Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

queentonic

(243 posts)
Tue Jan 9, 2018, 06:37 AM Jan 2018

A Question

Any chance the Trumpster will fire Mueller when Mueller shows up to interrogate him? It would be the Trumpster's style to make it a reality TV moment wouldn't you think? Especially if the meeting is video taped. Can't you see him doing the Apprentice thing "You're Fired" throwing red meat to his base?

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A Question (Original Post) queentonic Jan 2018 OP
I hadnt considered that, but his fans would love it. Arkansas Granny Jan 2018 #1
Another question TexasProgresive Jan 2018 #2

TexasProgresive

(12,157 posts)
2. Another question
Tue Jan 9, 2018, 07:58 AM
Jan 2018

As Robert Mueller works for Deputy Attorney General Rod J. Rosenstein and not tRump does tRump have the authority to fire him? My understanding is that the Justice department operates independent of the executive. Because Session's recused himself it falls on Rosenstein to oversee the . tRump can only fire Sessions but not Rosenstein and certainly not Mueller. The following snip is from a source that I don't like, "The Washington Times," but it gives a pretty good explanation of the situation. It is from November of 2016.


Q&A: Why Justice Dept. operates independent of White House
By BY ERIC TUCKER - Associated Press - Wednesday, November 23, 2016
White House officials and Justice Department lawyers aren’t even meant to talk with each other about ongoing criminal investigations or civil enforcement actions, though there is leeway granted for matters of national security, including terrorism.

A 2007 Justice Department memorandum says that though it’s important for the Justice Department and White House to communicate freely on many matters, the department will advise the White House of criminal or civil-enforcement matters “only where it is important for the performance of the president’s duties and where appropriate from a law enforcement perspective.”

“This limitation recognizes the president’s ability to perform his constitutional obligation to ‘take care that the laws be faithfully executed’ while ensuring that there is public confidence that the laws of the United States are administered and enforced in an impartial manner,” the memo states.


And:

Alabama Sen. Jeff Sessions, Trump’s pick for attorney general, has expressed an appreciation for the independent nature of the job. He asked Loretta Lynch during her confirmation hearing as attorney general last year if she was “able and willing to tell the president of the United States no if he asks permission or a legal opinion that supports an action you believe is wrong?” Lynch said she was.

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/nov/23/qa-why-justice-dept-operates-free-of-white-house-s/
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A Question