HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » kpete » Journal
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 1320 Next »

kpete

Profile Information

Member since: Fri Sep 17, 2004, 03:59 PM
Number of posts: 46,319

Journal Archives

American exceptionalism

?1432832515

Dang you, Obama!

?w=714&h=467

Pierce on Sanders and the completely expected hippy bombing.

Shoot me.
Things in Politico That Make Me Want to Guzzle Antifreeze, Part the Infinity
In which an ambitious young man is betrayed by his editors.


BY CHARLES P. PIERCE


(where are the hippies and/or dreadlocks?)

Just shoot me right now.

These weren't your everyday Americans who came out to support Bernie Sanders on Tuesday. The self-described democratic socialist kicked off his long-shot run for the White House in his adopted hometown of Burlington, a lakeside city full of characters who might not have passed the pre-selection process for Hillary Clinton's tour of round tables...In the afternoon, a "people's assembly" of hundreds of Sanders supporters gathered in City Hall Park, where dreadlocked guitarists played in the morning and patrons browsed at the nearby Hempest, which advertises itself as the largest organic hemp product store in the world.


I don't know Jonathan Topaz, nor do I know much about his work. His bio is that of a smart, shining young man out of the Ivy League with a pretty cool name, but this passage should be a career-killer. What, pray tell, young Jonathan, do "everyday Americans" look like? Perhaps like the Duggars of Springdale, Arkansas? The hayshaking Bible-banging cultists whom I saw gather in Iowa earlier this spring? Sheldon Adelson? But Jonathan should not bear the punishment alone. Every editor, sub-editor, and researcher who read this and didn't say, "Holy hell, this is some cheap bullshit right here. It's beneath even our standards!" also should find their careers taking on water.



http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/news/a35253/politico-drops-the-hippie-bomb/

We will NOT forget.

The Arc of the Moral Universe... Is Twisted
by David Michael Green

The story that the Right tells itself – in order to save itself from itself – is that it was all one big innocent cock-up, for which they had no responsibility:

.........................

You’d have to forget that Bush and his cronies confided to family friend and author Mickey Herskowitz in 1999 that they were already planning on invading Iraq, in part because of the political capital they believed a quick and decisive victory would generate for use in ramming through their domestic agenda. Apparently they had been mightily impressed by the political benefits accrued to Margaret Thatcher after winning the Falklands War and sought the same for themselves. Herskowitz had tapes of Bush saying these things, since the author was ghost-writing Bush’s pre-campaign obligatory autobiography. Until he wasn’t. When smarter heads caught wind of what W. had confessed, a campaign operative showed up at Herskowitz’s house one morning at 7:00 AM to confiscate the tapes and files.

You’d also have to forget that Treasury Secretary Paul O’Neill confirmed that invading Iraq was being discussed at cabinet meetings from the very beginning of the Bush administration, well before 9/11, and that in these deliberations it was not a matter of if, but when, the administration would launch a war.

You’d have to omit Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld’s dictated instructions to an aide on 9/11 to “go massive - sweep it all up, things related and not” in which he sought to justify the administration’s full empire-building agenda using the events of that day as cover.

You’d need to forget how yet another insider – terrorism czar Richard Clarke – confirmed that Bush pulled him aside just days after 9/11, poked him in the chest, and ordered him to find a link between the al Qaeda attack and Saddam Hussein.

And one would also need forget, as well, the admission by Paul Wolfowitz – often labeled the architect of the Iraq war, and thus the ultimate insider – that the whole WMD campaign was purely for “bureaucratic” purposes. That is, that within the administration they all had their own reasons for wanting a war against a country not only not harming the US but not even threatening it, but in order to have any hope of selling such an obvious stinker they all had to get on the same page, and that page was WMD. Never mind that it was a Whole Mass of Deceit and they not only knew it, they built it.

