HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » freshwest » Journal
Introducing Discussionist: A new forum by the creators of DU
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 309 Next »


Profile Information

Member since: Fri Dec 10, 2010, 10:36 PM
Number of posts: 45,592

Journal Archives

Beautiful leopard gif, ralps!

CONTACT the DOJ by these methods:

Contacting the Voting Section


Voting Section
Civil Rights Division
U.S. Department of Justice
Room 7254 - NWB
950 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W.
Washington, DC 20530


You may call the Voting Section at:

(202) 307-2767

or toll-free at:

(800) 253-3931.


You can send a fax to the Voting Section at:

(202) 307-3961.


You can send a complaint form to the Voting Section at:



You can send an email to:


More at link:


Perhaps send the Politicusua link:

Militia Group Plans To Target African-American Democrats At Polling Places In Wisconsin

With the twitter exchange, perhaps it can be tweeted to the DOJ:


This is Jim Crow on steroids and these are domestic terrorists. They have no place or right to abuse public data bases and law enforcement to disenfranchise voters. This group is brownshirt fascism at work. They do not respect any law or any boundaries.

My only concern with posting all of this is that the RWNJs will try to overload the servers at the DOJ. They have done this before with the ACA. But I suspect the DOJ have the technology to find the perpertrators of a cyber attack.

They consider themselves educated. Eugenics employed the now discredited 'science' of phrenology.

The CSA made what they thought were scientific claims of the innate inferiority of blacks and women to participate in government. They said, as conservatives have continued to say, that liberals are insane for opposing God's plan and the Laws of Nature (you know, like Gravity).

Read the following links to see where they came to think this way:

Confederate philosophy, read the dreck (emboldening font mine) and weep


Scratch them on their Libertarian side, and you will find them adoring ancient philosophers from societies that just so happened to be built on the backs of slaves. The same place the CSA, TPs, Constitutional Party, etc. got their brainy talk. It's actually much worse than what the CSA said:

Ancient Greece and Rome were built on slavery and ruled by a leisure class who talked a lot


This is what I learned when I tried to reason online with these goons over the years. They feel very secure in their own version of reality. it works for them, actually. It gives them a rationale for their mistreatment of laborers. And it gives them cover to use terrorism to run people off their land or take their property, as an excuse that enriches them. It's not all what we define as hate. It's greed draped uner a flag and family and God.

When all else fails, they tell you that you should be killed off as a danger to 'their' country. Some CTers ascribe to this way of thinking, too, but use different terms. And one more here:

Okay, I will quit after this



There will be no awakenings, just recycling. The Past is Never Dead:

"It's all now, you see. Yesterday won't be over until tomorrow and tomorrow began ten thousand years ago."

~ William Faulkner

I've practiced this. It makes no sense, but it really works:

"At a certain point the alternative versions of all of this information no longer matters. What does matter is the balance of energy on the inside. Free flow of energy or not... We walk through the world being constantly challenged. At some point we have to realize that what we feel on the inside is creating life outside. We are magnetized and we can decide what we attract. We're more than anything that we were ever taught. It truly is all about frequency."

Sounds like woo, but as I said, I've done it in the past consciously. It was a long process. No, not TheSecret©.

Right now, I am shutting almost everything out of my life. There is a reason, as old as life and death.

So are we...

And besides:

I know the standard meaning, but also...

This is where I've been for a while.

Interesting source material:

Googling takes one back to your source instead of the print ready page:

The Daily Signal: Policy News, Conservative Analysis and Opinion

Conservatives and GOP talking points don't usually play well at DU:


Top stories including the GOP hit piece on Hillary:

6 Takeaways From the Benghazi Panel’s First Hearing on Security Failures

The House special committee investigating the Benghazi terrorist attacks today convened its first public hearing, examining progress in implementing security improvements at U.S. embassies and…

Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., at today's hearing . (Photo: Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call)

Mr. Gowdy has been savaged repeatedly at DU, as he continued his Benghazi obsession. He says he will continue the hearings through 2016 and all the way to 2024 if HRC is elected. And that he intends to impeach both Obama and Biden. So, your source is not fondly regarded here. And he keeps on going after the House decided nothing was wrong:

Trey Gowdy’s Benghazi setback: New humiliation for GOP’s scandal hunter

As the GOP's Benghazi committee schedules its first hearing, another committee finds no evidence of a conspiracy


In case you were at all concerned that the relative lack of Benghazi news of late meant that the issue was finally receding after nearly two years of intensive and fruitless investigation, fear not: in just a few short weeks, Benghazi-mania will live and breathe again. Rep. Trey Gowdy, chair of the House select committee tasked with beating whatever Benghazi bushes and dead horses remain, announced on July 30 that his committee’s first hearings will take place in September. If past is prologue, then Gowdy’s people will likely take advantage of the slow August news cycles and leak a few stripped-of-context tidbits to some bored and easily misled reporters. With the midterms bearing down, you’ll have all the necessary ingredients for yet more obsessive Benghazi “scandal” coverage.

