scale of Putins pattern of undermining democracy in Russia and across Europe. That is why I commissioned this report shortly after the 2016 election, Senator Cardin said. This threat existed long before President Trump took office, and unless he takes action now, it will continue long after his administration. While President Trump stands practically idle, Mr. Putin continues to refine his asymmetric arsenal and look for future opportunities to disrupt governance and erode support for the democratic and international institutions that the United States and Europe have built over the last 70 years.
https://www.cardin.senate.gov/newsroom/press/release/us-senator-ben-cardin-releases-report-detailing-two-decades-of-putins-attacks-on-democracy-calling-for-policy-changes-to-counter-kremlin-threat-ahead-of-2018-2020-elections
The only reference she makes to any political party is a cheap shot at Democrats. I wan't to know who is funding her(not many by looking at that ad). This is ratfucking.
https://www.facebook.com/wegotthisnursing/
Historic NY
(37,449 posts)the entire ad looks like a clipped together you tube.
Guess her actual home state Ok isn't so ok with her on a the ballot there.
cilla4progress
(24,726 posts)quite transparently. Consider the geopolitics and there is no doubt.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)She should have stopped at "no signal." A fresh Democratic voice this isn't.
Cha
(297,138 posts)that should work.
It does kinda seem like a Russian propaganda or an rnc video.
ucr
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)I think we've seen this movie before.
aloha Cha!
Cha
(297,138 posts)oasis
(49,376 posts)Cha
(297,138 posts)Mahalo After President Obama commuted her sentence, too.
I ask google who paid for her rnc/Russian worthy Fearmongering ad but no answer YET.
oasis
(49,376 posts)It's happening much too often, and at every level.
Aloha Cha.
yurbud
(39,405 posts)It stinks of desperation and makes people suspect you want to avoid talking about real issues.
I checked Cardin's record and he's somewhat progressive on a lot of issues, so there is a basis to defend him via non-histrionic methods.
louis c
(8,652 posts)She's connected to Assange, a Russian ally who helped illegally hand the US election to Donald Trump.
Fuck Chelsea Manning. She's an asshole traitor to her country.
This is part of the Russian playbook that fucked us in 2016. Divide Democrats because there's a small percentage of them that can be easily fooled into working against their own self interest.
yurbud
(39,405 posts)than the one she exposed.
To the rest of us, she is a hero.
Russia is one of a handful of countries that isn't completely under the thumb of our bankers.
Our government was trying to break them the way we did Iraq and are trying to do off and on to Iran.
Russia effectively countered our moves in Syria, and did just enough in Ukraine to counter the coup by retaining Crimea that it left egg on the faces of the neocons who engineered it.
Democrats should be ashamed of themselves for carrying water for the assholes who cost us trillions of dollars and thousands of our troops lives, and cost the Iraqis a million lives lives.
And that's not even touching the regime changes in the Middle East under Obama that turned Libya into a failed state overrun by mercenaries and terrorists, and tried to do the same to Syria.
The party could implode if you keep going on a suicide mission for Wall St.
louis c
(8,652 posts)You are judged by the company you keep.
She may be a hero to you, but Chelsea Manning is a no good, traitorous piece of shit to me.
yurbud
(39,405 posts)guilt by association isn't going to scare people off.
I was unhappy with some of Assange's statements and timing, but he has done valuable work at other times that has helped democracy around the world.
The only people who are completely pissed off at him are elites whose secrets he has exposed that make it difficult to conduct business as usual with the rest of us in the dark.
louis c
(8,652 posts)This is about the people who conspired to steal our Democracy and help elect a monster to the highest office in the land.
If this piece of shit Kremlin stooge is a candidate you admire, than that's your choice.
But don't be offended that others will assess your political character by that choice.
yurbud
(39,405 posts)can survive this half-assed attempt at McCarthyism.
louis c
(8,652 posts)...is responsible for Trump being in office.
Chelsea Manning assisted in electing Trump by using false stories and internet lies to discourage anti-Trump voters for voting for the only alternative.
I love Obama, but I disagree with his letting this no good piece of shit out of jail. She should have rotted in jail, now she can rot in hell.
Dawson Leery
(19,348 posts)Any friend of Putin/Assange is NOT a friend of the free world.
Stinky The Clown
(67,788 posts). . . . with that US enemy living there.
Fuck you, Chelsea.
ebbie15644
(1,214 posts)R B Garr
(16,950 posts)Embarrassingly bad.
janterry
(4,429 posts)I mean, if it were me and the ad were about me?? OMG we'd redo the voice over (at the very least). Doesn't she have friends who can sort of hit her on the head and say: nope. you don't got this.
R B Garr
(16,950 posts)She sounds and acts like a bad Hitchcock wannabe or some Dr. Strangelove character, just absolutely freaky presentation. Gads!
grossproffit
(5,591 posts)janterry
(4,429 posts)I wonder if they will raise money for her campaign?