More things to forget:
http://www.commondreams.org/views/2015/05/27/arc-moral-universe-twisted

JK Rowling Smacks Down Westboro Baptist Church in One Tweet

WBCSays ‏@WBCsigns 19h19 hours ago
So @jk_rowling wants Dumbledore & Gandalf to marry in Ireland; if it happens, WBC will picket! #NotBanned @pinknews pic.twitter.com/zY7hT09Nv4




https://twitter.com/WBCsigns/status/603255345692160000

J.K. RowlingVerified account
‏@jk_rowling
.@WBCsigns Alas, the sheer awesomeness of such a union in such a place would blow your tiny bigoted minds out of your thick sloping skulls.


https://twitter.com/jk_rowling/status/603307065054990336

Jon Stewart calls Rand Paul out on ‘religious freedom': "Don’t Christians sell cakes to adulterers?"

Daily Show host Jon Stewart pushed back against Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul on Tuesday for trying to frame opposition to same-sex marriages — and their wedding cakes — as a “religious freedom” issue.

“It seems like gay marriage looms a lot larger in the minds of certain conservatives than it does in the Bible,” Stewart told the GOP presidential candidate. “And the only thing I would say is, don’t they sell cakes to sinners all the time, adulterers?”

Stewart pointed out that if Paul were to enter a bakery looking for a wedding cake, the staff was not likely to ask him if he broke any commandments.

“It feels disingenuous,” he told the senator.


More plus video:
http://www.rawstory.com/2015/05/jon-stewart-calls-rand-paul-out-on-religious-freedom-dont-christians-sell-cakes-to-adulterers/

Breaking News: Texas Halts Plans To Secede From America

:large

Shocking photo CPD didn't want you to see: 2 white cops holding black man like hunting trophy

Shocking photo CPD didn't want you to see: 2 white cops holding black man like hunting trophy




https://twitter.com/kimjnews/status/603443983625416704/photo/1

http://chicago.suntimes.com/crime/7/71/587596/judge-wont-seal-photo-cpd-cops-posing-african-american-man-antlers

MORE HERE:
https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2015/05/27/chicago-police-put-antlers-black-man-posed-pictures/

Death penalty for thee but not for me

Jim Bob Duggar (circa 2002): Those Who Commit Incest Should Receive the Death Penalty

This was from Jim Bob's 2002 Senate campaign website. He was running for office as his son Josh was molesting his sisters in their sleep:



http://linkis.com/www.patheos.com/blog/7crp2

It's long since time the press gave Bernie Sanders the respect he deserves.

In democracy, the voters decide who wins a presidential election. But the media has great influence over which candidates get serious consideration. So when it comes to Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont and the 2016 race, it's clear that he's getting a raw deal. It's long since time the press gave him the respect he deserves.

Jay Rosen, the New York University journalism professor, has a useful concept for describing the ideology of journalists: nested spheres of legitimacy. These have to do with the way ideas are presented in a piece of journalism. The idea of women's suffrage is presented as non-controversial, thus placed in the "sphere of consensus." The idea that aliens control the government, say, is presented as nuts, thus placed in the "sphere of deviance." The latter ideas are openly presented in the news as illegitimate or insane, if they are not ignored altogether.

What ideas go in which sphere is an inescapable part of journalism, though most reporters don't acknowledge they're doing it. And at the moment, the idea of Bernie Sanders as a candidate is getting placed in the deviant sphere

........

The constant presumptions about the electoral viability of some candidate amounts to an attempt to influence the outcome of the election, whether it's intentional or not. That might be a justifiable enterprise with someone like former Rep. Ron Paul, who has an extensive history of racism, homophobia, and anti-Semitism. But while Sanders has odd hair, and can be grouchy at times, he's not some random nutter from the Prohibition Party.


the rest:
http://theweek.com/articles/556667/bernie-sanders-totally-legitimate-presidential-candidate-time-press-started-treating-likehttp://theweek.com/articles/556667/bernie-sanders-totally-legitimate-presidential-candidate-time-press-started-treating-like
Go to Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 1320 Next »