It’s still not clear, though, what exactly anyone hopes to learn from Gowdy’s investigation, given that Benghazi has already been scrutinized several times over by several different congressional committees, all of which concluded that Benghazi was a tragedy, but there was no administration conspiracy, and no cover-up. And the day after Gowdy announced when his first hearings would be held, yet another committee reached the same conclusion.

On July 31, the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence voted in favor of releasing a declassified version of its findings from its investigation into Benghazi. Almost immediately, the top-ranking Democrats on the committee started broadcasting the report’s conclusions. Ranking member Rep. Dutch Ruppersberger released a statement saying:

The report also shows that the process used to develop the talking points was flawed, but that the talking points reflected the conflicting intelligence assessments in the days immediately following the crisis. Finally, the report demonstrates that there was no illegal activity or illegal arms sales occurring at U.S. facilities in Benghazi. And there was absolutely no evidence, in documents or testimony, that the Intelligence Community’s assessments were politically motivated in any way...



The Left’s Political Network, Exposed in One Chart

It quotes RWNJ Ted Cruz, also not beloved at DU:


Did You Know? An Illegal Immigrant Lives in U.S. for 12.7 Years… and Other Interesting Factoids

This is not a Democratic Party position piece:


Bobby Jindal: How the ‘Radical Left’ Uses Energy Costs to Control Americans

Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal speaking at The Heritage Foundation to a group of reporters about his new energy plan.

Neither Jindal nor the Heritage Foundation are considered worthy here:


5 Key Points Marco Rubio Made in His Big Defense Speech Today

Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., outlined his views on the role of America in the world, why we need American power, and his position on what…

Marco Rubio is likewise unpopular, like Gowdy. Except more so.


Please give me a link about HRC shredding documents twenty years ago. You say you're going to vote for someone else if HRC is nominated. But this is 2014. Any picks for this year?

EDIT: I may have found your Bernie and Hillary reference. It doesn't say documents being shredded in 1994, but definitely doesn't invite anyone to vote Democratic:


To find that shredding in 1994 reference, I went to:


The interview is a wash, not a whitewash, but nothing is decided, despite the number of GOPers asking questions. But it has been a GOP boiler plate for twenty years now.

I want Bernie to run in the primaries to make other candidates take a stand one way or the other. I don't expect him to win, because of his age and disposition. Unfortunately, that is the case in American politics now.

I have trouble with believing Hillary will win, unless she has a ground game we don't see here. I don't even know if she will run. Bernie said on MTP that he would likely run as a Democrat in order to make use of their fifty state organization. I also doubt he can win.

Sherrod Brown is unknown, but might get Democratic Party support. Meanwhile, we have an election to win in less than two months. We are finishing the primaries in the Senate, HoR and state house races.

Nice. Wonder if they are related to the Bahá'í Faith or Sufism? Just curious.

Seat of the Universal House of Justice, governing body of the Bahá'ís, in Haifa, Israel




IDK if these groups are for the rights of the individual in other respects.

I can think of 70 million good things that are taken for granted right now:

That's how many veterans, elderly, children, disabled and poor persons are paid directly or indirectly every single month. And today I found this:

Typical dramatic series and radio show programs require fear and tension to tip the attention span of viewers (or readers) to be stressed and receptive to propaganda.

No solution to problems, and no process offered, leaves a default position of letting heirarchies, such as corporations and theolocrats, take control of what should be rational, democratically decided issues with equality for all.

That's what 'government of, by and for the people' requires. Instead, with negative imprinting and no civics knowledge, we will get oligarchy and oppression. The evil old government won't be involved anymore, and there will be no process of appeal.

Then some squeal about it when it's too late, as no vision existed before, nor was it allowed to stand without being jeered to death. JMHO.

Go to Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 309 Next »