Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Bipartisan Citizen Beat Down and the End of Democracy -- Michael Collins

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 12:31 PM
Original message
The Bipartisan Citizen Beat Down and the End of Democracy -- Michael Collins
The Bipartisan Citizen Beat Down and the End of Democracy
Fri, 04/29/2011

Michael Collins


Both political parties are manifestly hostile to citizens. This hostility reduces electoral participation to just over 50% of the voting age population for presidential elections and less than 40% for off-year congressional elections. The absence of 50% to 60% of those eligible to vote creates minority rule and threatens the legitimacy of any ruling party. Truly, every election ratifies the rejection of both parties.

Citizens are the foundation of functional democracies. The notion of the individual citizen is disparaged by some as an anachronism, a fanciful label from the 18th century that means little today. Democrats and Republicans parse voters by race, region, religion, and, to a lesser extent, income. These groups and subgroups within them are the building blocks of electoral victory according to the common wisdom.

Nevertheless, a vibrant democracy relies on individual citizens who give legitimacy to the nation state every day through their broad ascent to the laws, civil and criminal, and their willing participation in politics and civil obligations, formal and informal.

Citizens Consistently Reject the Political Process and Rulers

From 1980 through 2010, off-year elections showed a 37% average turnout. Presidential elections had a slightly higher participation, averaging 53% since 1980.




We were told that 2008 would break turnout records. When the dust settled, voter turnout was only two points higher than 2004. Only 38% of eligible voters turned out for the 2010 congressional elections.

The forbidden fact about public rule in the United States is simple and obvious: it is nothing more than perpetual battle between two minority factions that consistently fail citizens. Major changes in power represent voter punishment of the most recent failed rulers, while the largest faction, non-voters, consistently make the most profound statement about governance - it's not worth the trouble of voting.

The Bipartisan Beat Down

The non-voters and many of those who vote reluctantly have good reasons for their clear dissatisfaction with the political system.

Candidates are compromised before every single election by the uniform bias towards those with the greatest ability to make campaign contributions. Money is the first election hurdle. Those elected say that, at most, money buys access, a damning admission that is short of the truth. Money buys votes, legislation, regulation and other favors from the government, all used to preserve and expand the interests of those with the most money to give.

Once elected, the compromised servants are more interested in their true constituents, their big money patrons, than they are in the public.

Those elected give us wars that the majority reject or would have rejected had they received even the barest outline of the rationales for war.

Those elected cut long-standing benefits in order to maintain government subsidies for their contributors. Democrats countered the Republican proposal to destroy Medicare with a kinder, gentler set of austerity proposals. Social Security is also in the bipartisan cross hairs. Republicans long to privatize the system while Democratic leaders endorse the findings of a presidential commission co-chaired by two Wall Street minions who started with two assumptions. Benefits cuts were necessary and the military budget and bailouts were off limits. The cruel dialectic swings between nothing and nothing much at all.

Flat income, when adjusted for inflation, and no new jobs, when adjusted for population growth are the work product of those who rule in our name.

The elected dismiss threats to the environment of hand then offer remedies in the form of energy policies that produce more pollution.

The rights and protections supposedly guaranteed by the Constitution remain in tatters despite electoral changes. Habeas corpus is in limbo. Electronic surveillance becomes an option whenever authorities feel the need. They just file a motion with a secret federal court in Washington, DC and get the warrant (if they have time to bother). Torture continues as a sanctioned government program.

Citizens who just say no to voting or who vote with little expectation of change know these fundamental truths. Our votes do not matter. Our public servants are really privateers working for moneyed interests. Ultimately, there is no moral obligation or intellectual honesty on the part of rulers. They promote an ongoing fraud that has severely damaged the country. These so-called public servants have taken things so far down the road to ruin; there may be no achievable solution.

There is no law to protect us. We are at the whim of the financial elite, the author of our troubles.

There is no national hope, no future, and no redemption as long as the current system remains in place controlled by those with large accumulations of money.

END

This article may be reproduced entirely or in part with attribution of authorship and a link to this article.

http://www.economicpopulist.org/content/bipartisan-citizen-beat-down-and-end-democracy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. TOO TRUE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. K&R
Excellent read
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starry Messenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
4. k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
5. Put an end to the world's biggest, fanciest whorehouse by demanding Publicly financed elections.
Campaigns that last no more than four months. Use our publicly owned airwaves to give equal time to all candidates. ( I know I'm laughing too, but I mean it, goddangit.)

(And: make the actual brothels legal and unionized!)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aerows Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Couldn't agree more
Legalize the honest whorehouses and get rid of the dishonest one (Congress + Lobbyists)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
7. K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
8. Kick. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
9. KnR
Go Mikey! You tell it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
10. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Bookmarked. Has this ever been in an Original post, DeSwiss?
I haven't read it yet, but if it's good(& you posted it, so i'm trusting it is) maybe it could get its own thread?

We really need to get cuttin' on that issue. "Move the movement", as it were.

Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. I've never posted about it....
Edited on Fri Apr-29-11 03:42 PM by DeSwiss
...I've only posted the link within my thread responses because from what I've seen of it I agree with the basic premise:



As far as it's "worthiness" is concerned, I'd say that at this point in time.... where we are as a nation and in the world at-large.... yeah I'd say that we need to kick all the bastards out. Every damned one of them. Everywhere. (A concept which doesn't necessarily fit all that well with respect to the Democratic Party here in DUland. But that idea seems to be changing somewhat too). ;)

- And then I believe we should http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wDJ18m6KUW4">start anew with a http://thevenusproject.com/">resource-based economy which views the entire planet as a http://www.youtube.com/user/TZMOfficialChannel#g/u">common heritage that belongs to each and every single one of us.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. We're overdue for a complete overhaul
Edited on Fri Apr-29-11 06:05 PM by autorank
I agree. We need a new set of candidates who will contract with the public on concerns of personal benefit. I took a shot at a model contract a while ago. Others should do so as well. Each and every politician serving and running for office should sign up. The idea of such an agreement by leaders started in Venice when it began it's ascent to the most successful and tolerant state in the world. The leader (the Doge) had to list any known relatives or friends and pledge to not do business with them or benefit them in any way.

A Contract with the Citizens United States of America
Required for every elected official without exception.

Here's how it worked in Venice, for several hundred years of glorious success.
While doges had great temporal power at first, after 1268, the doge was constantly under strict surveillance: he had to wait for other officials to be present before opening dispatches from foreign powers; he was not allowed to possess any property in a foreign land.

The doges normally ruled for life (although a few were forcibly removed from office). After a doge's death, a commission of inquisitori passed judgment upon his acts, and his estate was liable to be fined for any discovered malfeasance. The official income of the doge was never large, and from early times holders of the office remained engaged in trading ventures. These ventures kept them in touch with the requirements of the grandi.

From July 7, 1268, during a vacancy in the office of doge, the state was headed ex officio, with the style vicedoge, by the senior consigliere ducale (ducal counsellor).Wipedia

If the leader screwed up, the penalty was banishment from Venice. That was very harsh in the 13th century since Europe was in the Middle Ages and the European alternatives to Venice were a huge step down.

That's how you get them to obey and act like public servants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msedano Donating Member (682 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #18
36. i love it
when an officeholder gets booted by the voters, exile the scum badwater in the middle of death valley.

but shucks, that means folks actually would get off their asses and vote. sadly, that's collins' well-honed point: except for you and me, we're a nation of lard asses who won't vote despite our lives depend on it.



recommended.

mvs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
txlibdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #13
24. +1 (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
12. I want to participate in a Political Party that doesn't make me sick.
A Political Party that STANDS for something like THIS:
"In our day these economic truths have become accepted as self-evident. We have accepted, so to speak, a second Bill of Rights under which a new basis of security and prosperity can be established for all—regardless of station, race, or creed.

Among these are:

*The right to a useful and remunerative job in the industries or shops or farms or mines of the nation;

*The right to earn enough to provide adequate food and clothing and recreation;

*The right of every farmer to raise and sell his products at a return which will give him and his family a decent living;

*The right of every businessman, large and small, to trade in an atmosphere of freedom from unfair competition and domination by monopolies at home or abroad;

*The right of every family to a decent home;

*The right to adequate medical care and the opportunity to achieve and enjoy good health;

*The right to adequate protection from the economic fears of old age, sickness, accident, and unemployment;

*The right to a good education.

All of these rights spell security. And after this war is won we must be prepared to move forward, in the implementation of these rights, to new goals of human happiness and well-being.

Americas own rightful place in the world depends in large part upon how fully these and similar rights have been carried into practice for all our citizens.

For unless there is security here at home there cannot be lasting peace in the world."---FDR


Anyone know where I can find a Political Party like THAT? :shrug:



Who will STAND UP and FIGHT for THIS American Majority?
"By their WORKS you will know them."



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
14. Kick. (nt)
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. K&R for my handsome fellows.
:loveya:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Ma'am,
Where is that "tipping of the hat" emoticon? :loveya:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
17. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. But...
Queens aren't allowed to marry in this country. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #20
27. No ifs, ands, or buts about it buddy....
Edited on Fri Apr-29-11 09:15 PM by autorank
It's an act of :grouphug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. Did we get a groupon?
Yes! :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wind Dancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
19. K & R!
He nailed it! Sad commentary on our political system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
21. Recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
22. Kicked and recommended.
Thanks for the thread, Kurovski.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. I'll post damn near anything Collins writes, Uncle Joe.
Just as long as he doesn't use foul language. We are all ladies and gentleman here at the DU. :D :hi:

--You're welcome.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #23
29. Speak for yourself...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. And you wonder why you found no royal invite in the post.
What are we to do with the likes of you, my dear Mr autorank? What I ask you now, what?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. How about one of those nifty facebook.com questions
Edited on Fri Apr-29-11 09:41 PM by autorank
Is autorank a lout?

Would autorank drink a 12 pack before his wife's baby shower?

Was autorank the guy who suggested the comb-over to trashy Trump?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. I don't know.
That sounds like a terrible mistake. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #32
35. ...hey, but Mark Crispin Miller might like it.
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #22
28. Hey Joe
Pretty stylish having Kurvoski post my piece:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #28
38. autorank, you must be living right in spite of all the rumors to the contrary.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #38
41. The rumors are correct
Kurvoski has just lowered his standards. Something about he stoops to conquer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #28
42. Are my seams straight?
I can't see back there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
25. Kick. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
26. K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 07:10 AM
Response to Original message
34. Kick. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
37. K & R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
39. k (too late to r)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
40. Kick. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC